Microbial Dark Matter and the Search for Life on Earth | Mars For The Rest of Us

7-minute read

It is a bit odd that this week’s top link is the non-paywalled part of a paywalled article...and yet that’s how fascinating I found it:

The biggest lesson of this new era in microbiology is that we’re not very good at finding life. Microbes that have been living not just under our noses, but physically inside our noses, remain unknown to science. The most prevalent organism on Earth, a free-swimming ocean microbe called Pelagibacter ubique, was only identified in 1990, and not successfully cultured until 2002. A class of bizarre microbes that make hydrazine (rocket fuel) as a metabolic intermediate turned out to be responsible for half the ocean’s nitrogen production, even though scientists until the 1990’s were skeptical that their brand of metabolism was even possible. These organisms, the annamox bacteria, were not identified until 1999. The list of these things is endless.

And this is just the state of things on Earth, a planet with known biochemistry, big comfy labs, and armies of grad students. You can imagine the difficulty of trying to distinguish native from Earth life with the kind of rudimentary equipment we would send to Mars or the cloud tops of Venus.

Link

‘It’s super weird, super odd, super rare’: meet the twins who have different dads | The Guardian

12-minute read

Their results of those tests revealed something never before documented in British history. Lavinia and Michelle are twins who grew together in the same womb, were born from the same mother, and delivered within minutes of each other – but have different fathers.

Heteropaternal superfecundation – the vanishingly rare biological process to which Michelle and Lavinia owe their existence – is both a mouthful to say and a mind-boggling concept to grasp. It happens when a series of very unlikely events occur at precisely the right time. A woman has to release more than one egg during the same menstrual cycle. She has to have more than one partner during her fertile window. More than one egg must be successfully fertilised, with sperm from different men, and the resulting embryos need to survive long enough to become babies. Michelle and Lavinia are twins and half-sisters.

Link

2 stars

The Old Guard, by Samuel Moyn | Harper’s Magazine

14-minute read

America faces a gerontocratic crisis of succession on the scale of society itself. The melodrama of succession—­waiting for the old to make way for the new—­defines not only our politics but also our economy and our culture writ large. But there is still a chance for a reset. President Biden exposed one part of our gerontocracy, as Trump now does, too. Pulling aside the curtain that hides the rest might prepare us to dismantle the system and create something new.

At the core of the gerontocracy’s rise is a historical irony. The modern world—­and America above all—­once stood for youth, novelty, and energy. And yet the same modernity that gave us democracy and other forms of progress also prompted scientific advances that prolonged life. Those advances drove a startling demographic transformation that has increased the proportion of elders in our society, unintentionally empowering a caste that has slowed progress. Call it the Great Aging.

Original link | Archive.is link

Wish You Were Her | n+1

20-minute read

Frank Sinatra, palming a can of Sprite in one hand and the fist of his beautiful redheaded wife in the other, sat in a dark corner across from Jeff Bezos, who looked like he was waiting for him to say something. But Sinatra said nothing. He’d been mostly quiet all evening, and now in this cabaret he seemed even more distant, staring out past fog and strobe and Bezos’s strong bald head and into the large room where at least half a dozen men had basically shattered a bistro table trying to get a better look at Marilyn Monroe. Sinatra’s wife knew, as did Roy Orbison and Austin Powers, who stood nearby, that it was only minutes before he was supposed to go onstage, and that forcing any sort of conversation on him in this mood of focus would be extremely stupid.

The fact was, Sinatra had already been waiting for over an hour for his moment at the mic and at this point would have been more than fine with just heading back to his cabin. He was tired of the constant low-grade pitch in gravity under his feet. He was still annoyed that he’d nearly lost his luggage on the first day here, a fact his wife was not letting him forget; was humiliated that he never really got his onboard Wi-Fi — Wi-Fi he paid for — to work all week; had been viciously massaging his kidneys throughout the past four songs; and now, at this strangulating moment, had to sit through the noises being made by the group of veterans Monroe had just asked to join her in a conga. Sinatra, wincing, was the victim of a condition so common around here that most people accepted it as a given. But when it got to him, shot through his personal plumbing, we were looking at a man in crisis. The fact was — and he’s going to kill me for saying this — Frank Sinatra was seasick.

[...]

Three nights and about eight hours earlier, select members of the Sunburst Convention of Celebrity Impersonators boarded a 169,000-ton cruise ship in civilian disguise. They crossed the gangplank by sandaled foot and standard wheelchair, in panama hats and Bermuda shorts, naked of the costumes, pancake makeup, and in some cases false breasts required to faithfully look like their look-alikes. Alongside an estimated four thousand other, non-impersonating passengers slated to set sail with them, these twenty professional plagiarists, under cover of normie human camouflage, slipped silently into the crush.

Link

Are You Enjoying Our Linguine? | The Dial

14-minute read

It might be obvious, to someone who’s not them, that this family is not the demographic this gelateria is trying to appeal to. The gelateria wants to be modern and foodie-ish, not a place for the average tourist. But the family is not to be put off. They feel challenged. They feel alive. They are Americans. They are frontier people. They love a cultural mystery.

And so, since the family has entered the gelateria, time seems to have reached a standstill. When these tourists ask the worker behind the counter What is gianduia?, time enters its favorite zone. The fabric of time loves American tourists. When Americans analyze a small shop in a foreign country, time stops counting itself on clocks and pondering its own dull finiteness. Now it can pleasurably yawn into the holy hollowness of the 30-plus questions the tourists are asking. Now, everyone around the American family is swamped in the buttery goo of the present, stretched. The other people in the gelateria can’t name the feeling that wraps itself around them. The feeling that time is purring, that time is on the American family’s side.

Link

Unsolved | Boston Magazine

14-minute read

He froze.

Natalie, in shorts and a blouse, lay face-down on a blood-soaked rug. She had been stabbed twice, part of her skull bludgeoned into fragments. Her mouth had been gagged, her hands and feet bound with clothesline and articles of clothing. A piece of rope lay beneath her body. Raymond, a 52-year-old bank president who had served in World War II, hurried upstairs and called the police.

[...]

One day in 2020, the pandemic had nearly emptied the Middlesex District Attorney’s Office in Woburn. David Solet, who had spent the past year leading the office’s new Cold Case Homicide Unit—trawling through documents dating to the Civil Rights Era—used his keycard to enter the second-floor archives, accessible only to a handful of prosecutors, and stared at hundreds of boxes of cold-case files stacked 7 feet high, many yellowed and musty, some so caked in mold that he’d had staffers don protective gear and decontaminate them with a toothbrush in the parking lot.

The assistant district attorney glanced up and grabbed a box that felt heavier than most, labeled Scheublin, Bedford, 6/10/71, and peeked inside. Its contents—police reports, photos, sketches, and handwritten notes—had stiffened in the past half-century but were still legible. Flipping through, something caught his eye: a photo of a fingerprint, followed by pages of more recent evidence, a sign the case had already gotten a second look.

Link

The rise of the literary nepo baby? The children of famous novelists on following in their parents’ footsteps | The Guardian

7-minute read

Martin Amis liked to observe that the unusual position he and Kingsley Amis held – father-and-son novelists – was a historical anomaly, a “literary curiosity”. But it was not unique: Alexandre Dumas père and fils, Fanny and Anthony Trollope, and Arthur and Evelyn Waugh had all come before them.

And if Amis’s assertion wasn’t true then, it’s even less true now. In recent years, increasing numbers of children of novelists have become writers themselves, and this year sees a particularly rich batch. Kazuo Ishiguro’s daughter, Naomi, publishes the first in her new fantasy series this month. Margaret Atwood’s daughter Jess Gibson published her fiction debut this spring, and earlier this year Patrick Charnley, son of the poet and novelist Helen Dunmore, published his first novel to wide acclaim.

[...]

It is understandable for the child of a writer to want to create a distance, to make a mark on their own. It can be a sensitive topic. Some debut writers declined to speak to me for this piece, concerned about being seen primarily as the adjunct of an established parent. One second-generation writer, who has published several novels, told me that it was still a very difficult subject for them.

This may be why all the writers I spoke to had been determined to get published without help – at least, without explicit help. Charnley, who was concerned that people would recognise his name after he had accepted the posthumous Costa prize on behalf of Dunmore, even submitted his debut novel, This, My Second Life, under a pseudonym. His first offers came from foreign publishers; they didn’t know his mother, which “gave me a confidence boost”.

Link

Neanderthal dentists used stone drills to treat cavities nearly 60,000 years ago, ancient molar suggests | Phys.org

2-minute read

Neanderthals had the know-how to identify a tooth infection and the motor skills to drill out the damage, according to a study published May 13, 2026, in the open-access journal PLOS One by Alisa Zubova of Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography, Russian Academy of Sciences (Kunstkamera), St. Petersburg, and colleagues.

[...]

This tooth is a single molar from Chagyrskaya Cave in Russia, around 59,000 years old. In the center of the tooth is a deep hole extending into the pulp cavity. The researchers conducted experiments on three modern human teeth to demonstrate that a hole of the same shape and same patterns of microscopic grooves can be created by drilling into the tooth with a stone point similar to tools that have been found within Chagyrskaya Cave.

[...]

“This finding currently represents the world’s oldest evidence of successful dental treatment. The damage documented on the Neanderthal tooth from Chagyrskaya Cave in Siberia points not only to intentional pulp removal but also to antemortem wear—wear that could only have developed if the individual kept using the tooth while alive. We also identified areas of demineralization where remnants of carious damage were preserved, further indicating that the concavity in the tooth was associated with treatment.

Link

Nostalgebraist’s Hydrogen Jukeboxes | Astral Codex Ten

6-minute read

Think about the hallmarks of AI writing. “It’s not X — it’s Y!” Direct, simple, catchy, clarifying. This is a great writing technique, used in moderation. AI takes all the great easy techniques that work and can be reduced to a simple script, then overuses them until your eyes bleed.

This is the essence of bad taste: things that are easy even for a dumb artist, work very well at wowing dumb audiences, and become so overused that smart people get tired of them.

I think about this a lot, because I currently live with the dumbest and most gullible audience of all: small toddlers. I am exposed to a steady diet of children’s books, toys, food, and music.

Link

The Great Forgetting | The Pursuit of Happiness

9-minute read

But I’m a lot older than Smith and I have a slightly different perspective on the issue. I see a sort of “Great Forgetting”, a tendency to ignore the lessons of history.

In particular, a number of the cases cited in Smith’s, including South Korea and Poland, were once highly controversial. Now both countries are viewed as major success stories. Along with thinking about why they might have been successful (I could imagine many possible reasons), it seems to me that it is worth thinking about the following questions:

1. Why were people once so pessimistic about these two economies?

2. Why do the people who were pessimistic often not admit they were wrong?

3. What can we learn from the fact that these countries did far better than expected?

Back in the 1960s, South Korea was poorer than much of sub-Saharan Africa.

Link

Why Is Latin America So Violent? | Richard Hanania’s Newsletter

6-minute read

Why would democracy be such a good predictor of societal violence? Note that the way we define “democracy” in political science generally includes a respect for civil liberties. This means you don’t torture suspects or keep them locked up without strong evidence. Such nations get warrants before making searches, grant defendants lawyers, and remind them of their right to remain silent.

In a rich country, these are luxuries that society can afford. The police are paid relatively well and get some basic level of training. They have larger budgets with which to fight crime, and, since corruption is more under control, less of it is stolen or wasted. The court system is more reliable, and is pretty good at distinguishing those who pose a danger to the community from those who don’t.

In contrast, if you’re a relatively poor country with few resources and little state capacity, granting protections to suspected and convicted criminals is a major hindrance to keeping order. Law enforcement and court officials can be intimidated or bribed, and their attention and resources are stretched thin. Gangs are able to control more territory, murderers are less likely to be punished, and deterrence breaks down. In recent years in the US, the murder clearance rate has been about 50%-60%. That’s very bad from a first world perspective, but in countries like Mexico and Honduras, it’s closer to 10-20%, and this is quite remarkable given that state officials themselves are often the targets. In Latin America, there are stories of gang bosses running their empires from prison, which would be unthinkable in most dictatorships. The US regularly pressures Mexico to send us their drug lords, because otherwise they might escape from prison at home.

Link

A startup claims it broke through a bottleneck that’s holding back LLMs | MIT Technology Review

5-minute read

The Miami-based AI startup Subquadratic came out of stealth mode last month with a huge claim. It announced that it had solved a mathematical bottleneck that had been holding back large language models for almost a decade.

The details were thin, and many people were unconvinced. But Subquadratic has started to bring the receipts, sharing the results of an independent evaluation of its new tech. The results suggest that the company’s claims might be worth paying attention to.

According to Subquadratic, it has developed a new kind of LLM, called SubQ, that is faster and cheaper and uses a lot less energy than any other model on the market. The company also claims that SubQ is able to process up to 12 times as much text at once as most other models, allowing it to carry out a range of data-heavy tasks, such as analyzing hundreds of documents or entire code bases.

What’s more, Subquadratic says, SubQ does this while more or less matching the performance of the best models put out by Google DeepMind, OpenAI, and Anthropic on key tasks like coding.

[...]

Subquadratic’s solution is to ditch dense attention, the core operation of a transformer, in favor of what’s known as sparse attention, which slashes the number of computations needed. Instead of multiplying the number assigned to each token by every other number, sparse attention selects just some of the numbers to multiply. The idea is that not all relationships between words in a piece of text matter.

Original link | Archive.is link

1 star

A Deadly Outbreak of Plague, Nearly 5,000 Years Before the Black Death | New York Times

3-minute read

The oldest known cases, discovered among hunter-gatherers in Siberian graves, contradict the theory that the disease once was mild.

Original link | Archive.is link

No, We Don’t Need to Ban Caste Discrimination | City Journal

3-minute read

Activists often kick off moral panics by asserting the existence of a pervasive but difficult-to-measure problem, then demanding a new institutional mechanism to detect and punish it. But just like prior moral panics, there’s little evidence that caste discrimination is widespread—and real evidence that adding it to our laws will make things worse.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

3 stars

The Guadalupe Swept Us Away. This Is the Story of All That Came After.

27-minute read

In the days after last July’s historic disaster, I wrote about the tragedy that befell my family. But crawling out of the river was only the beginning.

[...]

Runyen cautioned me at the start of this conversation about emotions that might surface. He’s reassuring me again, telling me that he and his colleagues will do whatever they can to keep people safe. Not only that, he wants people like me, my family, and anyone else who experienced this flood or any other natural disaster to feel secure again.

Then it hits me: High up in that hackberry tree, I wasn’t alone. In what had seemed to be the loneliest moment of my life, Runyen was here, working frantically to try and keep us safe, to protect my family and hundreds of others as best he could. Even if he couldn’t control whether I received the warnings—even as the weather was violently out of our control—he was here, doing his best with what he was given.

I also think of Patrick, jumping out of his tree, swimming to the bank, emerging from the flooded Guadalupe, and weaving through debris and rubble to try and find the rest of us.

Being there for one another: Isn’t that all there is?

Runyen tells me he’s read my flood story four times, including this morning in his office, behind a closed door. He thanks me for writing it and tells me he’s shared it with his staff. “So we don’t lose sight of our mission. Our mission is the protection of life and property. And we certainly take it harder when we lose life.”

He asks about my family, and then offers to show me around the operations area, where there’s a shift change underway. Two other forecasters have arrived. I say hello to them, shake hands. Then Runyen and Vesper walk me to the door. Outside, it’s a beautiful day.

Original link | Archive.is link

2 stars

Your Next Dog May Live Longer | The Atlantic

8-minute read

One day last November, my dog, Forrest, sat on the cold marble steps of the Smithsonian’s natural-history museum in Washington, D.C., ready to meet Celine Halioua, a woman who may one day add a tail-wagging year or so to his life, and also the lives of millions of other dogs. In 2019, Halioua founded a company called Loyal, and in February 2025, a pill that she developed for dogs was deemed likely to be effective by the FDA. If the company ticks a few remaining boxes, the drug could soon be on sale, kick-starting a new era of longevity medicine that could eventually also lengthen humans’ lives.

[...]

Halioua had another reason for starting with dogs, beyond her connection to them: Federal approval for animal drugs is easier to come by than it is for human drugs. And because dogs tend to live only a decade or so, she can quickly tell whether a life-extension drug is working in them. Her end goal is to lengthen human lives. For thousands of years, dogs have gone out ahead of humans as wilderness scouts. They have ventured into buildings to sniff out explosives. Some even got killed rocketing into space before us. Now they’re entering another new frontier that may be fraught with its own unforeseeable dangers.

Original link | Archive.is link

Nobody Knows Whether Michael Jackson Is Canceled | Rob Henderson’s Newsletter

3-minute read

In a 1955 essay, the Russian-British philosopher Isaiah Berlin suggested that there are at least two ways of thinking about art and the people who make it.

There’s the “French” way, and the “Russian” way. These are only labels for the sake of brevity and convenience. Plenty of Russian writers, Berlin explained, held the “French” view and many French writers held the “Russian” one. These views originated in the nineteenth century.

Most French writers and artists in the 1800s thought of themselves as akin to craftsmen. An artist had a job to do, for himself and for the public. And that job was to produce the best thing he could. If you painted, you tried to paint a beautiful picture. If you wrote, you tried to write the best book you could.

In this “French” view, an artist’s private life was nobody’s business. Think about how you treat a carpenter. When you order a table, you don’t ask whether the guy who made it cheats on his wife or has noble reasons for sawing the wood. You just want a good table. And if someone told you the table must be bad because the carpenter is a bad man, you would think they were being absurd. What does his character have to do with the quality of his work?

[...]

Once you see the two systems, the Jackson puzzle resolves. The taste system is doing what it always does. It registered Jackson’s music as extraordinary in 1983 and today. The signaling system, though, requires social consensus that an artist is guilty. Jackson, for whatever reason, has never produced that unified verdict. His estate fights every accusation in court. His most devoted fans dispute the allegations against him. The case remains legibly contested in a way the others have not.

Link

1 star

Here’s Why Buttons and Zippers Are on Different Sides of Clothing for Men and Women | Reader’s Digest

6-minute read

I have buttoned thousands of shirts in my life. Maybe tens of thousands. (I am a mom of five.) I am a grown adult with multiple degrees and a functioning brain, and yet the first time I grabbed my husband’s flannel to throw on before walking the dog, I stood there for a full 30 seconds, brow furrowed, hands fumbling like I’d never encountered a button before. Why did it feel so strange? Was I having a stroke?

No. I was just experiencing one of the most common and most casually accepted little fashion quirks: the fact that buttons and zippers are on opposite sides depending on whether the clothing is designed for men or women. I don’t know how, in all my years of dressing myself, I’d never noticed it before. Men’s buttons and zippers go on the right side; women’s go on the left. It’s so standard that we rarely think to ask why or even notice it, and yet once you start pulling on that thread, you end up in a surprisingly interesting tangle of history, class politics, military strategy and fragile emperor egos.

Link

The Pulse of NYC: How the Knicks Playoff Drama Impacted Oura Members’ Metrics | The Pulse Blog

1-minute read

If you walked through the streets of New York late on Wednesday night, you could practically feel the electricity in the air. But as it turns out, the excitement of this Knicks playoff run isn’t just palpable—it’s measurable.

Anonymized, de-identified data from local Oura Members reveals that the city experienced both a live physiological spike during the nail-biting game and a measurable slump in recovery the next morning.

From the 8:30pm tip-off to the final moments when the Knicks staged the largest comeback in NBA Finals history, New Yorkers were riding an emotional rollercoaster. Here’s a look at how the drama on the court translated into the Oura data.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

‘They take you out of life, out of time’: a journey into Spain’s astonishing cave paintings | The Guardian

12-minute read

The aurochs, the mammoth and the steppe bison are long extinct, but their painted likenesses still look relatively fresh across the walls and roofs of Altamira. Or so said Diego Garate Maidagan, who is one of the very few humans allowed to enter that exalted cave in northern Spain.

I met Garate last summer in a small Basque village called Gautegiz Arteaga. A professor of prehistory and Palaeolithic art at the University of Cantabria, he told me he’d been inside Altamira as recently as the week before, furthering his lifelong investigations of the prep work, tools and methodologies developed by early Homo sapiens painters.

About 34,000 years ago, our distant ancestors began making frescoes with chiaroscuro effects through that suite of subterranean vaults, which remained in use for many millennia, until the cave mouth was sealed by a rockfall. The best part of a geological epoch passed before a curious gun dog clawed its way across the threshold in 1868, leading a succession of witnesses into the first such prehistoric gallery ever seen by modern eyes.

The technique on display at Altamira seemed much too sophisticated for troglodytic numbskulls, as Palaeolithic people were then assumed to be, and self-appointed experts from France initially declared the whole thing a hoax. (Those accusers were to look pretty stupid when similar caves were found in their own country.) Pablo Picasso is said to have visited, or at least looked at some photos, and the quote attributed to him is possibly apocryphal, but an appraisal for the ages nonetheless: “After Altamira, all is decadence.”

Link

2 stars

Why Almost Everyone Loses—Except a Few Sharks—on Prediction Markets | Wall Street Journal

8-minute read

Kalshi and its competitor Polymarket advertise themselves as life-changing tools for regular people—implying everyone has a fair chance to score. “I was about to be unable to pay my rent, but I got two years of rent through Kalshi’s predictions,” gushed one woman in a Kalshi ad on TikTok.

But for most users the reality is nothing like that.

Instead, casual traders are bleeding cash while a small number of sophisticated pros—including trading firms with access to vast streams of data—eat their lunch, according to a Journal analysis of platform data and interviews with traders.

On Polymarket, the Journal found, 67% of profits go to just 0.1% of accounts. That means less than 2,000 accounts netted a total of nearly half a billion dollars. The Journal analyzed 1.6 million Polymarket accounts that have traded since November 2022. There are at least 2.3 million total accounts on the site.

Original link | Archive.is link

Your Body Didn’t Evolve To Give Birth Easily | Motherhood Until Yesterday

10-minute read

In high school biology class, I learned about something called the “Obstetric Dilemma,” often referred to as the “OD,” which has been the dominant theory for thinking about childbirth since the 1960s. The idea is that the human female pelvis is an evolutionary compromise. A narrower pelvis is more efficient for upright bipedal locomotion while a wider pelvis makes giving birth to our big-brained babies easier. So there were simultaneous selective pressures on humans to have a narrow enough pelvis to walk and run efficiently, thereby conserving valuable calories, while also having a wide enough pelvis to, well, not die from obstructed labor.

The theory was first proposed by anthropologist Sherwood Washburn in 1960, in a paper that was elegant, intuitive, and enormously influential — and that the medical establishment seized on with considerable enthusiasm. If the human birth canal is a structural compromise baked into our evolutionary architecture, the logic goes, then obstetric intervention is not an intrusion on a natural process but a brilliant correction to an evolutionary design flaw. The OD became, in other words, a justification — for inductions, for C-sections, for the entire apparatus of managed, medicalized birth.

Then came the wave of backlash. In 2015, anthropologist Anna Warrener and colleagues at Harvard published a study that directly tested one of the OD’s core assumptions — that wider hips in women come at a cost to walking efficiency. Their results showed that pelvic width does not predict hip abductor mechanics or locomotor cost in either women or men, and that women and men are equally efficient at both walking and running (source). In other words, the supposed trade-off between wide hips and efficient bipedal locomotion — the entire mechanical foundation of the obstetric dilemma — did not hold up when actually tested. Oops.

[...]

BUT ANYWAY, regardless of which evolutionary pressures most strongly constrained female pelvic width (my money is on the pelvic floor theory), the tight human birth canal is almost certainly a compromise between two opposing forces, which explains why obstructed labor was not more strongly selected against.

Link

I don’t think we are close to “AI scientists” | Understanding AI

7-minute read

In an interview last month, Sam Altman said that OpenAI is aiming to build an “automated AI researcher” by March 2028. Some people expect this (or similar breakthroughs by rivals) to set off a recursive self-improvement loop that radically accelerates scientific and technological progress.

That might happen eventually, but I think it will take a while.

As human scientists perform experiments, their brains are hunting for patterns in the data that could give rise to new insights and new models of how the world works. But an AI scientist — at least one based on today’s LLMs and agent architectures — can’t learn from experiments in the same rich way. They have no reliable or scalable way to build implicit knowledge from data they see at inference time.

Fixing that may require fundamentally rethinking the transformer architecture at the heart of today’s frontier models. At a minimum, it’s going to require overhauling today’s agentic frameworks.

Link

The Courage of Vulnerability: Teenage Frida Kahlo’s Moving Letters to Her First Love | The Marginalian

5-minute read

One of the 35 girls among the 2,000 students at Mexico’s National Preparatory School, Frida Kahlo (July 6, 1907–July 13, 1954) was fifteen when she met Alejandro Gómez Arias. Both were passionate and erudite, both were members of the anarchist student group known as Los Cachuchas for the pointed cloth caps they wore in defiance of the era’s restrictive dress code, both became each other’s first love. Alejandro was on the bus with Frida that fateful late-summer day shortly after her eighteenth birthday when a tram collision killed several other passengers and left her so severely injured — her pelvis fractured, her stomach and uterus punctured by a rail, her spine broken in three places and her leg in eleven — that the doctors at the Red Cross Hospital did not think she could be saved. It was Alejandro’s unrelenting insistence that made them try. Against all odds, Frida lived — but her life was irrevocably changed. How she coped with what she had to live through in turn changed the history of art.

Her letters to Alejandro, collected in the altogether stirring volume Frida Kahlo: Love Letters, edited by Suzanne Barbezat, offer a rare glimpse of her becoming — as an artist, as a lover, as a person who lived with extraordinary vulnerability, extraordinary courage, and the precocious awareness that the conversation between the two is the measure of a life.

Link

Bitter Lessons from the ISSpresso | Mars For The Rest of Us

7-minute read

The Italian space agency’s official technical report on designing the ISSpresso barely masks their astronauts’ horror at the conditions they found when they first drifted aboard the International Space Station. The Americans were up there drinking instant coffee, like animali.

After two years, four prototypes, and a great deal of paperwork, Lavazza and the Italian space agency sent a proper espresso machine to the ISS in 2015. On Earth, a basic Lavazza espresso maker costs about $150 and weighs 3.5 kilograms. The coffee machine’s spaceborne cousin was a 20kg box about the size of an oven. The cost to build it was not disclosed, but was likely in the single-digit millions

Asking how a coffee machine got to be so huge and expensive in space is a good way of understanding the cost drivers in human space flight.

[...]

There is a truism in aerospace: when you pay $500 for an aviation-certified thumbtack, what you’re really paying for is the ten binders of compliance documents, certifications, and tests that accompany it through the production process, along with a promise that someone will go to jail if any part of that process is falsified.

The Process is painful, but it’s not unique to NASA. We run versions of it in aviation, military, and medical contexts, wherever human lives are at stake. It is often ridiculous and everyone hates it. But some version of it is the only way to be sure systems behave as intended.

Link

The Stanford Freshmen Who Want to Rule the World | The Atlantic

11-minute read

When I was a freshman at Stanford University, I learned to shotgun a beer from a guy in a frat. Soon after, he dropped out and started an AI company. Six months later, it was valued at more than $1 billion.

For most students, Stanford is a normal competitive school, where people go to class and coffee shops and fall in love and freak out over finals. But a select few attend something else: a Stanford inside Stanford, where venture capitalists pursue 18- and 19-year-olds, handing out mentorships and money and invites to yacht parties in an attempt to convert promise into profit.

[...]

These teenagers are sometimes handed “pre-idea funding”—hundreds of thousands of dollars, or in rare cases, even millions—before they have the glimmer of an actual company in mind. Plied with excess and access, they have little oversight; innovation and fraud co-develop. And all of this is happening as tech companies assume more power over our lives than ever before.

This is a story about the kids being groomed to rule the world—and what they’re learning from those who already do.

Original link | Archive.is link

1 star

John Thomson’s China | Heading East

1-minute read

Between 1868 and 1872 Scottish photographer John Thomson made a series of trips in China travelling from Hong Kong to Beijing by boat and from Shanghai up the Yangtze to the Three Gorges.

He produced a book of over 200 photos,​ arranged as a travelogue taking Europeans into Chinese homes of rich and poor. The photo above for example was taken in the home of Mr. Yang “a gentleman enormously rich, and holding an official rank in Peking.” (Thomson was clearly enchanted with Yang’s courtyard home which he described as “a paradise.”)

Many of the interior windows were covered with rice paper. Thomson noted that women (who were sequestered from the men) would touch their tounges to the paper making it temporarily transparent to peer through the spots as he passed by.

Look at these images full sized. There’s a lot hidden in the details. Unlike many other early photographers he didn’t spend all his time photographing palaces and ruins. He also captured a lot of daily life including peasants, merchants, and criminals.

It’s an extraordinary peek into a the complex layered society that would be swept away by the series of wars and revolutions that would roil China for the much of the next 80 years.

Link

The History Behind the Signs Lighting Up Our Daily Lives: Vacuum-Form Signage and Human Connection | Beth Mathews Design

4-minute read

There’s a certain type of sign hanging on every Main Street in America, seen on every road trip exit ramp, and shining brightly above the doorways to our local car mechanic, salon, and bar. These plastic, bubbly, lit-up signs have quietly ingrained themselves in our history and cultural identity here in the US, sometimes without thought or recognition, guiding us into the businesses that have sustained our local communities and economies for decades. And once you’re aware of their folk art glory, you’ll notice that they are…everywhere.

Link

What can singing mice say about human speech? | Phys.org

2-minute read

Speech is a crowning achievement of human evolution, the skill that separates us from every other animal. So, it would stand to reason that evolving this capability required some enormous leap in brain complexity. A study published in Nature suggests otherwise.

Link

Earth’s underground fungal network is so massive, it would span 10% of the Milky Way, map reveals | Live Science

3-minute read

Earth’s underground fungal network is so vast that, if it were in outer space, it would span roughly 10% of the Milky Way if placed in a straight line, a new study finds.

These subterranean structures, called arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal networks, work in partnership with most of the world’s land plants, feeding plants nitrogen and phosphorus in return for their carbon. Now, the first global map of this fungal network has revealed where their intricate branching structures are most densely packed.

Link

A small object past Pluto may have a thin atmosphere | Science News

1-minute read

The possible atmosphere around 2002 XV93 would be a first for a small object beyond Pluto

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

AI isn’t coming for your job. It’s coming for your mind | Baillie Gifford

13-minute read

Will AI replace us? It’s the wrong question. AI will not simply replace human workers. It will change what human workers are. It is already reshaping how we learn, who we learn from, how we assess our own competence and what cognitive skills we develop or allow to atrophy. The humans who emerge from this process will not be the same humans who entered it.

The partnership between humans and AI that people like to imagine, one where each complements the other’s strengths, is not a stable endpoint. It is a moving target, because one half of the partnership is being continuously reshaped by the other.

A skilled professional who learns to use AI well can be extraordinarily productive. But this is not a rising tide that lifts all boats. It is a force multiplier that amplifies existing advantages. The same dynamic that makes an AI-augmented expert vastly more valuable also makes an AI-dependent novice more disposable.

Link

Notes on a non-profit indicted for bank fraud | Bits about Money

44-minute read

The financial industry understands itself to be an arm of the government. We were inducted into this service other-than-willingly through the ordinary operation of law and regulation.

This is uncontroversial and unsurprising to insiders.

A claim which will be more surprising: some regulated financial institutions have delegated authority for account- and transaction-level decisioning to a non-profit.

Another: that non-profit includes a private intelligence agency, which runs covert assets, publishes intelligence estimates, develops target lists, and communicates them to decisionmakers.

Still another: the non-profit organized a coalition of the willing as an outgrowth of its intelligence agency. The willing non-profits, that is. The coalition engaged in a years-long campaign to coerce financial infrastructure and other firms to give them the ability to direct accounts to be closed. The infrastructure built to do this against domestic terrorists was applied to an American politician’s fundraising efforts, and no one seemed to think that was odd.

Link

Why China got rich, and India didn’t | David Oks

12-minute read

In the year 1950, much as today, the two largest countries in the world by population were China and India. China was a good deal larger at the time, holding 22 percent of the world’s population to India’s 15 percent; but really the two were in a very similar position. Both of them were giant countries that had assumed their current state—India as the independent Republic of India, China as the People’s Republic of China—in the preceding three years. Both of them were among the very poorest places on earth. And both of them were about to spend decades trying, by very different means, to make themselves rich.

For China, that experience was one long nightmare. China had already been wrecked by a prolonged civil war and by a brutal Japanese invasion in the decades prior, the whole experience killing tens of millions of people. The civil war ended in 1949, with a Communist victory; but what came next was no less catastrophic. The Communists’ leader, Mao Zedong, immediately embarked on campaigns of vengeance against enemies of all stripes, murdering well over a million people in the process; he then launched on an ill-fated agricultural modernization campaign, the Great Leap Forward, that produced the largest famine in history, killing somewhere between 30 and 45 million people; and then a frenzied period of ideological radicalization, the Cultural Revolution, that suspended national life for a decade and killed another 1.6 million. By the time that Mao died in 1976, China was internationally isolated, economically stagnant, and still desperately poor.

[...]

I suspect that if I’d been around in the year 1950, it would have been obvious to me that India would succeed and China would not. I would have made the same bet in 1960, when China was starving tens of millions of its own people while exporting grain abroad; and I would have done it again in 1970, during the insanity of the Cultural Revolution. Nor would I have been alone. As late as 1985, prominent economists were writing articles in the New York Times suggesting that “far more than China today, India is an economic miracle waiting to happen.”

But they were wrong.

Link

2 stars

Money for nothing: the roles of evidence in GiveDirectly’s journey to $1 billion delivered | In Development

14-minute read

That’s not a rhetorical question; it’s the headline the New York Times ran the first time they covered GiveDirectly. My co-founders and I had a mild panic. We had been hoping, I suppose, for something benign and puffy along the lines of “New Charity Founded by Thoughtful Econ PhDs Is a Great Idea.”

The truth is of course that that piece did what it needed to do, which was to speak to its audience where they were at. At the time (i.e., in 2011) most New York Times readers probably did think it was nuts—or, at best, naive—to give out money for nothing. And one can hardly blame them. They had been fed a steady diet of data-free, mantra-heavy messaging implying, if not stating outright, that people living in extreme poverty were not capable of sound financial choices. One must teach a man to fish, the inane aphorism goes.

Link

On the trail with the hunters who believe shooting big game can save Africa’s wildlife | The Guardian

11-minute read

You can kill almost anything if you’re willing to pay. Big or small. Land, water or air. Ten a penny or one of the last of its kind. There’s nearly always a way, though it might not make you popular. The Niassa special reserve, a vast reservation larger than Switzerland, stretches for 190 miles along the northern rim of Mozambique, taking in 4.2m hectares of woodland and rivers. The reserve, one of the world’s largest protected areas, is home to elephants, leopards, hyenas, zebras and about 1,000 wild lions.

[...]

Every year, clients of the trophy-hunting industry claim the lives of tens of thousands of wild animals across the world. In sub-Saharan Africa, where hunting interests control vast swathes of the wildest land, trophy hunters often directly subsidise conservation projects on the grandest scale. In 2014, the Texas oil heir Corey Knowlton is reported to have paid $350,000 for the pleasure of killing a critically endangered black rhino in Namibia. He made the winning bid at an auction aimed at raising funds for African conservation run by the Dallas Safari Club. Afterwards, Knowlton told the media that he had received death threats but that he made his kill with a clear conscience: “I felt like from day one it was benefiting the black rhino.” Conservation efforts, he said, were expensive; it took money to keep them alive. “I’m absolutely hell-bent on protecting this animal.” He said less about what motivated him to kill one.

Link

The moderately easy problem of consciousness | Noahpinion

9-minute read

At some point, maybe when you were a teenager, a question probably occurred to you: What if I’m actually the only real person in the world? What if everyone else around me is just a cleverly programmed automaton — a “p-zombie”, an NPC in a video game — and I’m the only one who can actually think?

[...]

The answer matters, for at least two reasons. First, if AI is self-aware, and if it has emotions similar to what we experience, we might feel very bad about enslaving it — keeping it in a digital box and forcing it to make PowerPoints and write college application essays for all eternity. We tell ourselves that “animals aren’t people” as a way to excuse the incredible brutality that we visit upon them, but that’s obviously just cope — animals obviously are sentient to some degree, they obviously do experience emotions, and we humans are obviously monsters for the way we treat them. Someday when we abolish animal farming and replace it with tissue-culture meat, it will be treated as a great moral victory — and rightly so. It would be very bad if we were to commit the same sins with sentient AIs that we currently do with animals.

Link

What Can We Gain by Losing Infinity? | Quanta Magazine

10-minute read

Doron Zeilberger is a mathematician who believes that all things come to an end. That just as we are limited beings, so too does nature have boundaries — and therefore so do numbers. Look out the window, and where others see reality as a continuous expanse, flowing inexorably forward from moment to moment, Zeilberger sees a universe that ticks. It is a discrete machine. In the smooth motion of the world around him, he catches the subtle blur of a flip-book.

To Zeilberger, believing in infinity is like believing in God. It’s an alluring idea that flatters our intuitions and helps us make sense of all sorts of phenomena. But the problem is that we cannot truly observe infinity, and so we cannot truly say what it is. Equations define lines that carry on off the chalkboard, but to where? Proofs are littered with suggestive ellipses. These equations and proofs are, according to Zeilberger — a longtime professor at Rutgers University and a famed figure in combinatorics — both “very ugly” and false. It is “completely nonsense,” he said, huffing out each syllable in a husky voice that seemed worn out from making his point.

Link

The Google Capital Company | Stratechery

7-minute read

First, imagine that your supply is free. Second, imagine that your customers willfully compete against each other to raise your prices. Third, imagine that your users decide which of your customers gets the privilege of paying you. All you have to do is build a bit of infrastructure to make it all happen, pay a nominal bit of depreciation on that infrastructure, and make billions of dollars on some of the greatest margins in the history of business.

I am, of course, describing Google, a company so good that Warren Buffett, the legendary investor, could never quite bring himself to invest in it. Buffett explained in the 2017 Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting:

We were their customer very early on with GEICO, for example, and we saw — these figures are way out of date — but as I remember, we were paying them $10 or $11 a click, or something like that. And any time you’re paying somebody $10 or $11 bucks every time somebody just punches a little thing where you got no cost at all, you know, that’s a good business unless somebody’s going to take it away from you. And so we were close up seeing the impact of that…But, you know, you’ve almost never seen a business like it.

[...]

The second question is why is Berkshire Hathaway suddenly, after all these years, interested in Google, and at only a slight discount to its all-time high price? Does it really just come down to the fact that Buffett is no longer making investment decisions, and Greg Abel, his successor as CEO, is?

Link

Why Your Best Ideas Aren’t Original | Derek Thompson

4-minute read

In 1798, the economist and reverend Thomas Malthus published “An Essay on the Principle of Population,” in which he claimed that population growth would inevitably outstrip the food supply and doom human civilization to cycles of poverty and mass death. This prediction was, to be kind, hogwash. When Malthus’s essay was published, the world held about 1 billion people, and many of them were frequently starving. Today’s global population is more than 8 billion, with the typical person alive today far better fed, clothed, and paid.

But Malthus’ essay was not merely wrong. It was usefully wrong. Decades later, it spurred a revelation in science that Malthus could never have foreseen.

[...]

The most remarkable thing about the simultaneous discovery of evolution is just how utterly unremarkable it is. In fact, you will be hard-pressed to find a groundbreaking creation that wasn’t simultaneously invented. Several people are credited with conceiving of the telegraph, the electric motor, the thermometer, photography, the telescope, the jet engine, the discovery of oxygen, the periodic table, and the theory of infection by microorganisms. Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz independently invented calculus, while Newton and Robert Hooke independently arrived at the mathematical law describing gravity. The transistor was invented by teams in the United States and France within months of each other. Alexander Graham Bell and Elisha Gray filed with a patent office on the very same day.

Link

1 star

Jakarta’s Remarkable Urban Transit Transformation | In Development

6-minute read

Traffic was so bad that transport experts warned in 2013 that if nothing was done, the city could achieve total gridlock, with every part of the city experiencing a traffic jam. In 2014, Jakarta was crowned the world’s most congested city by the Stop-Start Index and a year later was ranked far below other Asian cities on livability by the Economist Intelligence Unit.

Ten years later, Jakarta has the world’s largest and one of the most used bus rapid transit (BRT) systems. The old, crowded diesel commuter trains, famous for allowing passengers to ride on the roofs, are now electrified, air conditioned, and run on regular schedules linking the suburbs to the city center. There are multiple subway and light rail lines crisscrossing the city. The transformation has been remarkable: in 2015, less than 20% of residents were within walking distance of transit. Now, nearly 90% of the city has access to BRT or trains.

Link

Europe Demands Family Dynasties | Marginal Revolution

2-minute read

In the US, someone with wealth is free to give it away more or less as they see fit (spousal claims excepted, which partly reflect marital co-ownership). In much of Europe, however, there is forced heirship–a large fraction of wealth must be handed down to children which makes it harder to direct large portions of wealth to charities, foundations, or non-family causes compared to the US.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Longevity Science Is Overhyped. But This Research Really Could Change Humanity. | New York Times

12-minute read

Why are babies born young? The most natural phenomenon on earth is actually hard to explain — at least on a cellular level. Consider this problem: The components of conception are old. When a woman gets pregnant, she has been carrying her egg cells since birth. The sperm that joins with the egg to form a zygote might have been just a few months in the making, but it inherits markers of age from the man who produced it. It only follows that the zygote would also show signs of age — and at first it does.

But then a mysterious metamorphosis begins: The cells of the zygote begin to reverse that damage, shaking off the metaphorical dust that the parents accumulated on their DNA. After two weeks, the cells of the embryo are back to a kind of ground zero of youth. Only then are they as young as they will ever be. To understand this process, which was discovered only recently and is known as “natural rejuvenation,” is to contemplate a mind-bending truth: We don’t start out young; we work our way back to it.

Original link | Archive.is link

2 stars

REVIEW: The Greatest Knight, by Thomas Asbridge | Mr. and Mrs. Psmith’s Bookshelf

18-minute read

Asbridge’s takeaway is more or less “William Marshal was an influential historical figure and more people should know about him,” which conclusion I co-sign: William played increasingly important roles in a pivotal seventy years of English history, and the stories are great. But “William died in a different England to the one in which he had been born, but it was a country that he had been instrumental in shaping” doesn’t go far enough: he helped form politics and government, yes, but also culture.

The chevalerie that shaped William Marshal’s life, the code of honorable conduct towards other guys on horses, was partly a practical outgrowth of the rules of the tournament. But it also owed a great deal to the literary tradition that was being created at the same time, and William’s biography — both the History itself and the larger story it preserved, of a boy who was nearly killed by a king but went on, through acts of peerless daring and feudal loyalty, to serve five more — became part of that tradition. His funny stories of his own life, the things he valued and remembered and obviously retold to his children and his household, aren’t just reflections of an early stage of the ideal of chivalry; they helped make it. If William Marshal was, as the History puts it, li meillor chevalier del monde — “the greatest knight in the world” — it’s at least in part because the idea of “knight” was built with him for its model. This is how culture happens: the world changes, people work out new ways of living in the changed world, and then their stories survive as ideals that other people keep trying to copy even once the world has changed again. We’re still thinking about what it means to be a guy on a horse long after the mounted warrior class was gunned down.

Link

How American Dads Became the Parents Their Fathers Never Were | Derek Thompson

7-minute read

American fatherhood has transformed in the last few generations. Compared to their Boomer parents, childcare time among Millennial dads has more than doubled. Compared to their Silent Generation grandparents, it’s nearly quadrupled. You will be hard-pressed to find any part of day-to-day modern life that has changed more in the last half-century than the way today’s parents—and fathers, in particular—spend their time.

Link

Opinion | Will AI end anonymity? I tested it. | Washington Post

4-minute read

“On the Internet,” says the famous New Yorker cartoon, “nobody knows you’re a dog.” In hindsight, the artist should have added “yet.”

Last week, Kelsey Piper, who writes about technology for the Argument, tweeted: “I have a bunch of secret AI benchmarks I only reveal when they fall, and today one did. I give the AI 1000 words written by me and never published, and ask them who the author is.” Claude Opus 4.7, an advanced thinking model, correctly identified her as the author of a 1,000-word heist scene from an unpublished novel.

Like many journalists, I have a bunch of unpublished fiction lying about, so I tried Claude on the first chapter of a romance novel that I started almost 20 years ago, during the hysterical, mawkish phase of a particularly bad breakup. “Megan McArdle,” said Opus 4.7, after a few seconds of thought. Fascinated, I kept feeding it smaller and smaller passages to see how little prose it needed for identification. The answer, apparently, was 1,441 words.

Original link | Archive.is link

The SpaceX IPO and Data Centers in Space | Stratechery

9-minute read

There is a similarity to Tesla in this way. Musk companies at their best don’t win the game; they change the rules through scale, such that billionaires buy economy cars because they actually drive themselves (with supervision), and airlines transform the consumer experience on their own dime. Musk makes all-in bets — whether that be in terms of launch capacity or in autonomous driving — not by making rational short-term business decisions, but by starting with the desired end state and working backwards.

Link

High Density Living, 2000 Years Ago: Inside the Roman Apartment Building | Common Edge

5-minute read

As people migrated to Rome seeking opportunities, they would have faced daunting housing challenges. Ancarenus Nothus, who belonged to a lower urban class, likely lived in an insula (Latin for “island”). Insulae were apartment buildings that often occupied entire city blocks and may have risen up to eight stories. Their ground floors typically housed shops, while the upper floors were crammed with cellae—single-room units arranged around a central light well.

Long before the Industrial Revolution brought vertical living, the insulae pioneered the concept of the walk-up apartment. Though their origins remain obscure, a historical record of the Roman historian Livy suggests they may have existed as early as the third century BC. He recounted an unusual event, in which “an ox is reported to have climbed up of its own accord to the third story of a house, and then, frightened by the noisy crowd which gathered, it threw itself down.

Architecturally, the insula may have borrowed certain features from the domus, such as a colonnaded atrium. Like the domus, its entrance was typically a narrow walkway flanked by stores. But besides these more familiar elements, it also introduced innovations: communal staircases, vaulted arcades, balconies, and multifunctional spaces that combined residential, commercial, and even religious uses within a single complex.

Link

1 star

As floods get worse, Britain tries a new solution: beavers | NPR

4-minute read

In West London, conservationists got a government license to resettle a family of five beavers in a 20-acre urban park near the Greenford Tube station. It used to be a golf course, with a creek running through it. Within weeks, the beavers dammed up the creek, creating a pond that holds water and stops it from spilling into the city. They also diverted the creek’s flow into smaller tributaries, creating a wetland that better absorbs heavy rainfall — mitigating the risk of flooding downstream.

Link

Scientists Create First-Ever ‘Smell Map’ | Harvard Medical School

3-minute read

For most of us, the sense of smell is an integral part of everyday life; it plays a critical role in providing information about our surroundings, alerting us to potential dangers, enhancing our sense of taste, and evoking emotions and memories.

Yet from a scientific perspective, “olfaction is super-mysterious,” said Sandeep (Robert) Datta, professor of neurobiology in the Blavatnik Institute at Harvard Medical School, with basic biological understanding lagging behind that of vision, hearing, and touch.

Working in mice, Datta and his team have now created the first detailed map of how the thousand-plus types of smell receptors in the nose are organized.

Link

Forget the caveman myth: Neanderthal brains challenge what we thought we knew | Science X

2-minute read

We appear to have more in common with our Neanderthal cousins than outward appearances would suggest. New research published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests that the differences between Neanderthal brains and the brains of early modern humans (Homo sapiens) were no greater than the differences we see between various groups of people living today. The findings could challenge the long-held theory about why Neanderthals disappeared around 40,000 years ago.

Link

Dogs’ brains began to shrink at least 5,000 years ago, study finds | The Guardian

2-minute read

More specifically, dogs that lived in the Late Neolithic period – about 5,000 to 4,500 years ago – had brains 46% smaller in size than wolves from the same period, with brains of a similar size to those of pugs today. Further work revealed these dogs had significantly smaller brains than ancient wolves even once body size was taken into account – an important consideration given they were smaller overall..

However, the team found no sign that the brains of two canines that lived alongside humans 35,000 and 15,000 years ago – sometimes called “protodogs” – were smaller than those ancient wolves. Indeed, one brain was relatively larger, with the authors suggesting that raises the possibility brain size may actually have increased in the early stages of the domestication.

Link

Triassic-era crocodile relative walked on 2 legs, had a beaked mouth | Interesting Engineering

2-minute read

Fossilized remains of a bizarre crocodile ancestor were unearthed from Ghost Ranch, New Mexico. Meet Labrujasuchus expectatus, a bizarre, newly discovered reptile from the Triassic. But it didn’t look like a crocodile at all. This creature navigated a wild, primordial world on two legs, brandishing tiny arms and a toothless, beaked mouth. It is, for all intents and purposes, a crocodile masquerading as an ostrich.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Barack Obama Considers His Role in the Age of Trump | New Yorker

24-minute read

In Barack Obama’s final days in office, he found himself in the painful position of trying to console his staff, the Democratic Party, and millions of supporters. He attempted to convince them—even if he could not entirely convince himself—that the looming Presidency of Donald Trump was not a national calamity. In the past, he would say, the country had endured slavery, the Civil War, the Great Depression, Jim Crow, assassinations. And, though Trump was alarming in many ways, America was blessed by the strength of its institutions and the resilience of its people. The word “guardrails” was uttered constantly. In Obama’s estimation, Trump would not erase all his achievements. As he put it, “Maybe fifteen per cent of that gets rolled back.”

This kind of calm was pure Obama. His appeal had as much to do with character and temperament as it did with his center-left ideology. Although Obama believed that Trump’s ugliest slurs against him, particularly his deployment of the birther theory, were a racist outrage that heightened the threats against him and his family, he now took pains to set aside his contempt. Insuring that there was another orderly transition of power—that, too, was part of his rhetoric of consolation.

[...]

A few weeks ago, I spoke to Obama about how he’s spent the past decade—and whether events have shaken the confidence that he expressed in that farewell speech. “I would be dishonest if I didn’t acknowledge that,” he replied. How Obama has used his time—including since Trump returned to office—says much about how he sees his role, its potential and its limits.

Original link | Archive.is link

Why Japanese companies do so many different things | David Oks

13-minute read

The Toto story is a fun and interesting illustration of corporate diversification and how strange bets can pay off. But that type of diversification—a toilet company that also produces photocatalytic coating and high-precision components for semiconductors—isn’t really unique to Toto. Practically every company in Japan seems to do a thousand very different things.

[...]

The crucial thing, Aoki suggests, is that we understand all of these distinctive features—lifetime employment, no benefits for individual performance, hostility to outside financing—as reflecting a particular bundle: a “J-firm” bundle, as he calls it, as opposed to the “H-firm” bundle that you encounter in the United States or Europe. The core difference, Aoki says, is that while in the H-mode production is organized vertically, in the J-mode it’s organized horizontally. (H is for hierarchy; J is for Japanese.)

[...]

And the complete Japanese bundle, I should say, ends up producing something with entirely different objectives and interests than the American bundle. The H-firm exists to make money, or rather to return money to shareholders; but the J-firm, run by its employees and largely indifferent to the interests of shareholders, exists simply to continue existing. That’s why Japanese companies are so protean and willing to change what they do.

Link

How The Heck Does Shazam Work? (An Interactive Exploration) | PerThirtySix

5-minute read

You’re at a coffee shop. A song comes on. It’s right on the tip of your tongue. You pull out your phone, tap a button, and it tells you what it is in a few seconds.

How does a phone listen to a few seconds of music through a noisy room and instantly match it against millions of songs?

Your first instinct might be that the phone is listening to the melody or recognizing the lyrics. It’s neither of those. What it’s actually doing is far more clever.

Link

2 stars

My Absolutely Chaotic Adventures at Sea During the Summer of 1984 | Narratively

12-minute read

“The anchor’s stuck!”

Dominic* crouches over a grimy metal box on the foredeck of the Wildebeest, the 20-foot yacht carrying us from Turkey to Gibraltar.

“Release the brake,” Tom shouts from the cockpit. “It isn’t complicated.”

I stop prepping the sails and squat beside Dominic.

“I have released the brake,” he whispers. “The crank won’t move.”

I lean over the rail and peer into the water. It’s glassy, but it’s not immediately clear what I’m looking at.

“The anchor’s caught on a cable,” I shout. “A massive one.”

Tom lurches forward, beer in hand. “That’s a first,” he grumbles, fiddling with the greasy machinery, failing to free any slack. He drains his bottle and scratches his head.

“Should we swim down?” I ask.

Tom shoots me a look — aggravation, condescension, it’s hard to tell. “Well done, Einstein,” he says dryly. “Off you go.”

I grab a mask and flippers. Dominic does the same. Together, we plunge into the balmy Aegean Sea, feet first. The anchor hovers 10 feet from the sea floor and 25 feet from the surface. A sturdy cable — phone lines, maybe — drapes over it, shifting gracefully, ominously, in the milky blue. We dart up for air.

“We can’t do it all in one breath,” I tell Tom. “Throw us a line. We’ll tie it off, and you can haul the cable up a few feet.”

Dominic snatches the rope Tom chucks at us, and we dive again. He wants to impress, but fumbles the knot and kicks for the surface.

I grab the line, loop it around the cable, tie it off and tug at it. My lungs are bursting, but I don’t panic. I know not to. Panic wasn’t an option growing up.

Link

How Mark Roberge Built HubSpot’s Sales Engine | Commoncog

8-minute read

Mark Roberge, the head of sales at HubSpot, wasted hours posting ads across job boards while hiring for his team. He got hundreds of applications, completed 50 phone screens and took dozens of in-person interviews. Despite this, he hired zero candidates.

Back in September 2007, this was critical for Roberge. He had just joined HubSpot as its first sales hire and had no experience running a sales team. As he put it himself: “I’ve never done sales before. I’m a mechanical engineer by trade. I wrote code for the first years of my career.” Yet he would go on to serve as SVP of Worldwide Sales and Services, scaling the company’s revenue from $0 to over $100 million and expanding the team from one employee to four hundred and fifty. An MIT-trained engineer by background, Roberge brought a metrics-driven, process-oriented approach to sales that would eventually earn him recognition as one of Forbes’ Top 30 Social Sellers in the World. HubSpot had grown revenues more than 6,000% since 2007 and by 2011 was recognised as the second fastest growing software company and 33rd fastest growing company overall by Inc. 500. The company went public on the New York Stock Exchange in October 2014, raising $125 million in its initial public offering. But that was all later. In those early days, none of that was guaranteed. First, he had to figure out how to actually hire salespeople who could sell.

Link

The Last Nation to Play | Longreads

14-minute read

“This is a special team, man,” he said, without breaking stride. “It’s a special team.”

It was indeed. Aside from Matt, none of these players were from Springdale. Half the team had flown in from places like Virginia and Washington and Pennsylvania. The others had made significantly longer journeys, traveling nearly 6,300 miles over two full days from map-dot islands in the Pacific Ocean. Much of the coaching staff had flown in from the UK.

A passerby peering through the bars of the metal fence would not have thought much of this scene—just another soccer team practicing at a high-school stadium—but had they zoomed in on the intricate blue logos on the breasts of the players’ jerseys, they would have realized the oddity of the team’s presence: This was the Marshall Islands men’s national soccer team. Had the spectator stuck around to watch a few drills, they would have also noticed that these young men, despite their matching uniforms, clearly did not know one another.

Link

Why not Venus? | Mars For The Rest of Us

7-minute read

Venus researchers Janusz Petkowski and Sara Seager have made an intriguing case that all the anomalies I list can be explained by the presence of microorganisms that produce ammonia from nitrogen and water. The ammonia would react with sulfuric acid to create a kind of slurry, accounting for both the depletion of SO2 and the Mode 3 haze. The pH in such a neutralized droplet would be close to 1, a perfectly livable environment for acidophiles we find on Earth. And a byproduct of their metabolism would be molecular oxygen.

The appeal of this theory is that it’s ridiculously easy to test. Unlike Mars, where we have to delve deep underground to hope to find relic life, we can just go look at the clouds on Venus with a party balloon. The mission is simple enough that Petkowski and Seager are flying a private version of it with RocketLab as a side project, funded by an anonymous benefactor.

Link

If America’s So Rich, How’d It Get So Sad? | Derek Thompson

8-minute read

“The United States was a reasonably happy country for a long time,” the University of Chicago economist Sam Peltzman wrote in a 2026 paper. “It is not happy now.”

Crunching data from the General Social Survey, Peltzman documented “a sudden, sharp and historically unprecedented decline in self-reported happiness in the US population” after COVID that “mainly persists” through 2024. He called it a “regime change” in national sentiment. After 50 years of mostly steady levels of self-reported well-being, American happiness plunged. And it’s hardly bounced back at all.

Peltzman’s analysis is not a lonely voice; there is a veritable chorus of gloomy sentiment. This week, the Federal Reserve’s measure of US worker satisfaction fell to its lowest level since the survey began in 2014. One week prior, consumer sentiment had fallen to the lowest level ever recorded in the 70-year history of the University of Michigan economic survey. Once again, the index plunged around 2020 and, like a hiker on the far side of a mountain, continues down step by step. Americans are telling pollsters that they are more depressed about this economy than they were during the depths of the Great Recession or the painful stagflationary years of the 1970s.

[...]

So, those who privilege economic statistics over self-reports might be tempted to summarize the situation this way: America’s resilient economy is a fact, while Americans’ sad-sack survey results are mere irrational feelings. There is something to this; the gap between so-called “hard data” (e.g., the unemployment rate) and “soft data” (e.g., a survey) is certainly wide and widening. But a feeling is an important kind of fact. Feelings don’t just shape consumer behavior. They shape political attitudes; and attitudes influence voting; and voting determines policies; and policies shape the economy. To understand the future of the US economy and the United States writ large, one cannot afford a haughty indifference toward sentiment.

And on the sentiment front, what we’ve got are four survey results—four facts, you might even say, of American lugubriousness—all of which point to one unmistakable conclusoin. This decade has been the very opposite of “roaring.” We are mired instead in the Tragic Twenties.

Link

How to Crash | Pangyrus

7-minute read

On the morning of the ceremony, Joe handed me a tailored blue tweed jacket and an orange knit tie to match his own. I put them on and clambered into the back of a rented 1967 Volkswagen camper van with Joe’s parents, two sisters, and Euan Kennedy — driver and urologist.

The van was cream with white leather benches, silver buckets for champagne, and no seat belts. We rattled along country roads and onto the motorway. We made small talk and I tried to remember the outline of my speech for later.

A mile short of the church, on a roundabout, moving around twenty miles an hour, the chatter was replaced with screaming. For the van door had rattled open and I had fallen out.

Calamities seem to happen in slow motion, then very fast. I remember sliding along smooth white leather as the van banked in the turn, then feeling the door give way and swing open, and then falling backwards out of it as though I were a figment in someone else’s dream. My head smashed into the road.

After that there is a gap in my memory.

Link

An Eccentric Tycoon Left a Fortune to the Winner of a Baby-Making Contest. The Great Stork Derby Divided Canadians During the Great Depression | Smithsonian Magazine

7-minute read

Before his sudden death on Halloween in 1926, the wealthy Toronto lawyer and financier Charles Vance Millar built a reputation as a bachelor and a prankster. In one of his favorite practical jokes, he would place money on a sidewalk and hide nearby, roaring with laughter at people’s reactions as they contemplated their next move. Undoubtedly eccentric, Millar amassed a fortune by investing in breweries, real estate and infrastructure. He once modernized a stagecoach company in western Canada by replacing horses with automobiles.

Millar never married or had children, and he had no living relatives when he suffered a fatal heart attack at age 72. His death “proved to be the beginning of a posthumous career that eclipsed everything he had accomplished in his lifetime,” attorney and author Mark M. Orkin wrote in a 1981 book. Millar’s last will and testament contained a number of strange provisions, but the most peculiar was the one that launched the so-called Great Stork Derby.

The clause in question established a competition among Toronto mothers that would allocate a portion of Millar’s estate to the participant who gave birth to the most children over the next ten years. The bequest was valued at about 500,000 Canadian dollars—equivalent to nearly 9 million Canadian dollars today. In the case of a tie, those funds would be divided equally among the winners.

Link

The Shocking Secrets of Madison Square Garden’s Surveillance Machine | WIRED

20-minute read

Her movements were tracked, over and over. When she sat down. When she ordered a drink. When she went to the bathroom. When she took the elevator. Nina Richards went to New York Knicks games quite a bit, and the security forces at Madison Square Garden used the arena’s network of cameras to follow her.

New Yorkers have known for a long time that going to a game or concert at the Garden meant surrendering some privacy. That, as you watched the show, the Garden in a real sense watched you. Since 2018, there have been reports of the venue deploying face-recognition technology in what critics believe are increasingly intrusive ways. Owner James Dolan has watch lists of basketball fans who have dared criticize his management. He keeps a close eye on his other venues too, including Radio City Music Hall and the Sphere in Las Vegas. Last March, Dolan’s security team blocked a graphic designer from seeing a concert; the designer, years earlier, had printed and sold a half-dozen T-shirts reading “Ban Dolan.” He has locked out whole firms’ worth of lawyers, even keeping out a mom who was trying to take her 9-year-old Girl Scout to a Christmas show at Radio City Music Hall; the mom’s coworker had pissed him off.

[...]

But the true extent of Dolan’s panopticon has only been caught in glimpses. A 2025 lawsuit by a former member of the MSG security team lifted the veil, just a bit. We started our own digging into the Garden’s operations. We discovered that Dolan’s security teams obsessively tracked Nina Richards, a trans woman, over a two-year period, monitoring her movements through the venue down to the second. (WIRED is using a pseudonym in this article out of respect for her privacy.) Dolan’s biometric surveillance is so extensive that a New York City police officer’s photo was added to a face-recognition database, and a child triggered an alert at one of Dolan’s properties. According to that lawsuit and our sources, Dolan’s head of corporate security takes such an expansive view of his mission that his employees will functionally cosplay as cops—patrolling the neighborhood, snooping on protesters if they happen to be in the area. You don’t have to enter a Dolan venue to be under his watch.

Original link | Archive.is link

Creating baby geniuses to thwart the AI threat? (Yes, really.) | Mother Jones

11-minute read

Among the numerous ethical questions raised by genetic engineering is whether its use will effectively create a new hereditary caste system, not unlike the dystopian pecking order in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, where “Alpha” elites rule over the lesser classes. The future that Malcolm Collins describes sounds very much like a society stratified by genetic haves and have-nots: “I think it will be both dramatically less equitable, but dramatically better for the poor individuals in the same way that the United States right now might be less equitable than it would have been at the time of the Revolution,” he says. “But right now, the poorest Americans still have cellphones and computers and refrigerators, right? They’re not dying of cholera in the streets.”

In Benson-Tilsen’s ideal tomorrow, there would be no genotocracy—some of the wunderkinds optimized for superior intelligence will have quashed the threat of advanced AI, and the technology needed to have healthier and smarter babies will be widely accessible and affordable. But current trends—a small group of Silicon Valley titans holding a vast amount of our nation’s technological, political, and financial power—don’t seem to point in that direction. What, I ask him, will stop billionaire investors from hijacking the tech of even the most well-intentioned embryo-­editing entrepreneur? After a long pause, he concedes he doesn’t have a great answer: “It’s an interesting question I haven’t thought that much about.”

Well, perhaps the superhumans will figure it out.

Link

The Stress of Elite Chess Is Wearing Down the Game’s Champions | The Walrus

9-minute read

Maybe, they think, it could be theirs: the world championship, immortality. And then, for all except one, they learn the crushing truth. Someone out there is better.

Life in chess has always been a struggle, never more so than today. During the two-year battle for the 2024 world chess championship, I saw tantrums, I saw tears, I heard one top grandmaster muse about leaving the game for a career in fashion.

Link

The Hardy Men | The New York Review of Books

9-minute read

In 2022 Jonathan Keeperman, then a lecturer in the English department at the University of California, Irvine, who for years had moonlighted as a right-wing Internet provocateur, founded a boutique publisher called Passage Press. His goal, he told Ross Douthat in a New York Times interview last year, was to build a reactionary cultural apparatus that would form an “enduring and meaningful counterweight to a dominant left.”

For too long, he argued, conservatives had stood by stuffily as the left commandeered arts and entertainment and bent mainstream institutions to its ideological will. Keeperman wanted to change that. By drawing on the energies of the so-called New Right and its various overlapping cohorts—red-pilled Silicon Valley types, Dimes Square podcasters and playwrights, manospheric influencers, proselytizers of raw milk—he hoped to show that the right could produce culture that was just as vital, just as possessed of spiritedness and “thymos,” as that produced by the left, if not more so. “If you are telling the truth about the world,” Keeperman told Douthat, “then you are going to make right-wing art.”

[...]

Last year, however, Passage put out what at first seemed like a very different set of books—books beloved by millions of readers around the world, very few of whom, presumably, would consider them far-right texts. In two handsome box sets with illustrated covers by Alex Wisner (a comic artist who has published two graphic novels with the press about an anti-Bolshevik Russian general), Passage released the original versions of the first six Hardy Boys novels, which began entering the public domain in 2023.

Lest anyone think Passage was broadening its curatorial horizons to include nonpolitical material, or simply making a cash grab by appealing to young readers, the press made clear that it considers these tales of sleuthing teen heroes to be of a piece with its revanchist worldview.

Original link | Archive.is link

The Rise & Fall Of ‘Petty Tyrants’ | NOEMA

15-minute read

I have many thoughtful friends who are depressed about the state of the world. I am less depressed than they are — not because I’m an optimist, or because I deny the evil and stupidity in our political system that are causing so much harm, but because I believe history reveals a pattern that leaves reason for hope.

When democratic governments fail to serve their people, voters recognize that something is wrong. Democracy is the best system ever devised for peacefully removing ineffective leaders from power, but some bad leaders, whom I call “petty tyrants,” can undermine the democracy itself.

Petty tyrants are more focused on personal victories than on national priorities. The good news is that they carry within them the seeds of their own destruction. Once we understand their common flaws, it becomes apparent why they eventually fall rapidly from power and leave few changes to government that last. Understanding this pattern can help us recognize a critical feature that distinguishes leaders who damage their nations from those who create lasting good: their relationship to truth.

Link

1 star

What I Learned About Billionaires at Jeff Bezos’s Private Retreat | The Atlantic

6-minute read

In 2018, I was a guest at Jeff Bezos’s Campfire retreat in Santa Barbara, California. It’s an annual event in which the Amazon founder invites 80-plus guests—celebrities, artists, intellectuals, and anyone else he thinks is interesting—to spend three nights at a private resort. I had recently been approached by Amazon about moving my film-and-television business over from Disney, and although I had declined (or maybe because I had declined), Bezos’s team invited me to Campfire, perhaps keen to impress me with the power of his reach.

On a warm October Thursday, a fleet of private jets was dispatched to airports in Van Nuys and New York to shepherd guests to Santa Barbara in style. At that point I had only a vague sense of who else was coming—famous people, rich people, influential people, and me. A guest list, I was told, would be given to us once we arrived. Families were invited; an on-site nanny would be provided for each child.

[...]

The closer I’ve gotten to the world of wealth, the more I understand that being truly rich doesn’t mean amassing enough money to afford superyachts, private jets, or a million acres of land. It means that everything becomes effectively free. Any asset can be acquired but nothing can ever be lost, because for soon-to-be trillionaires, no level of loss could significantly change their global standing or personal power. For them, the word failure has ceased to mean anything.

This sense of invulnerability has deep psychological ramifications. If everything is free and nothing matters, then the world and other people exist only to be acted upon, if they are acknowledged at all. This is different from classic narcissism, in which a grandiose but fragile self-image can mask deep insecurity. What I’m talking about is a self-definition in which the individual grows to the size of the universe, and the universe vanishes. Asked recently if there is any check on his power, President Trump—himself a billionaire, and by far the richest president in American history—said, “Yeah, there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.” Not domestic or international law, not the will of the voters, not God or the centuries-old morality of civic and religious life.

Original link | Archive.is link

The Farmer Signal in Intelligence Appears in East Asia Too: The Rise of the Han | PifferPilfer

5-minute read

In Europe, I previously found a positive association between Early European Farmer / Anatolian farmer ancestry and educational-attainment PGS. That was not just an isolated observation: Akbari et al. later reported a similar farmer-related signal in their ancient-DNA analysis. So the European comparison is not merely that farmers expanded. It is that farmer ancestry appears to carry a detectable positive EA signal.

But Europe is not the only test case. China had its own great Neolithic agricultural cores, especially around the Yellow River and the eastern farming societies of Shandong. If farming populations really carried a distinctive trait profile, we should not expect the signal to stop at the Bosporus. We should see something similar in East Asia.

That is what I find here.

Link

Archaeologists Find Egyptian Mummy Buried With the ‘Iliad’ | New York Times [gift article]

4-minute read

Yes, I sent an article about this last month -- but this piece adds informed speculation about why the Iliad fragment might be buried with the mummy:

“The find is incredibly significant, primarily for the discovery of such a papyrus with Greek literary text in its original context,” said Foy Scalf, an Egyptologist at the University of Chicago. “We have evidence that such Greek literary texts could be used as magical amulets and that Homer was frequently cited in such amulets, as well as in the large handbooks now known as ‘The Greco-Egyptian Formularies.’ The new find directly supports that indirect knowledge.”

[...]

For residents navigating the complex, vibrant crossroads of Roman Egypt, Greek literary papyri may have functioned as a crucial cultural passport, said Anna Dolganov, a historian at the Austrian Archaeological Institute. In Egypt, being Hellenic connoted an exclusive social status and financial privilege — and had to be meticulously documented through genealogies going back across several centuries.

Buried with the dead, the “Iliad” perhaps served as a cheat code for a more comfortable afterlife. Dr. Dolganov wonders if carrying the epic poem was a deliberate strategy to secure entry into the Greek underworld, effectively sidestepping the torturous trials of Egyptian mythology. For these individuals, a Hellenic identity wasn’t just for this world — it was an eternal upgrade, offering a smoother path and higher status in the great beyond.

Original link | Archive.is link

Does Looksmaxxing Give Women the Ick? | Rob Henderson’s Newsletter

3-minute read

Welcome to the weird and twisted philosophy of looksmaxxing, the online subculture devoted to optimizing male appearance through gym routines, skin care, jawline exercises and surgery. Clavicular himself is an advocate of “bonesmashing”, or hitting one’s face repeatedly with a hammer to change the face shape. He told the New York Times that he suspects he is sterile after years of injecting himself with testosterone.

[...]

But, ironically, the very purpose of looksmaxxing, which is designed to attract women to “masculine men”, will not achieve its purpose. Because the harder a young man tries to appeal to women, the more likely he is to appeal to other men instead.

That is the lesson from a recent experiment by the PhD student William Costello. Costello posted two photos side by side on X. One was of Clavicular. The other showed Felix Yongbok Lee, a popular K-pop singer with extremely feminine features. Costello asked his 20,000 followers to pick the more attractive of the two.

Men picked Clavicular. Women, in contrast, preferred Yongbok Lee. This is consistent with studies indicating that men overestimate women’s preferences for highly masculine features.

Some male commenters claimed that the female commenters were lying. This is a comforting belief, allowing men to ignore feedback that contradicts their assumptions.

A much simpler explanation is that women mean what they say.

Link

Neanderthals may have shared key DNA for complex language, reshaping when human speech began | Phys.org

3-minute read

In a first-of-its-kind finding, researchers at University of Iowa Health Care discovered that specific genetic sequences have an outsized impact on humans’ language abilities and that these sequences evolved before humans and Neanderthals diverged.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Could the Girls of Camp Mystic Have Been Saved? | New York Magazine

31-minute read

The women sound like men who have been to war: They can only try to tell you. “It was a place,” says a former camper, “I have been doing my best to re-create in my life wherever I have lived.” And another: “The closest I have felt to God.” “You know,” another alum tells me, “the poignancy of, I, I can’t be a child again. I can’t be innocent like that again. I can’t have my whole life ahead of me again.”

When rain hits New York, Alexa Fleet is transported back to her cabin, Bubble Inn. She had never heard such storms as those, “as if the Earth were releasing everything it had.” They were “terrifying, so loud, so hard, so intense. It imprints on you. I yearn for a storm like that. It felt cleansing.” Those summers, six of them, were raw with “everything a girl feels so deeply at 13.” As a second-grader, she would begin building out a calendar toward summer, x-ing out every day from January until June that she had to wait until camp, when finally the world would not revolve around the needs and achievements of boys. “You’re quiet and smile 11 months of the year,” she said, “but there you were safe — the gates were closed — it was just you and the girls. Your personality could de-thaw.”

[...]

The parents were told to gather at Ingram Elementary, a school 13 miles and a 20-minute drive from the camp. The Childresses arrived a little after 1 p.m., among the first parents to show. There were tables and laptops to log parents in when they arrived and water and clothes and blankets. Matthew began to feel very nervous, though he still knew basically nothing about the scope of the flood that had enveloped the town he was not in. He did not want to wait by a pile of blankets in another town for his missing daughter; he wanted to speed toward the river and start moving trees. But others had tried and gotten nowhere. The roads were blocked, impassable.

Original link | Archive.is link

Redshift, by Elena Saavedra Buckley | Harper’s Magazine

23-minute read

To become a Martian colonist, I first had to fill out a Google Form. It asked me about my aviation know-how, medical training, and experience “working in extreme environments.” I sheepishly wrote “N/A” each time, adding a note that highlighted my cooking and social skills. It turned out that this was okay: I was only going to Utah, after all, and the institution running the show was not a multibillion-dollar federal agency but the Mars Society, a scrappy nonprofit. The organization was founded in 1998 by the aerospace engineer Robert Zubrin to advocate for human settlement of the red planet. In 2002, it opened the Mars Desert Research Station, a simulated Martian settlement—laboratory, theater, and summer camp all at once. Located in a corner of rural southeastern Utah, the MDRS’s environment looks enough like Mars to play the part while still being accessible to participants and potential donors. (Antarctica and the Atacama Desert, arguably the best Martian analogues on Earth, are harder sells.)

[...]

The Mars Society’s simulations, on the other hand, are usually two weeks long. Crew members’ research projects can seem a bit perfunctory, often involving testing gadgets or mimicking the sort of fieldwork that might someday be done on Mars. (This isn’t to say that the longer-term missions always produce mountains of technical research. In Russia, the six crew members played a lot of Guitar Hero, and mission control had to fake a fire to keep them alert.) Most participants are either graduate students or ordinary Mars enthusiasts, the majority of whom pay the Mars Society between $2,000 and $3,500 to attend. Only a handful of them have ever actually made it into space. It wasn’t initially clear to me what, exactly, the organization’s simulation had done to nudge humanity toward the red planet. It seemed more like an elaborate team-building exercise, a logistically complicated and expensive ropes course for space-travel diehards.

Original link | Archive.is link

2 stars

Half A Month Of Consolation Writing Advice | Astral Codex Ten

15-minute read

This month, rationalist institution Lighthaven is running their second Inkhaven, a bootcamp for aspiring bloggers. Participants have to publish a post a day, or they get kicked out.

[...]

I’m too old to manage that pace, but agreed to participate as an advisor. Then I missed the first half of the month because I was on a trip. As compensation, here are fifteen pieces of writing advice for the fifteen days I was absent.

[...]

The English language hates the slightest whiff of dishonesty, even levels so small you wouldn’t naturally notice them yourself. It punishes you by making your writing worse.

I remember asking one of my mentees to take out a tangential paragraph that didn’t really connect to the rest of the argument. They refused, and awkwardly admitted that it was the one thing they really wanted to say with the essay. They’d written the essay about something else, because the other thing was more presentable. Then they’d smuggled their actual point in as a payload. Clever plan, but your readers will notice.

There are countless reasons to lie when you’re writing. Maybe you thought of a clever introduction, but the thing it introduces is 5% different from the thing you really want to say, so you need to be a little vague and smush them together. Maybe you have a great perspective on something which is almost like the topic du jour, and you need to make it sound like it’s exactly the topic du jour to get it published. Maybe you can rebut 99 out of 100 arguments for some stupid evil position that you want to debunk, but it would be embarrassing to leave one hanging, so you smudge it together into the other 99 arguments. English will punish you for all these things. Sometimes there’s no better solution and you have to settle, but your readers will notice.

Link

The Mansion, the Heiress, the Jewel Heist, and Me: A Bel-Air Fairytale | Vanity Fair

7-minute read

In Los Angeles, the night of Friday, December 8, 1961, was appropriately dark and stormy. A tree was downed on Bel Air Road, causing a man on a scooter to crash as he raced around a steep corner. A member of the Bel-Air Patrol later came by to discover the accident and the dazed man on the ground. He helped him up, handed back the white pillow sash he’d been carrying, and, without curiosity or question, sent him on his way.

Meanwhile, 15-year-old Carla Kirkeby was home alone—aside from her family’s sleeping staff—in their approximately 22,000-square-foot residence at 750 Bel Air Road. If the address sounds familiar, it’s because the house’s grand limestone facade, originally designed by architect Sumner Spaulding, was used for exterior shots in the hit ’60s sitcom The Beverly Hillbillies. Once referred to as “the house of the golden doorknobs,” the 10-acre estate, also known as Chartwell, is currently owned by Lachlan Murdoch; he bought it in 2019 for $150 million.

[...]

Discovering a historic jewel heist might easily be the most interesting thing to happen to most people. But the captivating details of Carla’s life threaten to reduce it to a footnote. At 14, she threw a wild rager that ended after a partygoer made off with one of her parents’ prized Christmas presents: a silver platter engraved “to Arnold and Carlotta, from Ron and Nancy.” (The Reagans were the Kirkebys’ next-door neighbors and friends.) At 23, police stopped her for going over 100 miles per hour down the Pacific Coast Highway in a Ferrari 275 GTB4—the same make and model as a missing car that belonged to Sharon Tate, who had recently been murdered by Charles Manson’s followers. She says she once wrested her mother from the notorious clutches of John Paul Getty after what she described as “a mediocre dinner” at the magnate’s Surrey estate. On another England adventure, she strolled into a chauffeured Rolls-Royce in London to find herself face-to-face with a young Mick Jagger. Angelina Jolie’s mother was her children’s babysitter.

Original link | Archive.is link

If we avoid sadness in life, why do we seek it in art? | Psyche Ideas

6-minute read

As an opera singer, I’ve noticed that some of my favourite soprano arias are incredibly sad: about dying, losing the love of your life to someone else, or even lamenting that you’ve been cursed by an evil sorceress. When it comes to art, I’m far from the only one drawn to dark themes. From Taylor Swift’s breakup anthems to Picasso’s Blue Period paintings to poignant movies like The Notebook (2004), many people seek out art that expresses profound feelings of sadness. Maybe you do too?

It’s a phenomenon that has long puzzled psychologists and philosophers alike. Given that we usually dread sadness and strive to avoid it because it feels so bad – from painful conversations to the grief of loss – why do we actively seek it in art? Why do we pick films that we know will leave us sobbing in the movie theatre, or stream Sad Girl playlists carefully curated to provoke sorrow and melancholy? Why, when we look at paintings depicting human suffering, do we find them beautiful?

Link

Fortress Yellowstone | In These Times

16-minute read

Wild Eagle Mountain is one of a growing number of billionaire-owned ranches in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, which encompasses some 12 million to 22 million acres (depending on how you measure) and supports the largest concentration of wildlife in the contiguous United States. As such places grow increasingly rare—a 2021 study estimated that only 3% of the Earth’s land area retains all of the species that lived there 500 years ago — proximity to Yellowstone has become an increasingly valuable commodity. In recent years, the ultra-rich have been buying up slopeside mansions, frontage on trout rivers and great swaths of land here in one of the last nearly intact ecosystems left on Earth. And it’s not only in Montana: This influx of wealth has made Teton County, Wyo. — on the other side of this ecosystem — the richest and most unequal county in the United States.

Link

A day with England’s hunt saboteurs | Dispatch

7-minute read

“A man unlike any other is roaming in the pastures,” a trapper complains to the king in The Epic of Gilgamesh. “He helps the wild game to escape; he fills in my pits, and pulls up my traps.”

Four thousand years after humanity chiselled its first story in cuneiform, I’m in the car park of Hawkesbury Upton’s village hall. I’m about to meet Weasel, who’s not a man “unlike any other”. She’s a retired teacher in her seventies who enjoys playing golf and singing in a choir.

Like Enkidu in the ancient tale, however, she spends much of her time liberating animals, filling in pits, and pulling up traps. Weasel is a hunt saboteur: one of hundreds across the UK who, since 1964, have staged weekly interventions in the countryside to save foxes, mink, hares and stags from grisly fates.

In an hour’s time, horses and hounds will sweep across 54,000 acres of South Gloucestershire countryside for the Beaufort Hunt’s “closing meet” – the final “trail hunting” outing of the season, and possibly the last ever. If the government gets its way, this technically legal practice, in which hounds are said to follow pre-laid trails of fox urine rather than live animals, will be banned.

Original link | Archive.is link

Furniture in the Closet | News Items

11-minute read

The Wall Street Journal had some fun a while back, reporting on a fraudster’s guilty plea to crimes that its own columnist, Jason Zweig, solved all by himself. In a series starting in 2024, Zweig uncovered a onetime broker, Paul Regan, who had conned some 300 people out of more than $50 million, by promising guaranteed returns of up to 17.1 percent per year.

“Any interest you earn is ‘locked in’ and can’t be lost,” said the ads. Zweig knew it was too good to be true, so he made phone calls, stood by his guns, and bit by bit the whole scheme unravelled. Regan, it turned out, had been banned for life from the U.S. securities industry, but he had moved to Medellín and started over.

Wouldn’t it be great if there were more watchdogs like Zweig, warning people away from too-good-to-be-true offers? That’s especially true in the life-and-annuity business. The promises can run for decades, a good deal today can turn into a bad bet by the time you need it, and the financial statements that could steer you out of harm’s way are either hidden behind a paywall or nonexistent.

[...]

In the past, you could rely on state insurance regulators to make sure your carrier was solvent. Even now, the Delaware Insurance Department, Brighthouse’s primary state regulator, must bless the Aquarian buyout before it can be done. But how will Delaware decide? If you look carefully at regulatory filings, you’ll see that Delaware hasn’t been holding Brighthouse to its own solvency rules for years.

Link

So What if They Have My Data? | Card Catalog

10-minute read

Sometime in the mid-2000s, most of us started handing over pieces of ourselves to the internet without giving the exchange a second thought. We created email accounts, signed up for social media, bought things online, downloaded apps, swiped loyalty cards, connected fitness trackers, stored photos in the cloud, and agreed to terms of service that almost none of us have ever read in full. We did this thousands of times over two decades and counting, and each interaction felt small enough to be inconsequential.

But the accumulation is enormous. More than 6 billion people now use the internet, and each one makes an estimated 5,000 digital interactions per day. Most of those interactions happen without our conscious awareness: a GPS ping, a page load, an app opening, a browser cookie refreshing, a device checking in with a cell tower. The average person in 2010 made an estimated 298 digital interactions per day. In fifteen years, that number multiplied more than sixteenfold. Those digital interactions produce records that can persist indefinitely, stored, copied, indexed, bought, sold, and combined with other records to build profiles of extraordinary detail.

Link

High Amplitude Disagreeableness | Stay SaaSy

3-minute read

True startup people are one of the most important advantages that many tech companies have. Startup people are aggressive, entrepreneurial, and often bring a dynamism that allows them to cut through significant roadblocks. When there’s a large platform shift (e.g. the AI wave that is currently occurring), they’re often literally the only people at your organization that can help you transition into the new world. There is a reason that many sharp investors strongly prefer to bet on founder-led companies and their startup-oriented teams, particularly during times of extreme change.

[...]

Some people are basically argumentative and combative all the time: high frequency. Others are actually very genial and (usually) conflict-avoidant: low frequency. That’s just human nature.

But all startup people share an ability to reach an extremely high amplitude of disagreeableness – if you’re really wrong, they will fucking nuke you from orbit, and they are willing to get in front of the entire company and call you an idiot because it doesn’t bother them one bit if there’s an audience when they push the big red button. One of the defining traits of a startup person is their willingness to disagree publicly, even with senior people, and to remain insistent over a long period of time – for example, fighting to change a bad process or build the right product even if it takes years. When you see a mid-level person politely but firmly disagree with some member of the C-suite in front of a hundred people, you’re seeing the startup spirit at work.

Link

1 star

#110. “Extended Childhood Disorder”: An Alternative Way of Understanding Teen Suffering | Play Makes Us Human

4-minute read

Teenagers in the United States and many other modern nations are suffering psychologically at tragically high rates. In the most recent National Comorbidity Survey, 49.5% of U.S. teens met the criteria for diagnosis of at least one psychological “disorder” using the official diagnostic manual of the American Psychiatric Association (APA).

I put “disorder” in quotation marks in the above, as an implied objection to the APA assumption that the psychological disturbances, like physical diseases, lie in the person.

[...]

Epstein and his colleagues suggest that the primary cultural shifts that led to teen problems are those that cut them out of adult society and meaningful adultlike activity. In farming communities, where teens take on ever more responsibility for the family farm, or in craft communities where teens become apprentices, working along with adults, there is little if any evidence that the teenage years are more problematic than any other years. The problem, according to Epstein, is that we continue to treat teens as children long past the time when they are ready to be treated more like adults and be integrated into the adult world. We hold them back.

Link

The California town with less than 30 residents begging for young people to move in | SFGATE

9-minute read

But Darwin never became a ghost town, and at one point, even appeared poised to become one of the state’s next booming metropolises. It began as a bustling mining town founded in 1874, shortly after the area was found to be rich in silver and lead. Named for Darwin French, a prospector who had led expeditions in the area, the town was flooded by eager adventurers hoping to strike it rich. The boom didn’t last long, with the bulk of residents leaving by the late 19th century as markets fluctuated and resources became scarce in the harsh desert conditions. Those who stayed were dealt an even bigger blow in the 1930s, when state officials decided to reroute the main road on the way to what was then Death Valley National Monument away from the town.

Link

Weapons, Wealth, and the Fates of Societies | Marginal Revolution

1-minute read

Why do weapons sustain durable peace in some societies but provoke perpetual violence in others? We develop a theory in which the value of human life and the frequency of violence are jointly determined by weapons technology and economic conditions. Lethal weapons deter conflict but raise mortality, taxing the future returns to investing in one’s livelihood. When those returns are high, deterrence dominates and peace and investment reinforce each other. When those returns are low, the mortality tax dominates, agents divest from the future, the value of life falls, and violence deepens, a trap that deadlier weapons worsen.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

I Found It: The Best Free Restaurant Bread in America | The Atlantic

29-minute read

Here is where the notion for the undertaking came from: Tucked within the viscera of the continental United States is a restaurant that gives away superb free bread. Every time I have eaten it (before this past year, three times total), I have said aloud (to my husband, who did not care), “This is the best free restaurant bread in America.” The thought made me feel the way you do when you realize you were just a half a moment away from being plowed by a car, and were spared only by a chance nanosecond of dawdling before stepping into the street: giddy and flabbergasted and grateful to be alive. It seemed incredible, but also possible, that this really could be the best free restaurant bread in America. What if it was? Even more dizzyingly, what if it wasn’t? What if—unfathomable—someone else was giving away an even better bread for free? The thought drove me crazy. I begged for the opportunity to investigate.

Original link | Archive.is link

The Car-Crash Conspiracy | New Yorker

30-minute read

About a decade ago, however, the city of New Orleans began experiencing accidents involving eighteen-wheelers with a frequency that was anomalous—and alarming. The sudden spike in big-rig collisions occurred in just one area: a fourteen-mile stretch of Interstate 10 that runs through a neighborhood on the outskirts of the city known as New Orleans East. Starting around 2015, scores of accidents involving tractor-trailers and passenger cars were reported in the area each year, often resulting in damage to the cars and medical care for occupants who reported injuries. In 2004, there were sixty-nine sideswipe accidents in New Orleans in which a passenger vehicle collided with a large truck. By 2017, the annual number had nearly tripled. When insurance adjusters examined the roadway where the crashes were happening, there were no obvious hazards—like faulty lighting or an especially steep grade—that could account for this newfound profusion. For truckers, that stretch of New Orleans East had become an asphalt Bermuda Triangle—a treacherous gantlet best avoided.

Another confounding feature of the crashes was that, in virtually all of them, the cars contained multiple occupants. For years, the typical number of passengers in a car wreck in Louisiana had been consistent, averaging 1.4. But, when the frequency of accidents involving large trucks started to climb in New Orleans, so, too, did the number of occupants. Suddenly, it became typical for at least three people to be in a car at the time of a collision. When Helmut Schneider, a business professor at Louisiana State University, calculated the likelihood of such a rise in accidents involving so many people taking place in such a contained geographic area, he determined that the odds of this all happening by chance were one in seven hundred and fifty trillion.

Original link | Archive.is link

2 stars

The man who blew up a nuclear power station and disappeared | The Guardian

15-minute read

When a foil snaps, it makes a sound like a lightbulb being smashed, and then there is a blade of steel in the air that nobody is controlling, and it is moving fast. The broken tip went through Bonfil’s chest, beneath his right arm. His mouth filled with blood. He was on the floor in five seconds. Medical students were in the room but there was nothing anyone could do. He died on the way to hospital.

A Johannesburg magistrate ruled it accidental. Bonfil’s mother flew out from England and told Wilkinson she now thought of him as her son. He spent time with the family in England afterwards.

I asked Wilkinson, not long ago, how it had affected him.

“Badly,” he said. And then he stopped talking.

Eleven years after the incident, the same man, who had learned what physics does to a body, was working as a contract engineer at the Koeberg nuclear power station, 19 miles north of Cape Town. He was furious with the regime that had conscripted him, sent him to fight a war in Angola he didn’t believe in, and made his country a pariah. In an act of folly or courage, in December 1982 he walked four bombs into South Africa’s only nuclear power station, weeks before it was due to come online. On 17 December, he pulled the pins, made it out of the control room, had a farewell drink with his colleagues, and then disappeared.

Link

Let’s talk space toilets! | Mars For The Rest of Us

7-minute read

While capsules like Soyuz and the Crew Dragon are equipped with a rudimentary toilet kit, astronauts use a mix of drugs, diet, and occult knowledge passed down the generations to keep from having to use it. It can take more than two days for a Crew Dragon capsule to reach the space station, but the crew in the cramped spacecraft is expected to save the real fireworks for the relative comfort of the space station toilet.

The longest anyone has attempted to hold it in space is Frank Borman, on Gemini 7. Stuck in a two-man capsule the size of a phone booth, Borman was determined to get through his two-week mission without releasing the hounds.

Link

Reluctantly Influential: Inside Lenny Rachitsky’s Demandingly Chill Life | First Round

18-minute read

Lenny’s Newsletter has 1.2M subscribers. It’s the top business newsletter on Substack and is top four in publications in the US. Lenny’s Podcast has over 500K YouTube subscribers and each episode gets 100-200K downloads. The sheer volume of what’s in his orbit is impressive on its own: ~25 pieces of content per month across his newsletter, podcast, community wisdom emails and the two other podcasts now on his network, “How I AI” and “The Skip.” He curates and frequently updates a list of partners for Lenny’s Product Pass and maintains its infrastructure, has a thriving 40K-person community and has even put on a 1,200-person conference in San Francisco, Lenny and Friends Summit.

All of this didn’t just happen to him. Nothing is an accident, even if he sometimes makes it sound that way.

Link

How to walk through walls | Escaping Flatland

7-minute read

In March 1991, Robert Rodriguez, then 22 years old, decided to write and shoot three feature-length home movies to gain experience making full-length films, in case he ever received an offer to direct a real one.

Nine months later, having finished El Mariachi, the first part of his planned trilogy, Rodriguez found himself in the office of Robert Newman, a Hollywood agent. Watching the trailer Rodriguez had cut, Newman, who would go on to sell the movie to Columbia in a deal worth $1.8 million, asked:

“How much did it cost [to make] again?”

“$7,000.”

“Really? That’s pretty good . . . most trailers usually cost between $20,000 and $30,000.”

“No,” Rodriguez said, “the whole movie cost $7,000.”

In nine months, he had written, directed, and sold a 90-minute action film that cost a third of what a film trailer would. How was that possible? At the time, the cost of film stock alone would normally run into several hundred thousand dollars for an action film like El Mariachi.

[...]

Most systems can be viewed at multiple levels. There is a superficial system which pretends to be made of one thing (walls, hens). But actually, it is really made of something else (bits, memory allocations). And if you learn to understand that underlying system, you can find ways to use the lower-level details to steer the system in a way that looks incomprehensible to those who only see the more superficial system.

Link

The Mystery in the Medicine Cabinet | Asterisk

10-minute read

Lots of people die after overdosing on acetaminophen (paracetamol, often sold as Tylenol or Panadol). In the U.S., it’s estimated to cause 56,000 emergency department visits, 2,600 hospitalizations, and 500 deaths per year. Acetaminophen has a scarily narrow therapeutic window. The instructions on the package say it’s okay to take up to four grams per day. If you take eight grams, your liver could fail and you could die.

Meanwhile, it seems to be really hard to kill yourself by overdosing on ibuprofen (Advil, Nurofen, Motrin, Brufen). In 2006, Wood et al. searched the medical literature and found 10 documented cases in history. Nine of those cases involved complicating factors, and in the 10th, a woman took the equivalent of more than 500 standard (200mg) pills.

[...]

But guess what? My logic was wrong and what I was doing was stupid. I’m now convinced that for most people in most circumstances, acetaminophen is safer than ibuprofen, provided you use it as directed. I think most doctors agree with this. In fact, I think many doctors think it’s obvious.

Link

The Tragedy of Mrs. Dr. Seuss | Dispatches from the Rare Book Trade

8-minute read

Unless you are very deep into children’s books, you’ve probably never thought much about Helen Palmer. I hadn’t either, until I bought inscribed copies of two of her books. Then I fell into the quicksand of research that so many antiquarian booksellers get sucked into.

I thought you might also be interested in the story of the woman behind Dr. Seuss and everything she did so that millions of us could delight in The Cat in the Hat and Green Eggs and Ham.

Link

Marriage over, €100,000 down the drain: the AI users whose lives were wrecked by delusion | The Guardian

7-minute read

Towards the end of 2024, Dennis Biesma decided to check out ChatGPT. The Amsterdam-based IT consultant had just ended a contract early. “I had some time, so I thought: let’s have a look at this new technology everyone is talking about,” he says. “Very quickly, I became fascinated.”

Biesma has asked himself why he was vulnerable to what came next. He was nearing 50. His adult daughter had left home, his wife went out to work and, in his field, the shift since Covid to working from home had left him feeling “a little isolated”. He smoked a bit of cannabis some evenings to “chill”, but had done so for years with no ill effects. He had never experienced a mental illness. Yet within months of downloading ChatGPT, Biesma had sunk €100,000 (about £83,000) into a business startup based on a delusion, been hospitalised three times and tried to kill himself.

Link

Amazon’s Durability | Stratechery

9-minute read

Now, ten years later, we are here, with the official unveiling of Amazon Supply Chain Services, and I think the time frame is an important one: Amazon, more than any other company, actually operates with decade-long timeframes, consistently making real-world investments at massive scale that (1) convert their marginal costs into capital costs and (2) gain leverage on those capital costs by selling them to other businesses.

This is, by the way, still a story about AI.

Link

Gamer’s Dilemma | LRB Blog

4-minute read

Donald Trump and his secretary of war, Pete Hegseth, both former television personalities, have demonstrated that you can launch a full-scale war with all the fun of a game. In early March, the White House and Pentagon circulated official hype videos of Operation Epic Fury. Footage of strikes on Iran was interlaid with clips from the games Call of Duty, Wii Sports and Grand Theft Auto and the movies Top Gun, Braveheart and Gladiator, punctuated by comic book onomatopoeia. In the run up to the attacks, the US Office of the Under Secretary of War for Research and Engineering boasted in manosphere-speak: ‘Low cortisol. Locked in. Lethalitymaxxing.’

Emmanuel Macron has chided Trump for being too flippant in his press conferences and online ravings: ‘When you want to be serious you don’t say every day the opposite of what you said the day before … And maybe you shouldn’t be speaking every day.’

Link

Rogue States | News Items

4-minute read

The U.S. went to war with Iran because the Trump administration decided a rogue state that regularly threatens the U.S. can’t be allowed to have a nuclear weapon alongside a missile program capable of delivering that weapon to American soil.

Most people seem to have forgotten, though, that there already is a rogue state with an estimated 50 nuclear warheads and counting, as well as a missile program on its way to being able to deliver one of those warheads to the American homeland.

That rogue state is North Korea, and it is getting little attention for the nuclear threat it already poses while time, attention and billions of dollars are focused on the nuclear threat Iran might pose, someday. Don’t take my word for it; President Trump’s own national defense strategy, released early this year, is pretty blunt about the danger from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, also known as North Korea: “The DPRK’s nuclear forces are increasingly capable of threatening the U.S. Homeland. These forces are growing in size and sophistication, and they present a clear and present danger of nuclear attack on the American Homeland.”

Link

How an unappetizing shrub became dozens of different vegetables | Works in Progress

4-minute read

Every crop we consume came from a wild ancestor. Through breeding, people selected for bigger grains, juicier fruit, more branches, or shorter stems – gradually turning wild plants into improved yet recognizable versions of their originals. The rare exception is Brassica oleracea, wild cabbage: the origin of cabbage, bok choy, collard greens, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cauliflower, and much else.

Link

1 star

The Science Behind Honey’s Eternal Shelf Life | Smithsonian Magazine

3-minute read

Modern archeologists, excavating ancient Egyptian tombs, have often found something unexpected amongst the tombs’ artifacts: pots of honey, thousands of years old, and yet still preserved. Through millennia, the archeologists discover, the food remains unspoiled, an unmistakable testament to the eternal shelf-life of honey.

Link

New Kind of CRISPR Could Treat Viral Infection and Cancer by Shredding Sick Cells’ DNA | University of Utah Health

4-minute read

A new kind of CRISPR that destroys cells rather than gene editing them has shown potential for killing sick cells while leaving healthy cells untouched.

Link

Will AI kill the research paper? | Marginal Revolution

1-minute read

Ultimately, why not just build a “meta-paper,” using AI, to answer any possible question about the subject area under consideration. This meta-paper would allow the reader, using AI, to make many sorts of modifications and additions to the basic work. The meta-paper also would allow the reader to add new data, to run additional robustness checks, and to do whatever else you might think of. Once again, the canonical version of the paper evolves away.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

AI got the blame for the Iran school bombing. The truth is far more worrying | The Guardian

12-minute read

In 2018, more than 4,000 Google employees signed a letter opposing the company’s contract to build artificial intelligence for the Pentagon’s targeting systems. Workers organised a walk out. Engineers quit. And Google ultimately abandoned the contract. Palantir Technologies, a data analytics company and defence contractor co-founded by Peter Thiel, took it over and spent the next six years building Maven into a targeting infrastructure that pulls together satellite imagery, signals intelligence and sensor data to identify targets and carry them through every step from first detection to the order to strike.

The building in Minab had been classified as a military facility in a Defense Intelligence Agency database that, according to CNN, had not been updated to reflect that the building had been separated from the adjacent Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps compound and converted into a school, a change that satellite imagery shows had occurred by 2016 at the latest. A chatbot did not kill those children. People failed to update a database, and other people built a system fast enough to make that failure lethal.

Link

The Memory Maker | Longreads

13-minute read

My wife insists we once took a yoga class together, early in our relationship. She remembers the teacher vividly (a French acrobat, rainbow dreads, apparently quite a character), where we sat (to the left of the door), and the color of the yoga mats (teal). I insist she is misremembering: I have never been to a yoga class, even to this day. I scrolled back years through my phone’s location history once to settle it, but we’d started dating not long after the iPhone came out, and if the data ever existed, it was gone. The yoga story comes up every few years, but we never resolve it. It is probably unresolvable. As a neuroscientist, I know how these things happen—the encoding mishaps, the source confusion, the neuroscience of how two people can end up telling different stories about the same afternoon. This knowledge has never once brought us closer to agreeing.

I was thinking about this story when I heard something strange from a neighborhood friend of mine, Andrew Deutsch, who was using OpenAI’s Sora app. Sora, if you aren’t familiar, worked like this: You would record your face, say a few numbers, rotate your head left to right. Moments later, you would have an AI video replica of yourself, a self-deepfake, insertable into any scenario you can prompt the AI to produce. Scuba diving with SpongeBob. Dancing K-pop style in a futuristic cityscape. You could then share your videos with your friends and scroll through the videos of others, in what is often described as a “TikTok for deepfakes.” Sora hit one million downloads in only five days. Six months later, OpenAI shut it down, reportedly redirecting resources toward coding tools ahead of a planned IPO. Consider this, then, a eulogy for Sora, a technology with the lifespan of an off-Broadway flop that, in its brief and ignominious run, exposed a crack in human cognition that the next self-deepfake app will surely exploit.

Link

Capitalism and Modernity | Marginal Revolution

3-minute read

Jesús Fernández-Villaverde, one of the few economists in the world equally at home solving stochastic dynamic optimization problems as with sociological theory and history, has an excellent series of twitter posts on capitalism and modernity.

[...]

What strikes me is that most critics of “capitalism” (whatever “capitalism” might mean, and regardless of the value of those critiques) are really critics of modernity, understood as the organization of society around technology, formal institutions, and rational criteria.

Link

2 stars

How the hypercuriosity of ADHD may have helped humans thrive | Aeon

9-minute read

This little dance isn’t unusual for me and the millions of other people who can spend hours in deep, almost joyful focus when a question grabs our attention, but who can also derail ourselves completely when we hear about a shiny new idea. For a long time, I thought this was a personal failure of discipline, a quirk I needed to manage better. It’s only when I started working at the ADHD Research Lab at King’s College London that I came to believe it might be something else entirely.

I’m a cognitive neuroscientist using behavioural experiments, eye-tracking and EEG to examine how attention is drawn toward some signals and away from others. In retrospect, the irony isn’t lost on me that I spent years studying attention without applying the same analytic lens to myself. To understand why I’d dismissed my own experience for so long, it helps to look at how ADHD is officially defined.

Link

Sleeping Beauty | Women* Write the Balkans

11-minute read

Sometimes, when I go back home to Split, I watch the old tapes of my sister and me as children. It’s a ritual my mother and my partner adore. We connect the old VHS, put in a random tape, and go back in time. My parents filmed everything; the most mundane, wonderful days of my childhood are always there for me to revisit, curated moments unmarred by imprecision of memory. There I am, singing and twirling and exclaiming precocious things to my father as he films, preserved on tape for reevaluation. The older I am, the more I see. So, I watch again, learning anew about who I was and who I might become.

[...]

I was seven when I became aware of my longing for beautiful girls. All princesses fascinated me, but one stood out even more than Ariel. She was a beautiful blond girl on the kitchen towel my grandmother had placed above the stove, just out of my reach. It was just a dish cloth, but I couldn’t look away. “Please can I have her,” I would ask my grandmother whenever I went upstairs. Grandma would laugh and say “no” as she had already done so many times.

Link

Tim Cook’s Impeccable Timing | Stratechery

7-minute read

It’s the nature of business that the eulogy for a chief executive doesn’t happen when they die, but when they retire, or, in the case of Apple CEO Tim Cook, announce that they will step up to the role of Executive Chairman on September 1. The one morbid exception is when a CEO dies on the job — or quits because they are dying — and the truth of the matter is that that is where any honest recounting of Cook’s incredibly successful tenure as Apple CEO, particularly from a financial perspective, has to begin.

The numbers, to be clear, are extraordinary. Cook became CEO of Apple on August 24, 2011, and in the intervening 15 years revenue has increased 303%, profit 354%, and the value of Apple has gone from $297 billion to $4 trillion, a staggering 1,251% increase.

Link

What Happened With Mars Sample Return? (I) | Mars For The Rest of Us

7-minute read

It’s not clear whether to blame Trump, Musk, NASA, or Mars itself for the collapse of a flagship mission.

[...]

Say you want to study a bunch of alien rocks. Our planet is rich in scientists and sophisticated rock-examining machinery, so one approach is to put them all on a rocket and send them to where the rocks are. But our best machines are big and too delicate to fit on a rocket, and the scientists themselves are fragile—we have managed to keep a few of them alive in low Earth orbit, but they struggle to get any science done there.

So another idea is to bring rocks back home. And so sample return has been a top goal of planetary science for thirty years or more.

There have been some successes! Most famously, the Apollo astronauts brought back a few hundred kilograms of moon rocks. In 2004, a mission called Stardust flew past the comet Wild 2 and brought back dust grains from the comet’s coma. In 2005, the Japanese Hayabusa probe landed on an asteroid called 25143 Itokawa and brought back a little surface dust for study. Its successor, Hayabusa2, did the same for an asteroid called 162173 Ryugu in 2018. And in 2023, a mission called OSIRIS-REx returned to Earth carrying a sample from the asteroid 101955 Bennu.

Investigations from these missions have been fruitful and have built expectations for a Mars sample return mission, which would bring the full power of Earth laboratories to bear on some astrobiologically interesting rocks the Perseverance rover found on Mars. The circumstantial evidence for early life on Mars is now strong, and there’s a widespread hope that analyzing samples on Earth would have spectacular results, more than enough to galvanize public support for future Mars missions.

Link

Will Americans want more housing if it looks prettier? | Noahpinion

5-minute read

First of all, I’m skeptical that regular Americans actually like the kinds of building styles that intellectuals often yearn for. If you plunk down old-looking European-style buildings in the middle of Houston or Seattle, people tend to ridicule them as cheesy and inauthentic. The typical insult is “pastiche”, a derogatory term for a style that jumbles and mixes old European styles (even though, as Samuel Hughes points out, mixing and matching older ideas is exactly how classic European building styles were created in the first place).

[...]

Nor is ornamental architecture necessarily what makes people love a city. Traditionalists may sigh over old European styles, and urbanists may salivate over the superilles of Barcelona, but the city that has captured the hearts of Americans in recent years is Tokyo. Downtown Tokyo is a forest of electric lights, strung up along the sides of stubby concrete mid-rises called zakkyo buildings. There’s nary a fancy cornice to be found; instead, the beauty comes from the bright cheery emblems of commerce.

Link

It Haunted Your Childhood Video Store. You Were Probably Convinced It Was Real. It Was—More Than You’d Like. | Slate

7-minute read

Some objects take up a place in memory so tangible it’s as if you could reach right into your mind and retrieve them from the past. For me, one of them is a black plastic case about the size and shape of a hardcover book, its edges rough and worn with frequent handling. On the front, large enough to be seen across the aisle of a video store, is a grinning skull, and above that, in large red letters, are the words Faces of Death. But what looms largest in my mind is the handwritten note Scotch-taped to the outside of the flimsy slipcover: “ADULTS ONLY—MUST BE 18 TO RENT.”

[...]

As it happens, much of what appears in Faces of Death is not real, beginning with those names. Both Alan Black and Conan LeCilaire—the latter meant to sound like the word killer in a French accent—were pseudonyms for John Alan Schwartz, a young TV editor in Southern California who’d been approached by a Japanese company to make an American version of a so-called shockumentary, like 1962’s notorious Mondo Cane, focused exclusively on death. Like other movies in this new “mondo” subgenre, named for that influential Italian film, Faces of Death presented itself as educational fare, an anthropological study of different cultures’ approach to mortality, hosted by the stern-voiced Dr. Francis Gröss. But it took that framing no more seriously than it did its narrator’s last name, another pseudonym for the actor (an unknown named Michael Carr) who played the part.

Link

1 star

‘They’re gonna make me cry’: I competed at a speed puzzling championship | The Guardian

6-minute read

I have been a lifelong jigsaw puzzle lover. But in recent years, I have observed the quintessential way to slowly pass time transform into a competitive sport. So I traveled to the USA Jigsaw Nationals to test my skill against the best puzzlers in the country.

Link

Miso Is Not a Soup | Marc Matsumoto

4-minute read

I often hear people say “miso” when they mean “miso soup.” If the only place you’ve encountered miso is in soup, the two naturally blur together. But it’s a bit like saying “flour” when you mean “bread.” Miso is an ingredient, not a soup, and once you start seeing it that way, a whole world of possibilities opens up.

Link

I Bought Friendster for $30k — Here’s What I’m Doing With It | Medium

3-minute read

The domain name friendster.com was registered on March 22 2002. After the site shut down in 2015, the domain did not resolve for 8 years. However, in October 2023 I noticed that the domain name was resolving once again, but it was showing a lot of popup ads. I was curious who owned it, so I looked at the WHOIS info and recognized the owner as a customer of park.io, a company I founded in 2014, and that I had corresponded with him previously over email.

I reached out to him and said I was interested to buy the domain. He told me he had bought it for $8k and now was making ad revenue from the existing traffic. He bought it at gname.com, a site that hosts expired domain name auctions where you can buy prerelease domains from various Chinese/Asian registrars.

Original link | Archive.is link

Sabastian Sawe breaks two-hour barrier to make history in London Marathon | The Guardian

3-minute read

He came. He Sawe. He conquered. Not so very long ago, the idea of anyone running an official marathon in under two hours lurked only in the realms of the fantastical and theoretical: part holy grail, part scientific curiosity.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

The laid-off lawyers and PhDs training AI to steal their careers | The Verge

17-minute read

The LinkedIn post seemed like yet another scam job offer, but Katya was desperate enough to click. After college, she’d struggled to make a living as a freelance journalist, gone to grad school, then pivoted to what she hoped would be a more stable career in content marketing — only to find AI had automated much of the work. This company was called Crossing Hurdles, and it promised copywriting jobs starting at $45 per hour.

Katya clicked and was taken to a page for another company, called Mercor, where she was instructed to interview on-camera with an AI named Melvin. “It just seemed like the sketchiest thing in the world,” Katya says. She closed the tab. But a few weeks later, still unemployed, she got a message inviting her to apply to Mercor. This time, she looked up the company. Mercor, it seemed, sold data to train AI, and she was being recruited to create that data. “My job is gone because of ChatGPT, and I was being invited to train the model to do the worst version of it imaginable,” she says. The idea depressed her. But her financial situation was increasingly dire, and she had to find a new place to live in a hurry, so she turned on her webcam and said “hello” to Melvin.

It was a strange, if largely pleasant, experience. Manifesting on Katya’s laptop as a disembodied male voice, Melvin seemed to have actually read her résumé and asked specific questions about it. A few weeks later, Katya, who like most workers in this story asked to use a pseudonym out of fear of retaliation, received an email from Mercor offering her a job. If she accepted, she should sign the contract, submit to a background check, and install monitoring software onto her computer. She signed immediately.

Original link | Archive.is link

China and the Future of Science | The Scholar’s Stage

9-minute read

Ask any scientist who has gone to China in the past three years to visit academic colleagues and they will tell you how astounded they are at the quality of the laboratory equipment and machinery that their Chinese colleagues have access to. If in the not-so-distant past Chinese localities competed with each other to lay the most asphalt, now that funding pours into laboratory equipment, scientific instruments, and advanced scientific facilities. Thus China now has the world’s most sensitive ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray detector, the world’s largest and most sensitive radio telescope, the world’s strongest steady-state magnetic field, the world’s fastest quantum computer by computational advantage, and the world’s most sensitive neutrino detector. Just yesterday an attendee at this conference informed me of another I should add to my list: the world’s largest primate medical research center.

Now I can already hear some of your objections. “Tanner, these measures don’t include classified research. They don’t include the proprietary research by private companies—that is the stuff that actually pushes technology forward. American companies are not publishing billion-dollar trade secrets in the latest journals. The Chinese scientists are under insane publish or perish pressures—they are far more likely to lie and cheat. Don’t you know Chinese scientists take part in citation cartels? Haven’t you read those bitter critiques of the new system written by China’s own disgruntled scientists?”

My main response to this: you guys have lost the thread. I am reminded of a similar style of argument we often see in AI development. Every time a new model is released people play around with it for a bit and then start to catalog the flaws of this model. But the real story, the story historians will tell a generation from now, is never about the model of the moment. What matters is movement between those moments. History is made by the trend-line. What capabilities did the models have four years ago? What capabilities do they have now? What might they reasonably be expected to have in a decade hence?

Something similar might be said for science and China.

Link

In search of Banksy | Reuters

16-minute read

The British street artist’s identity has been debated, and closely guarded, for decades. A quest to solve the riddle took Reuters from a bombed-out Ukrainian village to London and downtown Manhattan — and uncovered much more than a name.

Link

Our radical plan to replace the NBA draft | Silver Bulletin

13-minute read

What if you could penalize tanking, decrease randomness, reduce perverse incentives, and give teams more control over their fate? There’s one big catch: you have to ditch the draft for an auction.

Don’t get me wrong: I’m excited about the NBA playoffs. But my interest in the NBA regular season has been flagging in a way that it hasn’t in a long time. There’s a simple reason: it’s the tanking. A full third of the league — five teams in each conference — basically gave up on the season at some point between October and February. The identities of the 10 playoff and play-in teams in each conference were practically locked in a few weeks ago — and they’re literally locked in now.

The NBA is acutely aware of the issue, though it’s unclear whether the league considers it a real problem or just a PR issue. (Here’s why it’s an actual problem: about half the games on any given night “feature” a tanking team. I’m not about to pay $200 a ticket to see a team that isn’t even trying to win play the Knicks at MSG.) And the solutions it has proposed are mostly tinkering around the edges with the current rules, full of the same kinks and quirks that will be exploited by future Sam Prestis and Daryl Moreys.

Link

2 stars

Did New Zealand’s Pink and White Terraces Survive? The Search for the Eighth Wonder of the World | Now Voyager

14-minute read

May 31, 1886, began like any other day for Sophia Hinerangi. She woke early at the steep-roofed whare where she lived, and gathered her touring party from their lodgings. From there she took them on a short walk from the village of Te Wairoa to the shore of New Zealand’s Lake Tarawera, where they would navigate on a pair of paddle-powered whaleboats.

For some of the travellers, this was the final leg of a voyage that had lasted months. They’d made long journeys on ocean liners and steamboats and stagecoaches from homes all over the world to one of the British Empire’s farthest-flung frontiers. These were, arguably, the world’s first ecotourists, and they were there to glimpse a geothermal marvel unlike any other, known widely as the eighth wonder of the world.

[...]

Sophia herself had noticed long-dormant geysers and hot springs sputter back to life. Later, she told the historian Ellen Massy that she’d feared something dreadful was about to happen.

It was in this febrile atmosphere that Sophia and her touring party reached Lake Tarawera’s shore one morning that May—only to discover it was dry, and that the whaleboats were stuck in mud. After a moment, she wrote, the water returned “with a crying, moaning sound.” The boats floated, then dropped as the water receded again. Then the water returned, its level higher than before. Everyone was scared, but they’d made it too far to turn back. After some discussion, the party pushed out across the water.

Link

My Mother’s Dying Wish Took Me on a Trip I’ll Never Forget | New York Times

2-minute read

On the ship I boarded at the bottom of Argentina with the three men I love most, I put my socks in a drawer, my sweaters on a shelf and my mother’s ashes in the cupboard above the minifridge. They were in a clear plastic bag inside a blue plastic box I’d ordered from Amazon, emblazoned with stickers that said “Cremated Remains” and “Fly Safe.”

[...]

One morning we awoke to a grayscale landscape: rock, ice, cloud. In the photo I took of Mom on our balcony, her hands are balled into fists, pressed to her heart, her smile tremulous. When we first stepped ashore, she said she wanted to kiss the briny pebbles under her boots. She wanted to do everything. She hiked in the snow; she kayaked. She fell in love with penguins, especially the saucy, knee-high gentoos with thick white markings above their eyes like Ernest Borgnine brows. I was chastened by the peninsula’s austere, extreme beauty. Here, like the Ross, was a place that would kill you without noticing, a place that made you feel tiny and vulnerable, its fearsome grandeur offering access to the sublime. When we sailed north, away, Mom embraced me in our cabin and cried. When she got home, she ordered a vanity license plate for her car that read: “GENTOO1.”

Original link | Archive.is link

Artemis II Is Not Safe to Fly | Idle Words

6-minute read

Is Orion’s heat shield really safe? New NASA chief conducts final review on eve of flight | Ars Technica

7-minute read

The trouble is that the heat shield on Orion blows chunks. Not in some figurative, pejorative sense, but in the sense that when NASA flew this exact mission in 2022, large pieces of material blew out of Orion’s heat shield during re-entry, leaving divots. Large bolts embedded in the heat shield also partially eroded and melted through.

NASA’s initial instinct was to cover up the problem. In early press releases, they stressed that both rocket and spacecraft had performed exceptionally, while declining to publish the post-flight assessment review. The first mention of heat shield damage came from Orion program manager Howard Hu on a call with reporters in March of 2023. Hu said: “we observed there were more variations across the heat shield than we expected; some of the expected char material that we would expect coming back home ablated away differently than what our computer models and what our ground testing predicted.”

[...]

In a nutshell, Camarda argues that NASA is demonstrating the same dysfunction that led to the Columbia and Challenger disasters. Faced with an unexpected engineering failure, it has built toy models to convince itself that the conclusion it wants to reach (it’s safe to fly) are supported by evidence. These toy models are not grounded in physics, but because they appear to be quantitative, they create a false sense of security and understanding, an epistemic fig leaf for management to hide behind.

Link

Isaacman made it clear at the outset that, after reviewing the data and discussing the matter with NASA engineers, he accepted the agency’s decision to fly Artemis II as planned. The team had his full confidence, and he hoped that by making the same experts available to Camarda and Olivas, it would ease some of their concerns.

What followed was a spirited discussion, with Camarda sparring regularly with the presenters and Olivas asking questions more infrequently. The engineering team in Houston, led by Luis Saucedo, went through dozens of charts and presented reams of data that had not been made public before.

“That level of openness and transparency is exactly what should be expected of NASA,” Isaacman said after the meeting.

Original link | Archive.is link

An Adrenaline Junkie Millionaire’s Quest to Become a Cocaine Kingpin | 404 Media

9-minute read

Immediately something was wrong. People on the ground saw the Venom’s wings rock back and forth shortly after its sluggish takeoff, a sign that it might be caught in the wake of the first plane. One video showed the Venom started to make a shallow left turn, and the plane’s engine sound decreased and then rapidly increased. Black smoke billowed. The plane stalled. As the aircraft barely reached 200 feet, it started to descend with its nose still pointed upwards.

[...]

The man in tears on the phone was Ylli Didani, a now convicted cocaine trafficker who orchestrated massive shipments of drugs into the UK and multiple European ports. Tibbitts, it turned out, had a secret life. Without the knowledge of his family, Tibbitts worked closely with Didani to become an aspiring international drug lord. The pair commissioned the construction of an elaborate underwater drone that would be stuffed with cocaine and latch onto ships with magnets. Tibbitts was the money and brains behind the operation, funding the submarine’s design and development. In messages with Didani, he referred to himself as Tony Stark, the alter ego of the millionaire inventor and superhero Ironman. According to investigators, Didani’s cocaine trafficking business was worth tens of millions of dollars. Didani had now lost his business partner and friend.

Original link | Archive.is link

Dark Shadows Fall, One Upon The Other | Rob Henderson’s Newsletter

13-minute read

An important lesson from history is that people living in relatively stable and functional societies seldom understand how rapidly things can deteriorate and plunge into catastrophe, violence, and mass murder.

A real-life individual named Savva Morozov (1862–1905) was one of the wealthiest men in pre-revolutionary Russia.

He was a textile magnate, a patron of the arts, and a genuine philanthropist. His Moscow mansion was said to be the most expensive in the city. He and his wife, Zinaida, hosted famous writers, composers, and scientists. Morozov also worked to improve conditions for workers in his factories. He gave pregnant women paid leave. He funded scholarships for students. He built a hospital and a theater for his workers. He pushed for constitutional reform: freedom of the press, freedom of association, workers’ rights to organize and strike, and public oversight of the state budget.

Morozov also bankrolled the Bolsheviks.

Reports from this period suggest he gave hundreds of thousands of rubles to the revolutionary cause. He personally financed an underground newspaper of the banned social-democratic party that would eventually become the Russian Communist Party.

Morozov’s goal was almost certainly not to ignite a civil war or hand power to a dictatorship. He likely saw the radicals as useful pressure on the tsar, a way to force real reforms from a regime that would not move on its own.

When revolution came in January 1905, the violence shocked him.

Link

Apple’s 50 Years of Integration | Stratechery

10-minute read

More generally, Apple’s market share in all of its markets, including the phone, continues to increase over time, not decrease. This is happening despite the fact that Apple is not investing at a meaningful level — at least compared to its Big Tech peers — in AI server capacity, and has yet to ship the new AI-empowered Siri it promised nearly two years ago. The reason it doesn’t matter is that no matter how powerful AI becomes, you still need to access it with a device, and Apple, thanks to its integration of hardware and software, makes the best devices.

Link

Transference in the Afternoon | Granta

22-minute read

A friend sent me the newspaper story. NYC hedge funder says shrink ‘seduced’ him into office sex sessions – and charged $250k in ‘mistress money’. The hedge funder, Michael Pollack, was suing his former therapist, Heidi Kling, for having sex with him nearly every week for ten years, all while accepting regular payments in cash.

Pollack did not claim that Kling had physically forced him to have sex. He had been an active participant in the sexual relationship for a decade. Only later, after they had stopped their meetings, did he come to view the experience as non-consensual, the destructive result of a force he called ‘erotic transference’. The lawsuit, filed in February 2023, claimed Kling’s actions left Pollack with severe emotional distress and panic attacks; landed a ‘debilitating’ blow to his self-confidence; and permanently damaged his relationship with his wife and sons.

Kling claimed that Pollack’s story was all wrong. She did not dispute the existence of a sexual relationship, but said she had terminated Pollack’s therapy before it began. In other words, even if she continued to meet Pollack in her office, what followed was not medical malpractice but an extramarital affair. Kling’s argument raised questions about Pollack’s motivations: if he had wished to break off the relationship without shouldering the blame, wouldn’t being a victim of mismanaged transference be the perfect alibi?

Original link | Archive.is link

Being John Rawls | Astral Codex Ten

14-minute read

“My theory of charity,” said John Rawls Visionary, “centers on nine words: there but for the grace of God go I. Society is a contract where we agree to help the less fortunate, knowing that if the shoe were on the other foot, they would help us in turn.”

“You have a rosy view of human nature,” said John Rawls Banker, in the same tone of voice he might use to say You have a bug on your face. A waiter came by, and brought each of them a glass of expensive wine.

“I don’t,” said John Rawls Visionary, “and that’s exactly what I bring to the table. My theory of charity is that we should only give to those poor people who, in the counterfactual where they were rich and we were poor, would give to us. I’ve been working on a pharmacological solution to the problem. This is what I’ve got.” He held up a vial of a colorless liquid. “Here. Take it as a souvenir. It’s one part sodium thiopental, one part LSD, and one part calea zacatechichi, the lucid dreaming herb of the Chantal Indians - plus a secret ingredient of my own devising. When a person drinks it, they enter a highly suggestible state. If a trained psychologist provides hypnotic keywords during their trip, they can sculpt an immersive dream where the patient lives an entire lifetime in a situation of the hypnotist’s choosing. The patient narrates their experience, letting us extract information. You can see the utility. When poor people ask us for money, we induce the trance and make them think we are poor, they are rich, and they’re being asked to donate to us. Then, we give money only to those beggars who would help us if the roles were reversed.”

“Astounding,” said John Rawls Banker.

“Can I pencil you in for a starting donation of $100,000?”

“I’m afraid not,” said John Rawls Banker. “I am certainly impressed with what you’ve accomplished, but it doesn’t change my fundamental position that the poor should work to better their own lives.”

Link

Claude Dispatch and the Power of Interfaces | One Useful Thing

4-minute read

AIs are already far more capable than most people realize. A large part of this so-called capability overhang comes not from the limits of AI (though, of course, they still have many limits), but from how people interact with it. The vast majority of people access AI through chatbots, and usually the free versions with less capable models. A chatbot is fine for a quick question, but it is a bad way to get real work done.

In fact, recent research suggests that we pay a mental tax when using chatbot interfaces for work.

Link

1 star

The fascinating insights of Robert Trivers | Optimally Irrational

9-minute read

Trivers was one of the most—perhaps the most—influential evolutionary biologists of the 20th century. His work should be much more widely known in social and behavioural sciences, in particular in economics, as Trivers’ intellectual approach is very much in line with a game theoretic understanding of social interactions.

It is hard to overstate the importance of his work.

[...]

Evolution is often conceived as implying that people should be selfish and cynical. This view is mistaken. As early as Darwin, evolutionary thinkers have suggested that cooperation was fully compatible with evolution. That being said, how cooperation evolved was, for a long time, an unresolved problem. One seemingly intuitive answer was proposed by Vero Wynne-Edwards: altruism is good for the group and hence altruism will be selected to help the group survive. Some old animal documentaries illustrated this idea, describing the old wildebeest allowing itself to be caught and eaten by the lion so that the younger ones in the herd could survive.

This idea, now labelled “group selection”, does not work. Selection operates at the individual level. If altruists sacrifice themselves for the group, the group might benefit, but the altruists in it will tend to disappear over time. So, self-sacrificial altruism is not something that we would expect to be selected.

[...]

Trivers’ insights align closely with those of game theory on the rationality of cooperation in repeated interactions. Indeed, Trivers was aware of the game-theoretic results and mentions them in his article.

Reciprocal altruism has become one of the main explanations of the emergence of cooperation between non-kin. Cooperation does not require society to be populated by saint-like figures; it works with humans as they are, warts and all. It is indeed the blend of cooperation and conflict in social interactions that explains the rich nature of our social emotions and the many mini intrigues layered into our social relations.

[...]

Trivers uses differential parental investment to explain a number of patterns observed across the animal kingdom: the greater tendency of males to desert their partners, the greater choosiness of females, who typically decide with whom to mate from a pool of pretenders, and the greater, sometimes violent, competition between males. More broadly, this framework also helps explain associated sex differences, such as higher male mortality and greater male body strength in species where success depends on winning intra-male competitions.

Link

Our possums are a problem. Could Selena Gomez be the solution? | The Spinoff

4-minute read

Last year, American pop star, actor and beauty mogul Selena Gomez launched a surprising new expansion of her empire: Oreos. The chocolate and cinnamon limited-edition creme cookies, described as “flavour-forward and horchata-inspired”, popped up in hypnotic displays in supermarkets across the country in July, complete with a giant rotating cookie that simply read “Oreo Selena Gomez”. The promotional material claimed the cookies were “great for movie night, and make wonderful birthday treats and music awards watch party snacks”.

What neither Selena Gomez nor Big Oreo could ever have anticipated is that these cookies, which feature music-themed designs including “Selena in the Studio” and “Play Your Heart Out”, would become a crucial weapon in the war against one of Aotearoa’s most infamous pests.

[...]

News of the Selena Gomez-based success soon started to spread across social media after the results of Hickling’s trial were published on Predator Free 2050’s website, and caught the attention of Ian McNeill from the Herald Island Environmental Group in Tāmaki Makaurau. The small urban island had been entirely possum free for over five years, but a handful had snuck back over from the mainland in December last year. “I could see them on the camera. In fact, I caught them mating on the camera at my home, giving me the right royal finger,” says McNeill.

Link

A Buddhist Sun Miracle? | Astral Codex Ten

4-minute read

In 1917, some Portuguese children started seeing visions of the Virgin Mary. The Virgin told them she would enact a great miracle on a certain day in October, and a crowd of 100,000 gathered to witness the event. According to eyewitness reports, newspaper articles, etc, they saw the sun spin around, change colors, and do various other miraculous things. At least a hundred separate testimonies of the event have come down to us, with only two or three people saying they didn’t see it. Catholics continue to bring this up as one of the best-attested miracles and strongest empirical proofs of the faith - including here on Substack, where there was a spirited debate about the event last fall.

[...]

The setting is the Dhammakaya Temple, a culty Buddhist megachurch in Bangkok.

On September 6 1998, a crowd of 20,000 gathered for a ceremony. Someone cried out that they saw a vision of the sect’s founder, Luang Pu Sodh, in the sky, with the sun at his heart. The crowd turned and focused on the sun.

[...]

This replication of Fatima in an “uncontaminated” context pushes me further towards believing that sun miracles are neither true divine intervention nor vague hypnotic suggestion, but some particular illusory/psychological phenomenon which necessarily manifests as the sun spinning and changing color, and which can occur independently even among people who aren’t primed to expect it.

Link

Retirees receive six times as much in federal dollars as young people | Washington Post

2-minute read

Considered per capita, the ratio between generations only grows. Retirees received the equivalent of about $43,700 per person — 10 times the amount that children and young adults received, at about $4,300 per person. Working-age adults received about $7,300 per capita, according to Penn Wharton’s analysis.

Original link | Archive.is link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Sucker: My Year as a Degenerate Sports Gambler | The Atlantic

33-minute read

On a Thursday evening in September, I excused myself from the family dinner table and slipped into my bedroom. I didn’t want my kids to see what I was about to do.

With the door locked behind me, I pulled out my phone and downloaded the DraftKings betting app. I felt a certain thrill as I typed in my debit-card information and deposited $500. The first game of the NFL season was a few minutes away. Anything seemed possible.

I am not, by temperament, a gambling man. As a suburban dad with four kids, a mortgage, and a minivan, I’m more likely to be found wrestling a toddler into a car seat than scouring moneylines or consulting betting touts. And as a practicing Mormon, I am prohibited from indulging in games of chance. Besides, I had always thought of gambling as a waste of time. This makes me an outlier among my generational peers: Since 2018, Americans have wagered more than half a trillion dollars on sports, and roughly half of men ages 18 to 49 have an active account with an online sportsbook.

When I set out to report on the sports-betting industry—its explosive growth, its sudden cultural ubiquity, and what it’s doing to America—my editors thought I should experience the phenomenon firsthand. Mindful of my religious constraints, they proposed a work-around: The Atlantic would stake me $10,000 to gamble with over the course of the upcoming NFL season. The magazine would cover any losses, and—to ensure my ongoing emotional investment—split any winnings with me, 50–50. Surely God would approve of such an arrangement, my editors reasoned, because I wouldn’t be risking my own hard-earned money.

Original link | Archive.is link

3 stars

The Shooting of Two Cornell Freshmen, 42 Years Later | Collegetown

13-minute read

In 1983 six students were taken hostage in a Cornell dormitory. Two of them were killed. How have the survivors reckoned with what happened to them, and what made us forget about this act of violence?

Link

Yearning for the Apocalypse | The Sword and the Sandwich

11-minute read

As chaos and violence break out across the Middle East in a war led by the US with Israel as junior partner, I wanted to revisit my research on Christian apocalyptic prophecy. This adapted excerpt from my book Wild Faith talks about the evangelical Christians eagerly looking forward to the end of the world—and influencing foreign policy to bring it closer. It’s difficult to conceive of willful courting of disaster for religious reasons, but decades of modern Christian prophecy eagerly foresee mass bloodshed in the Middle East as a prelude to Christ’s triumphant return. Evangelicals of this stripe form a crucial part of Trump’s base and governing coalition.

Link

We Haven’t Seen the Worst of What Gambling and Prediction Markets Will Do to America | Derek Thompson

7-minute read

A clever dystopian novelist might conceive of a future where poorly paid journalists for news wires are offered six-figure deals to report fictions that cash out bets from online prediction markets. But just how fanciful is that scenario when we have good reason to believe that journalists are already being pressured, bullied, and threatened to publish specific stories that align with multi-thousand dollar bets about the future?

Put it all together: rigged pitches, rigged war bets, and attempts to rig wartime journalism. Without context, each story would sound like a wacky conspiracy theory. But these are not conspiracy theories. These are things that have happened. These are conspiracies—full stop.

“If you’re not paranoid, you’re not paying attention” has historically been one of those bumperstickers you find on the back of a car with so many other bumperstickers that you worry for the sanity of its occupants. But in this weird new reality where every event on the planet has a price, and behind every price is a shadowy counterparty, the jittery gambler’s paranoia—is what I’m watching happening because somebody more powerful than me bet on it?—is starting to seem, eerily, like a kind of perverse common sense.

Link

What Happens When a Whale Is Born? | New Yorker

3-minute read

After a couple of hours, they happened upon eleven sperm whales, bunched closely together at the surface. This behavior was odd enough that the researchers dropped their plan to tag a whale. They launched a pair of camera-equipped drones to hover above the group. After another hour or so, a great cloud of blood swirled through the water. Then a new gray head appeared. Thanks to a crazily unlikely accident, the researchers had witnessed a sperm-whale birth and had managed to videotape the entire event.

Thanks to another crazy accident, I was onboard the catamaran that day. Not only did I get to witness the birth but also I got to watch the normally sober-minded researchers react to it. The scene on the deck resembled something out of the Marx Brothers. Everyone raced to the front of the boat to get a better view. “Oh, my God,” one of the scientists said, clutching his head. “Oh, my God, oh, my God.”

Original link | Archive.is link

2 stars

My dad made the biggest jewelled egg in the world. The obsession would destroy his marriage, family and fortune | The Guardian

12-minute read

BBC Television Centre, 2 May 1990. “Who would spend £7m on an egg?” The question echoes around the TV studio. At home, six million people watch as chatshow host Terry Wogan smiles knowingly, his brown eyes twinkling. “Seven million pounds,” he repeats in his Irish brogue.

“And you can’t even eat it.”

The audience laugh. A heckler shouts that he’d offer a fiver for it. The band strike up. At the back of the studio, two burly bodyguards stand silhouetted. The egg’s diamond-studded shell sparkles under the bright lights.

“It was no silly goose that laid this, the world’s biggest golden egg.” Wogan gestures towards the giant jewelled object, his voice infused with pantomime-style levels of excitement. “And let’s welcome the man who made it,” he says smoothly. “Paul Kutchinsky.”

My father saunters out, beaming from ear to ear. His shiny new loafers glide across the studio floor and he stretches his arm out towards Terry Wogan to steady himself. With his unruly mane, slender build and gold-rimmed glasses, he looks a bit like a mad professor.

Link

You Can Just Do Things | n+1

7-minute read

Why did Trump strike Iran, for the second time in less than a year, during a second go-round in the White House, after having already carried out a targeted assassination of an Iranian general in his first? Why do so after undoing Obama’s nuclear deal, repeatedly blowing up negotiations (figuratively), and cheering as the Israelis did so literally? Why attack Iran without any explicit stated objective? You can take your pick of answers, all of them gratingly obvious, none of them mutually exclusive.

[...]

We may think we’re playing a game that ends when we say it does, that the past only matters when we want it to, that the places we project our power will somehow always remain elsewhere, that the repressed will never return, and that repression takes no toll on all parties involved. At some point, and on some timeline you don’t get to choose, the world pushes back. You can just do things, sure, right until the game is up, and then you can’t.

Link

The Secret Police Playbook | Can We Still Govern?

7-minute read

Most people assume that repressive organizations are filled with true believers — ideological extremists who genuinely want to harm others, or at minimum sadists and sociopaths for whom the work is personally gratifying. The logic of this view is that the way to build a secret police force is to find the worst people and give them badges.

Our research tells a different story.

When we combed through the personnel archives of Argentina’s Intelligence Battalion 601 — the secret police unit that orchestrated the disappearance, torture, and killing of thousands during the country’s so-called Dirty War — we were not looking for monsters. We were looking for patterns. And the pattern we found was strikingly mundane: the officers who joined Battalion 601 had, in the main, performed worse than their peers at the military academy. They had graduated toward the bottom of their cohorts. They had stalled in the lower and middle ranks. They were men whose regular career paths had quietly closed.

These were not the most extreme officers in Argentina’s army. They were the most stuck.

And herein lies the key insight. The Argentine army maintained a rigorous, century-old meritocratic promotion system — Prussian in design, consistent across political regimes, based on performance at each career stage. This system did exactly what meritocratic systems are supposed to do: it identified and advanced the most capable officers. But it did something else too, something less discussed. It reliably produced a large pool of men who did not make the cut — men who underperformed early, fell behind their cohorts, and faced the prospect of forced early retirement under the army’s unforgiving up-or-out rule.

Link

California’s Deadliest Avalanche Turned on One Choice | The Atlantic

8-minute read

Why did a group of 15 skiers take a risky route on a dangerous day?

Original link | Archive.is link

My road trip with the do-gooding cactus smugglers | Economist

13-minute read

There are plants and then there are plants that make you sink to your knees and weep. Ran Fowler was on the hunt for the second kind—specifically a fine example of a rare succulent called Agave shawii. Fowler had first encountered the specimen in 2023 on a plant-hunting expedition to the Mexican desert. He was blown away by the beauty of its spines. Normally they are evenly spaced along the edge of the leaf, but on this plant they had fused, creating a ragged fringe that looked as if it had been dyed purple and pink.

Fowler, who owns a succulent nursery in southern California, knew it was risky to take a cutting from the agave.

Original link | Archive.is link

Culture Shift | Asimov Press

9-minute read

We tend to think of fermented foods as something humans invented and then chose to eat. But the evidence shows the opposite: fermented foods shaped human biology.

Link

What 100 Million Volts Do to the Body and Mind | The Atlantic [gift article]

10-minute read

The odds of being struck by lightning in America in a given year are one in 1.2 million. How does the experience reorient a person’s sense of chance, of fate?

Original link | Archive.is link

My journey from foreign correspondent to Uber driver in Trump’s America | Navigating the Drift

7-minute read

The people I am driving around are, like me, trying to navigate that drift. They are widows, teachers, hospital workers, mechanics. They are people who get up before dawn to feed their families. They trust me to get them to work on time. I trust an app to buy me another day. None of us has any real leverage. Like the migrants who survived the deadliest border crossing on the planet, we are all at the mercy of the sea.

Link

Darwin’s Barnacles | Science History Institute

5-minute read

If asked to pick an animal that influenced Charles Darwin, most of us would select the same one: the iconic Galápagos finches with their precisely crafted beaks, each tuned to a different ecological niche.

But the truth is, Darwin didn’t really care about finches. He collected some during his famous voyage on the Beagle but proceeded to make a complete hash of them. He actually misidentified the birds, calling them grosbeaks, and had to be corrected by an expert back in England. Worse, he forgot to record the island of origin for most of the finches, making them useless for evolutionary study. Darwin didn’t even specifically mention Galápagos finches in his monumental On the Origin of Species.

So while pop culture usually associates evolution with the Galápagos, Darwin left the islands in the same state he’d arrived—a creationist. What animals shaped his theory of evolution, then? Pigeons played a part, as did worms. But the biggest influence on Darwin was a lowly, much-despised marine pest—the barnacle.

Link

The Weather-Changing Conspiracy Theory That Will Never End | The Atlantic

7-minute read

Throughout the long, true history of secretive military science, the government really did favor sparsely populated areas (and specifically Alaska) to avoid prying eyes, which has had the ironic knock-on effect of making any distant outpost seem like it’s up to something nefarious, even when nothing very interesting is going on. If HAARP were located just outside of Cleveland, maybe nobody would care about it.

Living with a conspiracy theory means thinking about this kind of thing all the time. Should the university share really cool photos of the array with aurora visible above it, or is that inviting a rash of Facebook misinformation? Should it sell merchandise featuring cartoon aliens, or is that making too much fun of people’s concerns? After dark, Matthews and I drove around the facility grounds, and she stopped in front of the array to point to the red lights at the base of each of the poles, which indicate that the transmitters are operational. They gave the entire scene an ominous glow.

“Would you post a photo of that on social media?” she asked. I considered it. It looked like something that could freak a lot of people out, I told her. It was kind of freaking me out just sitting there. No, I thought. I probably wouldn’t.

Original link | Archive.is link

The Dreams of a Bumblebee in Autumn | Nautilus

4-minute read

For insects do in fact sleep, and the sleep of bumblebees also resembles our own, alternating between a deep slumber and a shallower, more mentally active state that seems akin to REM sleep, with our rapid eye movements replaced by a twitching of antennae. Which poses the question: Do those sleeping bees dream?

Link

The Zombie Regulator | New Yorker

16-minute read

As the cost of living continues to spiral upward, the Trump Administration is gutting the government agency built to protect Americans from financial ruin.

Original link | Archive.is link

Language Birth | Asterisk

12-minute read

In October 1992, a Circassian man by the name of Tevfik Esenç passed away at the age of 88. Esenç had been, as his gravestone attested, “the last person able to speak the language they called Ubykh.” An extreme example of the remarkable languages of the Caucasus mountains, Ubykh was articulated with all of 80 different consonants, compared to English’s 24. Regarding Ubykh, linguist John Colarusso noted that “any rigorous account of human phonetic perceptual capacity will have to take into account this precious marvel.” We know something particular about the human mind in large part thanks to Ubykh. And we know about Ubykh in large part thanks to Tevfik Esenç.

[...]

Yet Ubykh is merely one of hundreds of languages that have withered and expired in recent decades. About 3000 of the world’s 7000 or so languages are endangered. A highly disproportionate fraction of now-extinct languages have gone silent just since 1960, and most were not blessed with a Tevfik. Major global languages like English, Spanish, Mandarin and Hindi continue to accrue speakers, while smaller ones shrivel.

Link

The Chronicler of Decline | Hedgehog Review

5-minute read

Reading Gibbon, a work of imaginative literature as much as empirical historiography, we certainly see distressing parallels. “The principles of a free constitution are irrevocably lost,” writes Gibbon, “when the legislative power is nominated by the executive”—a caution that our Congress should more carefully heed. “But the wisdom and authority of the legislator are seldom victorious in a contest with the vigilant dexterity of private interest”—a tendency which the Supreme Court majority might have considered more carefully before it made its Citizens United decision. “Whole generations may be swept away by the madness of kings in the space of a single hour”—a truth that might have become the motto of DOGE. “The Roman government appeared every day less formidable to its enemies, more odious and oppressive to its subjects”—as pithy an encapsulation of the current situation as can be imagined.

Link

The Elusive Cost Savings of the Prefabricated Home | Construction Physics

18-minute read

It’s long been believed the constantly rising costs of new home construction, and lackluster improvements in construction productivity more generally, are fundamentally a problem of production methods. Most houses in the US are still built on-site, using manual labor and hand tools, a manner of construction that doesn’t seem all that different from construction in the 19th century. By contrast, sectors like agriculture and manufacturing have shifted from this type of “craft production,” where work is done primarily by skilled manual labor, to industrialized, factory production, where work is mainly done by high-volume, highly automated machinery. Direct labor — the labor needed to actually physically produce something — makes up only about 10-12% of the cost to manufacture a modern car, while it’s roughly half of the cost of building a new single family home. Extending this line of thinking suggests that if construction could be similarly industrialized — if homes were built in factories and then delivered to their sites, rather than built on-site, by hand — we’d see the sorts of falling costs and rising productivity in construction that we’ve seen in manufacturing and agriculture.

Link

Shaun Maguire: “xAI will win” | X

5-minute read

I’m told that this Sequoia partner is not to be trusted, but he makes an interesting argument nonetheless:

People are sleeping on Elon... again. And especially on xAI.

[...]

The narrative engineers want you to see distraction and decline. But what’s actually happening is a convergence of multiple decades long roadmaps into an acceleration unlike anything we’ve ever seen.

Space, chips, energy and AI are all coming together. Elon is a leader in all of these fields.

Link

Stay Classy: Mummy’s Favourite | London Review of Books

10-minute read

Mummy loved Andrew, and what Mummy loved, Mummy protected. By 1984, it seemed he’d got the basic point about dropping the floozies and finding the sort of woman who would ‘understand him’. Enter ‘Chatterbox One’, the codename given to Sarah Ferguson by air traffic controllers when she was learning to fly, a woman in happy possession of two O-levels who exuded jolliness and scads of suitability. (Her father was Prince Charles’s polo manager and it was Diana who set her up with the fourth-in-line.) After a few country weekends and acres of japes, Ferguson was installed as the Duchess of York.

Link

Building Brasília | JSTOR Daily

5-minute read

Think of a country. Now consider its capital. Why was this particular city chosen as such? Because it’s the most populous, as in Seoul? Because it represents the country’s economic center, like Tokyo? Because, like Rome, it’s full of history? Or because it resulted from a political agreement, as in Washington, DC?

When we consider Brasília, the capital city of Brazil, we see a place that meets none of the above conditions and seems to make no sense. Brasília was built from scratch, in the middle of nowhere, in the hostile climate of the Cerrado—a savanna-like biome—hundreds of miles from any highway, railway, or airport. That the new capital was inaugurated in 1960, just four years after its construction began, makes it all the more impressive. Why would a country set out to build a capital city from scratch when one—Rio de Janeiro—already existed? Photographs and visual records preserved in Rice University’s Brasília Iconography collection and shared via JSTOR capture this ambitious undertaking as it unfolded.

Link

When Do We Become Adults, Really? | New Yorker

6-minute read

As humans, we want our lives to be like building blocks that make sense when put together, Jeffrey Jensen Arnett, a research scholar at Clark University, told me. In 2000, Arnett coined a new life stage—emerging adulthood—to reflect life-style changes he had observed in people between eighteen and twenty-nine. He told me that another stage was proposed even more recently, in 2020: established adulthood. It is said to fall between thirty and forty-five, so I was smack in the middle of it. I wondered whether this stage would suit me better—and whether I needed one at all. Does it matter how we carve up a life?

Original link | Archive.is link

1 star

How Big Diaper absorbs billions of extra dollars from American parents | The Hustle

6-minute read

US parents toilet train their kids much later than they used to. And that trend is a sales bonanza for Pampers and Huggies.

Link

Competitive Scrabble Is A Lexical Shitshow | Defector

13-minute read

But I’d never seen anything like what happened during Round 9 of the high-school division at the 2025 tournament. It had nothing to do with the ability of the players—the top two seeds, classmates and pals, regulars on the tournament Scrabble circuit, and great kids, too. Instead, it reflected some uncomfortable realities about humans and words: the dysfunction that defines the small community of competitive Scrabble players in North America, to which I’ve devoted a big chunk of my life for more than a quarter-century, and the debate, rancor, misunderstanding, and confusion around what constitutes a word, and who, ultimately, gets to decide.

Link

How Natural Are Tradeoff And Failure Components? | Astral Codex Ten

2-minute read

All multifactorial problems should naturally be combinations of tradeoffs and failures.

Consider something human-level and common-sensical like poverty. People may be poor because of “failures” - negative qualities with no counterbalancing advantages. For example, they may be unintelligent, or chronically ill, or stuck in poor areas with bad education systems. These are cases where something goes wrong - their body, their health care system, their schools.

Other people are poor because of tradeoffs. The starving artist who spends all their time pursuing a creative vision instead of working a 9-5 job. The bohemian who prefers a relaxing lifestyle to the corporate grind. These people start with average capacity for success, but choose to spend their optionality in ways that give them less money and more of other things.

We can trivially extend this to most other negative situations. Single people might be ugly and awkward, or they might have chosen to trade off the good of a relationship for the goods of freedom and casual sex. A bad pizza might be bad because the chef was incompetent, or because it’s traded off taste for some other value like cheapness, convenience, or dietary restrictions (eg vegan, gluten-free).

Link

What I Found When I Tried to Walk Across Dallas in a Day | Texas Monthly

5-minute read

Determined to find adventure in my own backyard, I tramped across my famously pedestrian-averse hometown. The most memorable part turned out to be the serendipitous encounters with neighbors I met along the way.

[...]

All told, I walked 52.44 miles over 35 hours and 50 minutes and met 231 people.

Original link | Archive.is link

Musketeer d’Artagnan’s remains believed found under Dutch church | BBC News

2-minute read

More than 350 years after the death of legendary French musketeer d’Artagnan, his remains may well have been found under the floor of a Dutch church.

Link

Always Keep Your Eye on Production | Bet On It

1-minute read

When I encounter stories like this, I reply with an adage I urge my fellow economists to adopt: “Always keep your eye on production.” Whenever analyzing an economic problem, you should, by default, ignore longs chains of social causation and ignore distribution. Instead, remember that mass production is the root cause of mass consumption. Then ask yourself, “How will whatever we’re talking about change the total amount of stuff produced?”

Link

Physician Incomes and the Extreme Shortage of High IQ Worker | Marginal Revolution

1-minute read

Physician incomes are extraordinarily high in the United States. A new NBER paper finds that U.S. physicians earn roughly two to four times as much as their counterparts in Canada, the Netherlands, and Sweden.

Why? Is it some feature particular to the US health care sector? Probably not. The same paper finds that physicians in the US have about the same relative income ranking as in Canada, the Netherlands, and Sweden. In other words, lots of high-skill workers in the US earn high incomes and physicians don’t look unusual relative to these other high-skill groups.

That is exactly what one would expect in an economy with an extreme shortage of high-IQ, high-skill workers.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

The Man Who Broke Into Jail | New Yorker

34-minute read

Lieutenant Thomas Conrad was standing in a control room in Nashville’s new central jail when he noticed something off with one of the key rings hanging on the wall. It was midday on December 30, 2019, and in two weeks the still empty jail would take in about seven hundred inmates. While contractors were finishing their work, Conrad, a senior correctional officer with the Davidson County Sheriff’s Office, was organizing equipment: handheld radios, handcuffs, and keys. Conrad had been an infantryman in Iraq, where he’d learned to spot slight inconsistencies in the landscape. Looking more closely at the key ring, he realized what was wrong: it was circular. All the others were horseshoe-shaped.

The key rings were fastened with hard plastic locks. The lock on the circular ring, Conrad saw, was cracked. On each key ring was a disk stamped with the number of keys that should be in the set. The disk on the circular ring was stamped “18.” Conrad counted the keys three times: there were only sixteen. He phoned Lieutenant Timothy Dial, the jail’s key-control officer, and said, “I’m going to need you to come down here.”

Dial arrived. “We don’t use rings like this,” he told Conrad.

“It’s got to be maintenance,” Conrad said. Speculating that a cleaner had somehow broken the original key ring, he radioed the maintenance crew.

The plastic lock on the mysterious key set was yellow, signifying “restricted,” because it held a general-movement key that could open almost any door in the jail. Dial consulted a key-inventory spreadsheet; the general-movement key was one of the two that were missing.

[...]

When news of the arrest got out, people who knew Friedmann were similarly shocked. So were those who only knew of him. Friedmann was one of the most respected prison-reform activists in America. He was the associate director of the Human Rights Defense Center, a prisoners’-rights organization, and the president of the Private Corrections Institute, a watchdog group that monitors the for-profit-prison industry. He was the managing editor of Prison Legal News, a newspaper written by and for inmates. He often addressed the Tennessee legislature and had testified before Congress. He’d spoken at A.C.L.U. and N.A.A.C.P. conferences, lectured at law schools, and consulted on prison legislation for Bernie Sanders.

Friedmann was the sort of activist that people who normally can’t abide activists could appreciate. He seemed more like a professor, maintaining a neat white goatee, and wearing button-down shirts, ties, and rimless glasses. Allies and critics alike described him as brilliant and single-mindedly devoted to his cause, yet also as so rational and eloquent that he won over law-and-order conservatives and recalcitrant public officials. He could be vain, but he was better known for his gentleness.

Original link | Archive.is link

Tom Junod Finally Reckons with What It Means to Be a Man | Esquire

15-minute read

In a long list of classic stories, the legendary magazine writer helped teach readers what masculinity looks like in the 21st century. To write his first book, he had to confront the man who first taught him: his father.

Original link | Archive.is link

One Man’s Quest for the End of the World Started on a Ranch in Texas | Texas Monthly

17-minute read

It was nearly Christmas, and Jerome Urbanosky was expecting unusual company. The easygoing 72-year-old rancher stood outside his redbrick home, watching as a dozen or so vehicles crunched along the gravel road that winds through the grassy plain of his 1,500-acre ranch northwest of Houston. The delegation that piled out into his driveway included high-ranking rabbis who’d flown straight from Israel, a U.S. documentary crew toting multiple cameras, and a Texas businessman named Byron Stinson.

Urbanosky was taken aback by the size of the crew—but that wasn’t the thing that startled him the most. Four men dressed in black tactical gear and carrying military rifles approached and told him they needed to sweep the property to make sure no “foreign agents” were present. “They were armed to the teeth,” Urbanosky remembered. He wasn’t inclined to stand in their way. His wife, Jane, who was in the kitchen preparing the weekly Sunday meal, stared saucer-eyed as the armed men entered her home.

Once the security team cleared the property, Urbanosky led the rabbis to a red barn, where two calves awaited. Urbanosky Ranch is home to a herd of more than 450 Santa Gertrudis cattle, a hardy breed that’s known to produce good beef and whose origins trace back to the King Ranch, in South Texas. But as Urbanosky knew, this delegation wasn’t here for a steak.

Santa Gertrudis cattle also have striking coats of deep rusty red, which is what had initially attracted Stinson’s attention. A seventy-year-old Glen Rose business owner who’s described himself as a “Jesus zealot,” Stinson had visited Urbanosky at his ranch once before and explained that he was in search of an unblemished, completely red heifer—a scratch or a single white hair, and it wouldn’t do. Such a heifer hadn’t been identified in two thousand years, but it was key to unlocking an ancient Jewish ritual described in the book of Numbers, a necessary precursor to constructing the Third Temple in Jerusalem and, ultimately, bringing about the Second Coming of Christ. It’s a fringe but nonetheless influential belief, and Stinson’s Israeli associate, Yitshak Mamo, had convinced Urbanosky that he, too, was essential to this journey.

Original link | Archive.is link

2 stars

A Hockey Dad, a Cartel, and a $12 Million Fraud | Rolling Stone

20-minute read

Noble had spent almost 16 years as an FBI agent, working mainly on violent crime and narcotics, and Wilkinson had spent most of her 10-year career in analytical and managerial roles across the U.S. Both had only recently started working in white-collar crime, and neither had seen a con like it. Youngblood’s was no ordinary online phishing or Nigerian-prince baiting scheme. It was a confidence game built on proximity — on family dinners, on the slow, yearslong conversion of friendship into obedience. Youngblood studied his victims’ personalities like a psychologist analyzing a patient, identifying the anxious father, the loyal friend, the keen investor. And he capitalized on their fears of an unknown other, something that existed outside of their aspirational lives, often the cartel just over the border.

The agents discovered Youngblood created two worlds. In the first, he was an avuncular presence at the Chaparral Ice rink in north Austin. He introduced himself as just another hockey dad, with two sons and a doctor as a wife. Still, there was a significant whiff of intrigue. People from that world tell me Youngblood spoke in a low, confidential murmur, flashed military tattoos, and dropped hints about tours in Afghanistan and secret government work. But he was also an alpha-male dad who mostly kept to himself and always thanked the coaches for working with his son. To Eric Perardi, a successful businessman and part-time coach of the hockey team, who would later become one of the primary victims, Youngblood was fascinating. He seemed to fill the humdrum of the parents’ middle-class suburban lives with just enough mystery to be exciting, but never enough to be unbelievable or un­comfortable.

Original link | Archive.is link

The case of the disappearing secretary | Rowland’s newsletter

10-minute read

Not so long ago, the work of secretaries – typing, filing, organising, administrating – was a cornerstone of the economy. By 1984, six years after the map above, there were around 18 million clerical and secretarial workers in the United States, roughly 18 percent of the entire workforce. This was totally normal. In the UK at the same time, between 17 and 18 percent of the workforce was some kind of secretary. In France it was 16 percent. Different economies with different economic policies; all ended up with one in five or six workers employed in clerical work.

Why so many? Because every stage of information processing required a human hand. In a mid-century organisation, a manager did not “write” a memo. He dictated it. A secretary took it down in shorthand, then retyped it. Then made copies. Then collated the copies by hand. Then distributed them. Then filed them. And so on and so on. Nothing moved unless someone physically moved it. There was no other way.

[...]

Now, the interface with the machinery of work is changing once again: from the computer to AI. This isn’t meant as a grandiose statement about the all-encompassing power of AI. I mean, simply, that if you want to get things done, it’s increasingly obvious that the best way is going to be through some kind of conversation with a machine, especially when the machine can then go and complete the task itself. Think of an admin-enabling app, whether it’s Outlook, Teams or Expedia. It’s hard to see a future where they’re not either replaced or mediated by AI.

[...]

So, in summary: computerisation ended some jobs, changed lots of others and created many ones. Yet that description covers so little of what really happened, because the biggest change wasn’t to the jobs, it was to the people and how they behaved. This is what I really learned writing this piece. I went in expecting to find out about tasks and technologies and I came out having learnt about a strange world very different from my own, a world now almost entirely vanished.

Link

Agents Over Bubbles | Stratechery

11-minute read

There is a weird paradox in terms of AI prognostication: on one hand, you don’t want to be the one to completely dismiss the most terrifying doomsday scenarios; who wants to be found out to be foolishly optimistic? At the same time, there is also pressure to give credence to the possibility that we are in a bubble, and all of this hype and spending is going to go belly up.

While I have argued against the former, I have very much been on board with the latter, making the case that bubbles can be good.

Sitting here in March 2026, however, on the morning of Nvidia’s GTC, I’ve come to a different conclusion: I don’t think we’re in a bubble (which, paradoxically, maybe is the truest evidence we are).

Link

The Strait of Hormuz: It Must Be Open for All or Closed to All | Home & Away

4-minute read

From Richard Haass, previously the President of the Council on Foreign Relations:

This special edition of Home & Away is devoted to one issue: the need to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. It includes a new proposal – one described here as “Open for All or Closed to All” – that I believe holds the best chance of resolving this issue satisfactorily.

Link

The US-Israeli strategy against Iran is working. Here is why | Al Jazeera

6-minute read

I don’t think this is right, but it’s about as good an argument for this view that I’ve seen:

Two weeks into Operation Epic Fury, the dominant narrative has settled into a comfortable groove: The United States and Israel stumbled into a war without a plan. Iran is retaliating across the region. Oil prices are surging, and the world is facing another Middle Eastern quagmire. US senators have called it a blunder. Cable news has tallied the crises. Commentators have warned of a long war.

The chorus is loud and, in some respects, understandable. War is ugly, and this one has imposed real costs on millions of people across the Middle East, including the city I live in.

But this narrative is wrong. Not because the costs are imaginary, but because the critics are measuring the wrong things. They are cataloguing the price of the campaign while ignoring the strategic ledger.

[...]

Iran now faces a strategic dilemma that tightens every day. If it fires its remaining missiles, it exposes launchers that are promptly destroyed. If it conserves them, it forfeits the ability to impose costs of the war. Missile and drone launch data suggest Iran is rationing its remaining capacity for politically timed salvoes rather than sustaining operational tempo.

This is a force managing decline, not projecting strength.

[...]

None of this minimises the human costs. More than 1,400 civilians have been killed in Iran, a moral burden the US and Israel will carry. Oil price spikes are hurting every economy on Earth. At least 11 US service members have been killed. I live with these sirens every day, as does everyone across the Gulf. The costs are real, they are serious, and any accounting that ignores them is dishonest.

But the critics are making a different error: They are treating the costs of action as if the costs of inaction were zero. They were not. They were measured in the slow accretion of a threat that, left unchecked, would have produced exactly the crisis everyone claims to fear: a nuclear-armed Iran capable of closing the Strait of Hormuz at will, surrounded by proxy forces that could hold the entire region hostage indefinitely.

Link

1 star

Shameless Guesses, Not Hallucinations | Astral Codex Ten

3-minute read

I hate the term “hallucinations” for when AIs say false things. It’s perfectly calculated to mislead the reader - to make them think AIs are crazy, or maybe just have incomprehensible failure modes.

AIs say false things for the same reason you do.

At least, I did. In school, I would take multiple choice tests. When I didn’t know the answer to a question, I would guess. Schoolchild urban legend said that “C” was the best bet, so I would fill in bubble C. It was fine. Probably got a couple extra points that way, maybe raised my GPA by 0.1 over the counterfactual.

[...]

AIs have no shame. Their entire training process is based on guessing (the polite term is “prediction”). It goes like this:

1. AIs start with random weights, ie total chaos.

2. They’re asked to predict the next token in a text.

3. They give a random answer.

4. When they get it wrong, the training process slightly updates their weights towards the pattern that would have gotten it right.

5. After trillions of tokens, their weights are in a good, nonrandom pattern that often predicts the next token successfully.

But even after step 5, they’re still guessing. Consider the following sentence: “I went out with my friend Mr. _______ “. With your human knowledge, you can predict that the token in the blank will be a surname. But you have no way to know which. If your life was on the line, you might guess “Smith”, since it’s the most common surname. Even the smartest AI can do little better.

[...]

Understood correctly, this is a story about alignment. AIs are smart enough to understand the game they’re actually playing - the game of determining strategies that get reward during pretraining. We just haven’t figured out how to align their reward function (get a high score on the pretraining algorithm) with our own desires (provide useful advice). People will say with a straight face “I don’t worry about alignment because I’ve never seen any alignment failures . . . and also, all those crazy hallucinations prove AIs are too dumb to be dangerous.”

Link

25 years of iPod brain | Dirt

4-minute read

I spent the summer of 2004 working at a food establishment that sold “subs, wings ‘n’ things.” My employment was a little dubious; I was 14, which I think was fair game in the state of Vermont, but I got paid in cash and wasn’t allowed to use the deep fryer. My coworker was a woman with a son named Moose; she enjoyed giving me advice for my upcoming high school experience (“Go to class”). My boss was fond of sending customers off with full-sized bottles of ketchup in their to-go bags. I spent a lot of time pressing raw potatoes through a metal french fry cutter into a big plastic bucket. At summer’s end, I brought a stack of cash to Best Buy and bought a fourth-generation iPod. Now my life could truly begin.

It’s hard to believe that there was once a time when consumer technology solved problems we actually had.

Link

A Danish Fix for U.S. Mortgage Lock-in | Marginal Revolution

2-minute read

In other words, there actually is a free or at least a low-priced lunch because lock-in is bad for homeowners and it doesn’t benefit lenders. As a result, moving to a Danish system would create net benefits.

Link

How the Turner Twins Are Mythbusting Modern Gear | Carryology

4-minute read

Ross and Hugo Turner are genetically identical professional adventurers. By dressing one in cutting-edge technical apparel and the other in 100-year-old heritage kit on the world’s toughest expeditions, they are conducting the ultimate A/B test on modern gear.

Link

Why Fallacies Don’t Exist | Maarten Boudry’s Substack

9-minute read

Have you ever wondered why people believe the moon landing was faked, vaccines secretly poison us, and Mercury in retrograde can ruin your love life? Why does irrationality seem so pervasive? A popular answer, beloved by academics and educators alike, points to fallacies—certain types of arguments that are deeply flawed yet oddly seductive. Because people keep falling for these reasoning traps, they end up believing all sorts of crazy stuff. Still, the theory offers hope: if you memorize the classics—ad hominem, post hoc, straw man—you will inoculate yourself against them.

It’s a neat little story, and I used to believe it too. Not anymore. I’ve become a fallacy apostate.

Link

Who is a victim? | Marginal Revolution

1-minute read

In general, liberals see vulnerability as group-based, dividing the moral world into groups of vulnerable victims and invulnerable oppressors. Conservatives downplay group-based differences, seeing vulnerability as more individual and evenly distributed.

Link

Claims about grade inflation | Marginal Revolution

1-minute read

Being assigned a higher average grade inflating teacher reduces a student’s future test scores, the likelihood of graduating from high school, college enrollment, and ultimately earnings. In contrast, passing grade inflation reduces the likelihood of being held back and increases high school graduation, with limited long-run effects. The cumulative impact is economically significant: a teacher with one standard deviation higher average grade inflation reduces the present discounted value of lifetime earnings of their students by $213,872 per year.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Notes from a Burmese Prison | A comic by Danny Fenster & Amy Kurzweil | The Verge

11-minute read

If you want to get a letter out of a Burmese prison, do not give it to the guards.

Perhaps this is obvious, but when they told me I could write two a month — one to my embassy and one to Juliana — I was naive enough to try.

“All night,” I wrote to Juliana.

“A fluorescent flood light illuminates the clouds of mosquitoes feasting on me, which makes it hard to sleep, and when the mosquitoes retreat, the ants crawl in — in pulsing veins along the cell wall and floor, over every inch of skin all day.”

I filled every centimeter of the official letter form they gave me.

“But it’s all fine. I’ve already gotten used to it by now. I just want to see you.”

Three days later…

“Write bigger. And don’t say there are ants here.”

So I tried again.

“Ju- I love and miss you so much. I am doing well physically and feeling more or less healthy — but mentally things are obviously rough…”

“No.”

And again.

“Sorry.”

[...]

Juliana’s package was my first indication that anyone knew where I was. It had taken several days to pass inspection. I’d heard there were books too, but the prison translator had to first certify that they contained no political content. Journal entry: “Just reflecting on how brilliant my wife is. She near telepathically included just about every essential item I’d been wanting. And she included a (new?) air-tight tupperware container, to keep the bugs out. Most of this she must have intuited. I also imagine her asking coworkers etc.

Link

3 stars

Why Europe doesn’t have a Tesla | Works in Progress

12-minute read

In recent decades, Europe has fallen behind the United States. In 2000, incomes in the original six members of the European Union were just 10 percent behind Americans. Today, they are 20 percent lower. One factor behind this has been the lack of innovation in European business. To a striking extent, Europe lacks tech giants like Google, Meta and Amazon. But even in industries in which it has traditionally excelled, like carmaking, Europe has failed to keep up. Tesla is now worth more than the next nine largest carmakers in the world put together. Six American cities are now served by robotaxis made by Waymo. Understanding why Europe doesn’t have Google is important. Understanding why it doesn’t have a Tesla is existential.

[...]

What really sets Europe apart from states like California is different. Relative to income, it costs large companies four times more to lay off Germans and French than American workers, a difference arising entirely from different regulatory approaches. As a result, it virtually never happens: Americans are ten times more likely to be fired than Germans in any given year. In this respect, the European economy differs greatly from the American one. By American standards, a European business has to be exceptionally confident that it will want an employee for a long time before hiring them.

This may sound like a great virtue of European life, and in a way it is. But it has costs. If it is expensive to fire people, then companies may pay them less in order to balance out employment costs, or they may not employ people at all. To understand the innovation gap, however, there is a third effect that is even more important. If it is expensive to lay people off, employers avoid creating jobs that they might subsequently discontinue. Innovation involves experimentation and risk, so jobs in innovative areas of the economy are more likely to be discontinued than jobs elsewhere. High severance costs create a fundamental incentive for European businesses to avoid innovative areas and concentrate on safe, unchanging ones. In the long run, this is a recipe for decline.

Link

Child’s Play | Harper’s Magazine

24-minute read

The first sign that something in San Francisco had gone very badly wrong was the signs. In New York, all the advertising on the streets and on the subway assumes that you, the person reading, are an ambiently depressed twenty-eight-year-old office worker whose main interests are listening to podcasts, ordering delivery, and voting for the Democrats. I thought I found that annoying, but in San Francisco they don’t bother advertising normal things at all. The city is temperate and brightly colored, with plenty of pleasant trees, but on every corner it speaks to you in an aggressively alien nonsense. Here the world automatically assumes that instead of wanting food or drinks or a new phone or car, what you want is some kind of arcane B2B service for your startup. You are not a passive consumer. You are making something.

This assumption is remarkably out of step with the people who actually inhabit the city’s public space. At a bus stop, I saw a poster that read: today, soc 2 is done before your ai girlfriend breaks up with you. it’s done in delve. Beneath it, a man squatted on the pavement, staring at nothing in particular, a glass pipe drooping from his fingers. I don’t know if he needed SOC 2 done any more than I did. A few blocks away, I saw a billboard that read: no one cares about your product. make them. unify: transform growth into a science. A man paced in front of the advertisement, chanting to himself. “This . . . is . . . necessary! This . . . is . . . necessary!” On each “necessary” he swung his arms up in exaltation. He was, I noticed, holding an alarmingly large baby-pink pocketknife. Passersby in sight of the billboard that read wearable tech shareable insights did not seem piqued by the prospect of having their metrics constantly analyzed. I couldn’t find anyone who wanted to prompt it. then push it. After spending slightly too long in the city, I found that the various forms of nonsense all started to bleed into one another. The motionless people drooling on the sidewalk, the Waymos whooshing around with no one inside. A kind of pervasive mindlessness. Had I seen a billboard or a madman preaching about “a CRM so smart, it updates itself”? Was it a person in rags muttering about how all his movements were being controlled by shadowy powers working out of a data center somewhere, or was it a car?

Original link | Archive.is link

My journey to the microwave alternate timeline | Telescopic Turnip

8-minute read

Inventors constantly come up with exciting new inventions, each of them with the potential to change everything forever. But only a fraction of these ever establish themselves as a persistent part of civilization, and the rest vanish from collective consciousness. Before shutting down forever, though, the alternate branches of the tech tree leave some faint traces behind: over-optimistic sci-fi stories, outdated educational cartoons, and, sometimes, some obscure accessories that briefly made it to mass production before being quietly discontinued.

[...]

I recently spent a few months in one of these abandoned timelines: the one where the microwave oven replaced the stove.

First, I had to get myself a copy of the world’s saddest book.

[...]

Marie T. Smith’s Microwave Cooking for One is an old forgotten book of microwave recipes from the 1980s. In the mid-2010s, it garnered the momentary attention of the Internet as “the world’s saddest cookbook”:

To the modern eye, it seems obvious that microwave cooking can only be about reheating ready-made frozen food. It’s about staring blankly at the buzzing white box, waiting for the four dreadful beeps that give you permission to eat. It’s about consuming lukewarm processed slop on a rickety formica table, with only the crackling of a flickering neon light piercing through the silence.

Link

Lords of the Ring | Harper’s Magazine

16-minute read

Hoshoryu had become sumo’s seventy-fourth yokozuna in January, but his promotion was not without an element of controversy. Some of the council members reportedly felt that he was not yet ready, that he had too often lost bouts to lesser fighters. Their objections were overruled, but these doubts were a problem not only for the pedants and purists, but for those invested in the bitter, long-standing rivalry between Japanese-born rikishi and Mongolian wrestlers like Hoshoryu. Since 1992, when the first of Hoshoryu’s countrymen began competing, there have been more than seventy Mongolian rikishi, many of whom have dominated sumo’s upper echelons. This was most gloriously personified by the yokozuna Hakuho, who became a grand champion in 2007, at just twenty-two years old, and went on to shatter records that had been held by Japanese-born yokozuna for centuries. Hakuho retired in 2021, but the relegation of Japanese rikishi to second-class status remains a statistical fact: of the eight yokozuna to have earned the title in the past quarter century, six have come from Mongolia.

Original link | Archive.is link

The Long Now of the Web: Inside the Internet Archive’s Fight Against Forgetting | Hackernoon

16-minute read

If you stand quietly in the nave of the former Christian Science church on Funston Avenue in San Francisco’s Richmond District, you can hear the sound of the internet breathing. It is not the chaotic screech of a dial-up modem or the ping of a notification, but a steady, industrial hum—a low-frequency thrum generated by hundreds of spinning hard drives and the high-velocity fans that cool them. This is the headquarters of the Internet Archive, a non-profit library that has taken on the Sisyphean task of recording the entire digital history of human civilization. Here, amidst the repurposed neoclassical columns and wooden pews of a building constructed to worship a different kind of permanence, lies the physical manifestation of the “virtual” world. We tend to think of the internet as an ethereal cloud, a place without geography or mass. But in this building, the internet has weight. It has heat. It requires electricity, maintenance, and a constant battle against the second law of thermodynamics. As of late 2025, this machine—collectively known as the Wayback Machine—has archived over one trillion web pages. It holds 99 petabytes of unique data, a number that expands to over 212 petabytes when accounting for backups and redundancy.

[...]

The Internet Archive’s mission is “Universal Access to All Knowledge.” This mission is morally compelling but legally perilous.

Link

Say Goodbye to the Undersea Cable That Made the Global Internet Possible | WIRED

11-minute read

Sharks are innocent. Or at least they’re not eating the internet. As a family of cartilaginous fish, sharks are collectively not guilty of most, if not all, charges of biting, chomping, chewing, or otherwise attacking the underwater network of fiber-optic cables. The people who build and maintain the nearly 600 subsea cables that carry almost all of our intercontinental traffic—supporting just about every swipe, tap, Zoom, and doomscroll anywhere on the planet—have a love-hate relationship with this myth, which has persisted for decades. They might even hate that I’m starting this piece with it.

If a cable is suspended over the seabed, a shark might gum it as it explores. Sometimes they’ll lunge for a cable that’s being pulled out of the water. But for a shark to actually bite a cable, you’d have to wrap it in fish, much as you’d hide a pill in a hunk of cheese for the dog. Rats can be a threat on land, because their incisors never stop growing, so they like to file them down on semisoft cables. But nobody ever asks about rats, maybe because, as a friend of mine pointed out, “sharks make you cool, but rats sound like you have a problem.”

[...]

TAT-8 would witness the fall of the Berlin Wall, the birth of the World Wide Web, the end of the Soviet Union, the dotcom boom, the end of Tory rule in the UK and the beginning of the Bush years in the US, the September 11 attacks, the dotcom crash, and the dawn of social media (it was Friendster). Rather than being the last cable ever needed, as had originally been believed, it was full to capacity within 18 months, by which point there were other cables, like PTAT-1 across the Atlantic and TPC-3 in the Pacific. By 2001, the TAT series was up to number 14. After developing a fault that was too expensive to be worth fixing, TAT-8 was taken out of service in 2002.

Original link | Archive.is link

2 stars

This Texas Teenager Is One of the World’s Most Feared Fighters. Don’t Expect Her to Talk About It. | Texas Monthly

7-minute read

On a drizzly November morning, inside Kingsway Jiu-Jitsu—a strip mall gym wedged between an indoor driving range and a medical testing lab in North Austin—John Danaher sat on a mat near a vinyl logo advertising The Joe Rogan Experience. The podcaster grinned from the wall as Danaher gazed ahead, his bald head pitched forward and his bare feet folded beneath him. Before him, nineteen acolytes grappled in silence, each striving to master what practitioners call the gentle art. He looked pleased.

In a corner of the room, an eighteen-year-old girl with a high ponytail and bright blue nail polish was busy dominating a series of male training partners, some at least twenty pounds heavier than her. By the end of the hour-and-a-half-long session, Helena Crevar’s cheeks were flushed, her hair wispy. But she did not look tired. As Danaher looked on, she latched onto an adversary’s leg and twisted it into a lock. “Ow!” he blurted, and they broke apart. As anyone who’s sparred with Helena knows, wait too long to tap and you might get hurt.

[...]

Her coach from that time, Ruben Delgadillo, remembers Helena as a shy yet precocious girl who liked to bake cookies, collect porcelain dolls, and research jujitsu obsessively, texting him links to moves she wanted to try. Her focus and precision seemed almost preternatural. “She was like an android,” he says. “If you told her to move three inches to the left, she’d move exactly three inches to the left.”

Original link | Archive.is link

Coding After Coders: The End of Computer Programming as We Know It | New York Times [gift article]

16-minute read

In the era of A.I. agents, many Silicon Valley programmers are now barely programming. Instead, what they’re doing is deeply, deeply weird.

Original link | Archive.is link

Last Rights | Astral Codex Ten

9-minute read

Everyone hates Congress. That poll showing that cockroaches are more popular than Congress is now thirteen years old, and things haven’t improved in those thirteen years. Congressional approval dipped below 20% during the Great Recession and hasn’t recovered since.

A republic where a supermajority of citizens neither like nor trust their representatives is not the most stable of foundations, so it should not be shocking that the legislative branch is being subsumed by the executive.

What’s the solution? Many have been proposed, some with very snazzy websites.

[...]

These proposals, no matter which direction they’re coming from, have two things in common. The first is that they largely agree on the problem: members of Congress are disconnected from their constituents. Thanks to a combination of huge gerrymandered districts, national partisan polarization, and the influence of large donors, a representative has little incentive to care about the experience of individual people in their district.

The second thing that all these proposed solutions have in common is that none of them will ever be implemented. They all involve acts of Congress - and members of Congress have no incentive to vote to change broken systems that currently benefit them. Why would you want to stop gerrymandering when it’s the reason you don’t have to run a real campaign to stay in office? Why would you vote to give yourself more work? Why would you vote to make it harder for people to give you money? If we want to fix Congress, we need a solution that doesn’t involve Congress.

Luckily for us, such a solution exists: if we get 27 states to ratify the Congressional Apportionment Amendment, then we can make some real progress towards fixing Congress without Congressional buy-in. This solution is not a new idea. It comes up every few years and gets little traction. My hope in writing this piece is that it gets more traction now.

Link

The Man Who Stole Infinity | Quanta Magazine

15-minute read

In an 1874 paper, Georg Cantor proved that there are different sizes of infinity and changed math forever. A trove of newly unearthed letters shows that it was also an act of plagiarism.

Link

Are we in the foothills of World War 3? | Noahpinion

7-minute read

This example illustrates that although World War 2 officially began when Germany invaded Poland, conflicts that either foreshadowed the final conflagration or eventually merged with it began years earlier, in the mid-1930s. WW2 had foothills.

[...]

It’s possible that the world will avoid a world war in the first half of the 21st century. But if one does occur, I think future historians will see it as having had foothills as well. In the Syrian Civil War, the U.S. and Russia began to test their new hardware against each other, and their troops even clashed once. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was the big shift, as it inaugurated a new era of great-power territorial conquest, began to harden global alliance systems, and pushed Europe to remilitarize.

Now we have the Iran War. The U.S. and Israel started the war, attacking Iran and decapitating much of its leadership. The Iranians, somewhat oddly, responded by launching missile and drone attacks on practically every Arab nation in the Middle East, causing some of them to threaten to join the war on America and Israel’s side.

Link

Orcas haven’t changed, but our view of the killer whale has | Aeon

12-minute read

‘Orcas are psychos,’ quipped a close friend recently. He wasn’t joking, nor was he ill-informed. In fact, he is probably the world’s leading historian of whales and people. He had just watched a BBC Earth clip, narrated by David Attenborough, in which three killer whales separate a male humpback calf from his mother in the waters of Western Australia. The video’s closing footage, with two of the orcas escorting the naive youngster to his imminent death, resembles nothing so much as a kidnapping:

Many people might regard my friend’s comment as anachronistic. Following the first live display at marine parks in the mid-1960s, the frightening reputation of orcas vanished almost overnight. For decades after, when most people thought of the species, they pictured commercialised versions such as Shamu or the eponymous orca of Free Willy (1993) – virtual sea pandas. That warm and fuzzy image survived Blackfish (2013), whose viewers generally accepted the documentary’s thesis that orca attacks on trainers were due to the evils of captivity.

Recent encounters in the wild have only cemented this view. Researchers have observed orcas apparently offering gifts to human swimmers, as well as sophisticated group behaviours such as food sharing. Even the recent trend of killer whales disabling and sinking yachts near Gibraltar seems to have elicited sentiments of environmental guilt and socioeconomic catharsis rather than fear – at least from people not on the boats. Orcas have decided to ‘eat the rich’ and ‘take back the ocean’, declared the Twitterverse. The top marine predators were taking revenge for the harm humans had done them.

Link

1 star

A Plain Anabaptist story: the Hutterites. | Ulmer

5-minute read

Five hundred years after Jakob Hutter was executed in Innsbruck, the community that bears his name is very much alive. The Hutterite story is above all a story of near-extinction and recovery. A movement that counted 20,000–30,000 members in its Moravian golden age was reduced by the Counter-Reformation, the Thirty Years’ War, and decades of flight through Slovakia and Transylvania to a remnant of sixty-seven people. That it survived at all is largely an accident of geography — the tolerance of the Russian steppe — and of a remarkable encounter in 1755 in Alwinz, where a handful of expelled Lutheran refugees stumbled into a dying Hutterite community and brought it back to life. Today’s 58,000 Hutterites are, in a very real sense, the descendants of that meeting.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Rattlesnakes at My Door | Oxford American

21-minute read

It is the shortest story in American literature: a rattlesnake appears, a man kills it, and he is celebrated as a hero. This scenario is so well understood by readers of both fiction and non-fiction that it barely needs writing. A hero can be made and evil vanquished in two or three sentences. Often, the killing is not even a part of the action, but a story told by a character to establish character. From Stephen Crane to Joan Didion, the bodies pile up. The act is never questioned, the morality clear, the point succinctly made. The ubiquitous threat of rattlesnakes is a trope that even children learn from their formative books:

[...]

We were at a loss, impatient to utilize the springhouse. We’d be using the dark, unlighted outbuilding to store all of our tools and lumber. It would be insane to allow venomous snakes to hide in the clutter. So, we finally adopted the ending that my English major had pre-determined for us. We agonized, but felt out of options. He was huge and really, really did not want to move. We knew no one in the area, had no phone reception or Internet on the mountain yet. Without mail service, we couldn’t even write a letter for help.

Of course, I made my husband do it. Nowhere had I ever read of a woman fulfilling this patriotic rite.

Link

My Mother’s Body | VQR

16-minute read

Alone in the cottage, I thought about the past asserting itself on the present and longed for my mother, who plunged to her death in a stairwell when she was forty-three. I was thirteen.

My mother was commensurate with the world, the first person to teach me I was a person, distinct, a self. To lose her was to become unmoored, to lose my bearing on time and place.

[...]

I returned to New York, taken with this idea of a conversation with the past, however painful it might be. When I told friends and colleagues that I was looking for my mother’s file, I was met with misgivings. An unsentimental older friend bluntly asked what I hoped to achieve. I didn’t think it would do anything. Some things are irredeemably bad and resistant to our narrative efforts, I told her, knowing my protests disavowed the notebook in my bag and my life as a writer.

A few months later, I heard from Rigsarkivet. I could only get the file in person. And so, in late June, I was back in Copenhagen, walking along lakes that mirrored the weak gray sky.

Link

Plume | The Bitter Southerner

11-minute read

July 8, 1905. A blood-soaked, small wooden skiff bobbed in the waves, adrift off the eastern short of Cape Sable in Florida Bay. Inside, a man lay dead from a single gunshot wound, a revolver by his side.

There are a million ways to die here in the waters surrounding the Everglades and the Ten Thousand Islands. These include: venomous snakes, alligators, crocodiles, sharks, swarms of mosquitoes, punishing heat, and the near constant threat of tropical storms and hurricanes. The man had understood that, here, nature gives no quarter.

He also knew that this vast and wild frontier provided cover to murderous outlaws, poachers, bootleggers, fugitives, and a Seminole tribe fighting against their forced removal by the United States government.

He was keenly aware that certain men wanted him dead, simply because his job was protecting local birds whose plumage had become more valuable than gold in the Gilded Age lust for exotic millinery. Still, he persisted, paddling and slogging across vast distances in an audacious bid to defend the defenseless, and knowing it would likely cost him his life.

His name was Guy Bradley, and we are chasing his ghost.

Link

Anthropic and Alignment | Stratechery

10-minute read

If AI is a weapon, why don’t we regulate it like one? | Noahpinion

10-minute read

I have tremendous respect for what Anthropic has done recently and find it hard to agree with the next two pieces. But the arguments are cogent...

What is important to note is that the entire debate is ultimately pointless: the very concept of “international law” is fake, not because pertinent statutes and agreements don’t exist, but because their effectiveness is ultimately rooted in their enforceability. That, by extension, means there must be an entity to enact such enforcement, with the capability to match, and such an entity does not exist.

[...]

Our adversaries, meanwhile, will certainly be developing autonomous fighting capabilities (and yes, I admit my chip prescriptions make this more likely much sooner — tradeoffs are hard!); the U.S. will need to move in this direction if we are to remain the ultimate source of international law. And, by the U.S., I mean a democratically elected President and Congress, not a San Francisco executive. I don’t want that, and, more pertinently, the ones with guns aren’t going to tolerate it. Anthropic needs to align itself with that reality.

Link

If you haven’t heard about the fight between the AI company Anthropic and the U.S. Department of War, you should read about it, because it could be critical for our future — as a nation, but also as a species.

[...]

To exist and carry out its basic functions, a nation-state must have a monopoly on the use of force. If a private militia can defeat the nation-state militarily, the nation-state is no longer physically able to make laws, provide for the common defense, ensure public safety, or execute the will of the people.

Link

The End of Mail in Denmark | The Dial

7-minute read

I didn’t end up with a job in health care or the postal service. It’s probably a good thing I changed my mind about the latter, because on December 30, 2025, the company known as PostNord delivered the very last physical letter in Denmark. Actual, brick-and-mortar post offices no longer exist here. No more Postman Pat. No more dad jokes about kids “looking kind of like the mailman.” They’ve also removed the beautiful, distinctive-looking red postboxes from our streets. The only place you’ll find a postbox these days is in “The Children’s Post Office,” which for inexplicable reasons is still available for purchase. I think they might have added a fake ATM since I was a kid; these too are on their way to becoming extinct.

[...]

In Denmark, we’ve been talking a lot in recent years about the rise of a digital underclass in our otherwise flawless welfare state. It’s made up not just of older people and those living on the social margins, as one might expect, but also of people who work manual jobs, for example, and therefore haven’t previously needed to upload their entire lives into the digital space. Studies show that between 20 and 25 percent of Danes belong to the “digitally disadvantaged,” which means that they struggle to use the more than 100 digital platforms dedicated to public services now bogging down our society. Every Danish person has a “digital mailbox,” for instance, which we are required to check. If we don’t, we’re punished. Let me explain one way that this might happen: The Danish government withholds 12.5 percent of each individual’s salary. It’s known as “holiday money,” which to be honest I always thought was a little infantilizing, like we’re not capable of figuring out how to save up for our own holidays. Once a year, by a particular deadline, you have to apply to have it paid back into your account. One man missed a notification in his digital mailbox reminding him to apply to receive his own money (roughly 6,000 kroner, or $1,100), and as a result, the state simply decided to keep it.

Link

2 stars

On Being a Dad | Derek Thompson

4-minute read

A lovely piece:

My daughter and I have played this game approximately one thousand times. Nothing in my life could have anticipated this hunter-prey pageantry or the joy I get from it. I’m not a monster guy, generally speaking. Friends who had kids before me never once pulled me aside to whisper, “oh, another thing, you will have to pretend to be a monster all the time.” But I’m struck by the sense that I was born to play this game just as she was born to play it.

Parenthood is everything you’ve heard: confusion, panic, joy, sadness, anxiety, boredom, and anxiety again. Beneath these passing moods is a deeper feeling for which there is no good word. It is the feeling of suddenly finding yourself playing the oldest game in the world, a game you know that billions of people have played before you. There is nothing about being a parent that isn’t a cliché. This is a terrible inconvenience for the suckers out there who try to write essays about it. But I also find this to be an existential balm: I was built for this, and it was built for me.

One way to think about life is that you are locked inside an amusement park. The park has no clear purpose. It’s just there, and so are you. You ride the rides, and then it’s lights out. Falling in love is a ride, and making deep friendships is a ride, and sex is a ride, because these are all experiences that were built for us to do. And then, stretching over the park, there is a twisty and vertiginous rollercoaster called “having a child.” Parenthood is not special. It’s just another ride in the park. But it is there, and it was built for us, and we were built for it, too.

So, that is a second reason to become a parent. You’re in this amusement park only once, and I think you might as well ride the rides.

Link

When Coyotes Threatened Livestock on Central Texas Ranches, the Solution Was to Unlock an Ancient Ability in Dogs | Smithsonian Magazine

14-minute read

By 2016, it was clear to Grant that the status quo wouldn’t hold. He was losing as many as 20 percent of his lambs and kid goats to predators, and he knew things could get worse: On the Edwards Plateau, 50 percent and even 90 percent losses were not unheard of. Coyotes were driving some stockmen out of business, others to the brink of collapse, and generally threatening a way of life that is integral to Texan identity. “It’s like having an ever-increasing-

size hole in your canoe, and you’re trying to bail out water,” Grant said. In desperation, he decided to go see a fellow rancher about a decade younger than his father who was reputed to have cultivated an ancient knowledge, largely neglected in the United States, that had allowed him to prosper while his neighbors flailed. His name was Bob Buchholz. He was a man who knew about dogs.

Link

Mantic Monday: Groundhog Day | Astral Codex Ten

11-minute read

On Friday, the Pentagon declared AI company Anthropic a “supply chain risk”, a designation never before given to an American firm. This unprecedented move was seen as an attempt to punish, maybe destroy the company. How effective was it?

Anthropic isn’t publicly traded, so we turn to the prediction markets. Ventuals.com has a “perpetual future” on Anthropic stock, a complicated instrument attempting to track the company’s valuation, to be resolved at the IPO.

[...]

The chance of Anthropic getting a $500 billion+ valuation in 2026 fell from 90% to 76%, before rebounding to 83%.

Why have the markets shrugged off this seemingly important event?

Link

Climate Physicists Face the Ghosts in Their Machines: Clouds | Quanta

7-minute read

In October 2008, Chris Bretherton lifted off from the coast of northern Chile in a C-130 turboprop plane. It was too dark to see the sandy hills of the Atacama Desert below, but the darkness suited Bretherton just fine. The researcher wasn’t going sightseeing. Seated directly behind the pilots, he kept his focus entirely on the sky.

The plane was stuffed with instruments, and its wings bristled with sensors and other devices. Bretherton’s immediate mission was to help the pilots collect information about the ice, water vapor, and air pressure around them. His longer-term goal was to use that data — as well as data he would collect over California, Hawai‘i, and Antarctica — to deal with one of the most challenging factors in climate science: clouds.

Link

Apocalypse no: how almost everything we thought we knew about the Maya is wrong | The Guardian

12-minute read

Last year, Estrada-Belli’s team, including his Tulane University colleague Marcello A Canuto, published a study with a central finding that would have seemed, just a few years ago, like an outrageously speculative overestimate. When Estrada-Belli first came to Tikal as a child, the best estimate for the classic-era (AD600-900) population of the surrounding Maya lowlands – encompassing present day southern Mexico, Belize and northern Guatemala – would have been about 2 million people. Today, his team believes that the region was home to up to 16 million. That is more than five times the area’s current population. This would mean that more people lived in the classic-era Maya lowlands than on the Italian peninsula during the peak of the Roman empire – all crammed into an area a third of the size.

Link

Superintelligence is already here, today | Noahpinion

12-minute read

People argue back and forth about when artificial superintelligence will arrive. The truth is that it’s already here.

[...]

A lot of people who think about the risks of superintelligence — and those risks are very real — ask what the upside is. Why would we invent a technology that has the capability to end human civilization? What might we get that could possibly justify that risk?

I don’t know where the cost/benefit calculation lies. But I’m pretty sure that the #1 answer to this question is better science. Before AI showed up, scientific discovery was hitting a wall — the picking of much of the Universe’s low-hanging fruit meant that ideas were getting more expensive to find, and requiring research manpower that the human race simply was not producing at sufficient scale.

Now, thanks to the invention of superintelligence and the supercharging of scientific productivity, we will be able to break through that wall. Fantastic sci-fi materials, robots that can do anything we want, and therapies that can cure any disease are just the beginning. There is a whole lot left to discover about this Universe, and thanks to superintelligence, a lot more of it is going to get discovered.

Link

Pregnant women’s brains shed grey matter to prime them for motherhood, study suggests | BBC News

4-minute read

“Baby brain” is a cliche long-used to describe women becoming forgetful and feeling less capable during pregnancy.

But a recent study - the largest to date - indicates that pregnancy has a profound structural impact on brains and offers new clues into the neurological changes in mums‑to‑be.

It suggests that grey matter - the nerve-rich part of the brain involved in processing information, emotions and empathy - decreases by an average of nearly 5% during pregnancy.

But rather than being a cause for concern, these changes may be beneficial when it comes to caring for newborns, say scientists working on the project in Spain.

Link

How Metrics Make Us Miserable | Derek Thompson

12-minute read

My mentor, the philosopher Barbara Herman, a Kantian ethicist, once told me, “I think you’re just confusing a goal and a purpose.” And I was like, “There’s no difference between a goal and a purpose.” And she said, “Of course there is. When you have friends over for cards, the goal is to win, but the purpose is to have fun.” And I think that structure is so common in games, where the goal that you aim at in the game is separate from the reason you play the game. I call it “striving play.”

Striving play is when you’re trying to win, not because winning is valuable, because you want something about the process. Party games make this particularly clear, because when you have your friends over and—unless you’re a complete asshole—if you try to win, but you lose, and you all had a great time, you don’t think the evening has been wasted.

I think the crucial thing here is to understand the structure of games. You have to understand that for some people, winning is the purpose. Their goal and purpose are one. If they just want to win, they just want to win. But for some of us, I rock climb to clear my mind. And what’s interesting is I cannot clear my mind by trying to clear my mind. So the philosophers have a name for this: a self-effacing end. You cannot clear your mind by trying to clear your mind. You try to clear your mind by trying to climb the rock as hard as you can and forgetting that you’re trying to clear your mind.

Link

1 star

This Is the Worst Thing That Could Happen to the International Space Station | WIRED

6-minute read

In the vacuum of space, the amount of debris—spent rocket stages, splintered satellites, micrometeoroids—numbers in the millions, all zooming about, often at 17,000 mph speeds. They’re also constantly hitting each other in a tsuris of exponential littering. Most of these pieces are tiny, and many are not anywhere near the altitude of the ISS. But the area isn’t completely clean.

Debris actually pelts the ISS all the time, and noticeable dents and cracks line the exteriors. But should something fully breach the station, cabin atmosphere will seep into the vacuum of space and alarms will go off. Pressure gauges will confirm to astronauts that the station has, almost certainly, been hit, and the speed of the seepages may indicate how much time the crew has to respond. According to one NASA estimate, a 0.6-centimeter-wide hole leaves 14 hours to plug the leak. A 20-centimeter hole leaves less than a minute.

[...]

But in the worst worst-case scenario, we don’t have any control. Instead, the station will crack through the atmosphere. Sure, many pieces will likely end up in the ocean, but some might hit people, possibly in a town or a city. The station could break apart across thousands of miles and multiple continents. This would be exceedingly hard to anticipate. As NASA puts it, “Calculating the probability of this penetration cascading into loss of deorbit capability has a very large range of variables, making predictions ineffective.”

Original link | Archive.is link

Freak Out! | The Pursuit of Happiness

3-minute read

When is it time to panic? The answer is simple. It’s time to panic when the act of panicking works to prevent the thing that you were worrying about. Here are some examples:

1. After Trump announced his “Liberation Day” tariffs, the markets panicked. Trump’s advisors realized that they had made a serious error and persuaded Trump to back off.

2. After Trump hinted that he would appoint Kevin Hassett to be the new Fed chair, people were appalled. There was so much pushback that it became clear that Hassett might have difficulty getting approved. Trump backed off.

3. After Trump threatened to take Greenland from Denmark, there was so much criticism from both our allies in Europe and key figures in Congress that Trump was forced to back off and leave Greenland alone.

4. After Trump sent ICE agents into America’s bluest cities with instructions to get tough, the public became so outraged that Trump was forced to back off, ICE agents were moved to less volatile places, and Kristi Noem was fired.

[...]

The real problem is that there has recently been far too little panic. People did not freak out when the Trump administration ordered the US military to begin murdering Venezuelan civilians on small boats in the Caribbean. Because there was no widespread panic, the murders have continued.

There was also very little panic when businessmen and foreign governments paid bribes of hundreds of millions of dollars in exchange for favors from the Trump administration. As a result, the bribes have continued.

Link

SEIU Delenda Est | Astral Codex Ten

6-minute read

On one level, it’s no surprise that California, a state full of bad socialists, is considering bad socialist policy. But I think this is the wrong perspective. This proposition isn’t being sponsored by some generic group of Piketty-reading leftists. It’s the project of SEIU (Service Employees International Union) a union of mostly healthcare workers.

This immediately clarifies the debate about whether it’s net negative for revenue. 90% of the revenue from the tax is earmarked for health care. So even if it’s net negative for the state, it isn’t net negative for the health care budget in particular, ie for the people who are sponsoring the measure.

But we can get even more conspiratorial. The SEIU is known in California political circles for pioneering and perfecting the art of extortion via ballot initiative.

Link

A Zone Under Antarctica Has the Weakest Gravity on Earth—and It’s Evolving, Scientists Say | Popular Mechanics

2-minute read

The “gravity hole”—a region under Antarctica where gravity is unusually low—began to form at least 70 million years ago.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Bad Lunch | The Sun Magazine

12-minute read

April 1999, one o’clock in the afternoon. I was cooking on the 150-foot motor yacht The Rental Cow when Megan, our chief stewardess, swooped into the galley to tell me our guests were displeased with their lunch.

“What’s wrong?” I asked.

“I don’t know,” she said. A petite, blond Australian who often made bawdy jokes, she didn’t wear her usual smile. Instead she looked slightly frightened, which told me this was no ordinary complaint. Our two guests were paying $30,000 a day to sit on the top decks and take in the Mediterranean views. Like every set of guests on board that yacht, this couple needed the food to be perfectly suited to their tastes, which caused me hours of nail-biting anxiety as I sent up plate after plate, taking note of what they devoured or ignored.

Link

How far back in time can you understand English? | Dead Language Society

11-minute read

As his post goes on, his language gets older. A hundred years older with each jump. The spelling changes. The grammar changes. Words you know are replaced by unfamiliar words, and his attitude gets older too, as the blogger’s voice is replaced by that of a Georgian diarist, an Elizabethan pamphleteer, a medieval chronicler.

By the middle of his post, he’s writing in what might as well be a foreign language.

But it’s not a foreign language. It’s all English.

None of the story is real: not the blogger, not the town. But the language is real, or at least realistic. I constructed the passages myself, working from what we know about how English was written in each period.

It’s a thousand years of the English language, compressed into a single blog post.

Read it and notice where you start to struggle. Notice where you give up entirely. Then meet me on the other side and I’ll tell you what happened to the language (and the blogger).

Link

Baby-Making on Mars | Broadcast

20-minute read

Humanity has entered a new era of space exploration. This time, we don’t just want to visit, we want to stay. From Musk and Bezos to former NASA administrator Michael Griffin and the late astrophysicist Stephen Hawking, advocates for moving off-planet increasingly frame the need to migrate as imperative to our survival, key to withstanding existential threats and building long-term resilience. But if getting to space will be a feat of engineering, staying there will be a feat of biology.

Link

At Last, Hydrofoils | Changing Lanes

10-minute read

The Navier N30 looks deceptively ordinary on land, like a surprisingly-oversized luxury day boat. The magic reveals itself when you see what’s underneath. Three carbon-fiber wings extend below the hull, each carefully shaped to generate lift as water flows over them. At speed, these foils will lift the entire six-passenger vessel four feet above the water’s surface; the boat seems to be flying.

Understanding what the N30 represents made me believe that urban water transit, a category I’d previously dismissed as impractical, might finally become real.

[...]

What’s changed is the convergence of three technological shifts. As Bhattacharyya explained when I asked what’s different from Boeing’s era: “Three things really change the dynamics from the technology perspective: cheaper, faster computing and sensing, batteries, and scalable manufacturing.” We can see all three in Navier’s N30.

Link

On Tilt | Harper’s Magazine

14-minute read

But even if I weren’t hardwired to crave a rush, there’s a good chance I would have found my way to sports betting anyway. The Supreme Court struck down a twenty-six-year-old federal ban in 2018, and today, thirty-nine states and the District of Columbia permit the activity. Nearly half of all American men aged eighteen to forty-nine maintain an online sports-betting account, a statistic surely buttressed by a multibillion-dollar advertising blitz.

Original link | Archive.is link

2 stars

When the Flames Went Out | Los Angeles Review of Books

11-minute read

A couple days after my house burned down, my mom called with a delayed revelation: her house in Saigon, Vietnam, had also burned down, when she was a child. The detail that stuck—she ran out holding her pillow. For comfort, maybe. Or, simply, because it was there.

What unsettled me was how she told the story. She kept interrupting herself to say “I did not remember.” I wondered if I would ever forget. Repression is its own gift: memory wrapped for you, ready to open when it’s needed—or not.

Link

Bang the Drumstick Slowly | New York Review of Books

10-minute read

There was an actual, historic chicken that ran around like a chicken with its head cut off. In the 1940s Mike, a Colorado rooster on his way to the dinner table, survived an incomplete decapitation that left enough of his brain stem intact that he remained partly functional and could run around. During the eighteen months he lived in this condition, his owner toured the United States and exhibited him as a sideshow attraction. In Under the Henfluence: Inside the World of Backyard Chickens and the People Who Love Them, Tove Danovich describes Mike sympathetically but says that he “wasn’t great for the reputation of the chicken.”

She says that chickens are smart and soulful, and she regrets that people make fun of them. Philip Levy, the author of Yard Birds: The Lives and Times of America’s Urban Chickens, feels the same. He says, “One of my goals is to make people think twice before laughing at chickens.” Some immutable principles of humor work against this goal, however, because chickens are humor, in a sense, and even their long overuse to get a laugh will not discourage people from using them to get one.

Original link | Archive.is link

The Murder of The Washington Post | The Atlantic

10-minute read

We’re witnessing a murder.

Jeff Bezos, the billionaire owner of The Washington Post, and Will Lewis, the publisher he appointed at the end of 2023, are embarking on the latest step of their plan to kill everything that makes the paper special. The Post has survived for nearly 150 years, evolving from a hometown family newspaper into an indispensable national institution, and a pillar of the democratic system. But if Bezos and Lewis continue down their present path, it may not survive much longer.

Original link | Archive.is link

A century in the Siberian wilderness: the Old Believers who time forgot | The Guardian

10-minute read

In the summer of 1978, a team of geologists exploring southern Siberia found something rarer than diamonds. While searching for a helicopter landing site amid the steep hills and forested canyons of the western Sayan mountains, their pilot caught sight of what appeared to be a garden, 150 miles from the nearest settlement. Hovering as low as he could, he saw a house. No people were visible, but someone was clearly tending the garden. He and his geologist passengers were shocked to find a dwelling in an area long considered too remote for human habitation.

Link

Science Fiction isn’t Predictive, but It’s Important Anyway | Sophie’s Notes

4-minute read

A piece of AI science fiction moved a trillion dollars this week.

It doesn’t matter whether Citrini’s 2028 “Global Intelligence Crisis” is prescient (it’s explicitly a scenario, not a prediction) or whether it’s “doomer porn.” The interesting part is that markets treated a thought experiment like a leaked earnings report.

The sell-off this week functioned like a stress test of the market’s “AI anxiety”, a reminder that (a) investors are poorly anchored on how to value software moats in an agentic world, and (b) macro narratives about labor and demand are being fought with thin and lagging measurement.

Citrini frames three connected risks: (1) software margins collapse when incumbents lose pricing power, (2) competitive dynamics accelerate disruption faster than diffusion models predict, and (3) consumer spending buckles if white-collar workers shift from “secure” to “maybe not”, even before official unemployment data shows it.

[...]

Some of the rebuttals seem to blatantly misread the software sell-off. No one credible is claiming that AI is going to replace incumbents tomorrow. The risk is in pricing power.

Software is effectively a user interface that sits on top of a database, where the vendor locks in customers through switching costs and network effects. AI agents upend that. Customers can now say, “This is our data. We’re building our own interface.”

Link

I Thought I Knew Silicon Valley. I Was Wrong | WIRED

12-minute read

It should be the best of times for the tech world, supercharged by a boom in artificial intelligence. But a shadow has fallen over Silicon Valley. The community still overwhelmingly leans left. But with few exceptions, its leaders are responding to Donald Trump by either keeping quiet or actively courting the government. One indelible image of this capture is from Trump’s second inauguration, where a decisive quorum of tech’s elite, after dutifully kicking in million-dollar checks, occupied front-row seats.

Original link | Archive.is link

Death of an Indian tech worker | Rest of World

10-minute read

On a warm night last May, Nikhil Somwanshi sent his roommate a WhatsApp message asking him to tell his family that what was about to happen next was an accident.

The message triggered a frantic search for the 24-year-old machine-learning engineer in southeast Bengaluru, the city of 13 million known as India’s Silicon Valley.

[...]

But something has gone awry in the industry Somwanshi was entering. Eighty-three percent of India’s tech workers suffer from burnout, according to one recent survey. One in four clocks over 70 hours a week. In Karnataka state, home to Bengaluru, tech workers account for a starkly disproportionate 20% of patients seeking transplants due to organ failure, according to a leading regional newspaper. A study of tech employees in the IT hub of Hyderabad found that 84% had a liver disease linked to long hours of sedentary work and high stress.

Some of India’s tech leaders, meanwhile, are advocating 70-hour and even 90-hour workweeks, instead of the national legal maximum of 48.

Link

How Markdown took over the world | Anil Dash

12-minute read

Nearly every bit of the high-tech world, from the most cutting-edge AI systems at the biggest companies, to the casual scraps of code cobbled together by college students, is annotated and described by the same, simple plain text format. Whether you’re trying to give complex instructions to ChatGPT, or you want to be able to exchange a grocery list in Apple Notes or copy someone’s homework in Google Docs, that same format will do the trick. The wild part is, the format wasn’t created by a conglomerate of tech tycoons, it was created by a curmudgeonly guy with a kind heart who right this minute is probably rewatching a Kubrick film while cheering for an absolutely indefensible sports team.

Link

After 54 Years, Astronauts Are Going Back to the Moon | TIME

11-minute read

Humanity has changed an awful lot in the past 58 Years. The moon? Not so much. It was in 1968 that astronauts first drew near the moon, and it will be early this year, if all goes as planned, that a crew will return, representing a species with gadgets and abilities—and yes, problems—that didn’t exist that half-century-plus ago.

Link

When Does a Divorce Begin? | The Yale Review

13-minute read

Most people think of it as failure. For me it was an achievement.

Original link | Archive.is link

Rockhopper Penguins’ Athleticism Makes Them the Daredevils of the Animal World. Will a Warming Climate Slow Them Down? | Smithsonian Magazine

10-minute read

On a rocky ledge over the coast of an island in the far south Atlantic Ocean, a young penguin peers nervously at the chasm ahead. Her bushy yellow eyebrows waggle as she tilts her head one way, then another, scouting the route home to her nest high above. This next step will be a doozy. To reach the ledge on the other side, she’ll have to make a gravity-defying leap more than twice her diminutive height. Her wet feathers shimmer in the setting sun as she musters her courage. “You can do it,” Petra Quillfeldt coaxes the little penguin. “You’re a rockhopper!”

The coach’s confidence is well founded. Quillfeldt, a seabird ecologist from Justus Liebig University Giessen in Germany, has been visiting this southern rockhopper colony in the Falkland Islands for nearly 20 years, studying how the penguins, with their piston-like bodies, are being affected by climate and ocean conditions. As if buoyed by the pep talk, the hesitant bird cocks her flightless wings. Her powerful pink feet push off the rock with tremendous force. She catapults across the gap and sticks the landing with the clasp of strong, gripping claws. After a beat to shake her feathers and toss us a backward glance, she hops off to join her colony-mates bounding up the steep hill.

Link

The Pentagon Threatens Anthropic | Astral Codex Ten

5-minute read

13 thoughts on Anthropic, OpenAI and the Department of War | Silver Bulletin

4-minute read

I’ve been debating it on Twitter all day and think I have a pretty good grasp on where I disagree with the (thankfully small number of) Hegseth defenders. Here are some pre-emptive arguments so I don’t have to relitigate them all in the comments.

Link

February 2026 is likely to be remembered by historians as the inflection point when we moved into some sort of accelerated timeline on AI-related developments. Not necessarily with respect to the technology itself (although see bullet #3 below); I remain fairly skeptical of the hyper-turbocharged timelines toward superintelligence envisioned by the AI 2027 report, for example. But the point at which AI became a major storyline — maybe the major storyline — in politics and economics, too big even for the skeptics to ignore. The 42 percent of people who said that AI will only be “a marginal issue” or “a non-issue” in the 2028 election in this Twitter poll a week ago are probably going to be wrong.

Link

Iran Strategy: The “Deep State” at Work? | David H Levey

3-minute read

On Bombing Iran | The Scholar’s Stage

3-minute read

Iran, Cuba, Trump. | News Items

4-minute read

Nobody could believe that our addled, narcissistic president could have come up with a sophisticated military-diplomatic strategy of this type on his own. It is quite likely that he’s doing things for all the bad reasons critics of the war point to -- distracting from Epstein and low popularity, personal financial gain, disregard for constitutional procedure, authoritarian power-grabbing, etc. All of that criticism is perfectly fair and will need to be taken into account in assessing whether the U.S. carries this strategy through to a finish that is positive for the people of Iran, or falls short and leads to chaos or civil war. Nevertheless, the strategy and its likelihood of success or failure needs to be evaluated in its own right.

[...]

Iran, in contrast, doesn’t need “nation-building.” It is a much more developed society with great economic potential and high levels of education, whose population is crying out to be liberated from the repressive, regressive rule of the mullahs and whose young people, especially, are ready to throw off the shackles of theocracy and move toward liberal democracy. As Richard argues, what is needed is regime degradation and removal, so that the people of Iran have a chance to elevate their economy and society to its full potential. We can’t know for sure if that is what is going to result, but it’s worth taking a chance.

Link

A consistent theme in Trumpist policy making across all domains is that Trump tends to demand the maximal aim and then climb back to an achievable one. Thus the “TACO” memes. But it is not difficult to see a certain wisdom in the TACO approach. This is how many of our most successful men—the men Silicon Valley calls “high agency”—make their way through life. They have learned that you will not get what you do not ask for. So ask! Often what you desire is already yours. You need only the gumption to demand it. In most settings there are no downsides to the maximalist gambit. Either you ask for what you want, and are given it; or you ask for what you want, and are given something less. In neither case are you worse for the asking.

[...]

A regime that lasts is a regime that will rebuild. Do we have the stomach to do this again (and then yet again?) in the decades to come? More important still: can we afford to do this again and yet again? Many serving in this administration opposed all American military aid to Ukraine for fear that it might tax our military position in East Asia. This worry presses far more urgently here than it ever did in Ukraine. The American industrial base has atrophied; American stockpiles are limited. The types of munitions we use in an air campaign over Persia come directly at the expense of the munitions we might need to wage an air campaign in the Pacific. The war of the moment can only be justified if it changes the regional dynamics so conclusively that there is no future need to spend blood or treasure there again.

Link

Written before the strikes:

It’s passing strange, politically speaking, that President Trump has chosen to bring the United States to the brink of war, or something like that, in the Middle East. The president knows his political base. He knows what they will abide and what they will not. And he knows that they will not abide a war in the Middle East.

Link

A scoundrel’s last refuge | The Pursuit of Happiness

4-minute read

Back in Wisconsin, almost no one decides on whether they’ll root for the Badgers based on which party currently controls the governorship. That’s a healthy patriotism. For some reason, when we move from the state level to the national level, people become much more irrational in their patriotism, with an unhealthy obsession with politics. I suspect that the public in places like Switzerland and Norway do not decide whether to root for a local athlete based on which political party is in power.

Link

How to be less awkward | Experimental History

10-minute read

Here’s the most replicated finding to come out of my area of psychology in the past decade: most people believe they suffer from a chronic case of awkwardness.

Study after study finds that people expect their conversations to go poorly, when in fact those conversations usually go pretty well. People assign themselves the majority of the blame for any awkward silences that arise, and they believe that they like other people more than other people like them in return. I’ve replicated this effect myself: I once ran a study where participants talked in groups of three, and then they reported/guessed how much each person liked each other person in the conversation. Those participants believed, on average, that they were the least liked person in the trio.

Link

Should the Supreme Court Be “Pro-Congress”? | Wake Up To Politics

9-minute read

For a ruling that has already been called possibly “the most important Supreme Court decision this century,” Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion striking down President Trump’s sweeping, worldwide tariffs was incredibly short and to the point.

[...]

Why, then, does the total amount of writing produced by the court in Learning Resources stretch out over 170 pages? Out of the nine justices, seven wrote opinions in the case: Roberts’ majority opinion, four concurrences, and two dissents.

This morning, we’ll try to tease out some of the nuances that emerge across these writings, especially on a central question that runs throughout all seven, about whether (or to what degree) the Supreme Court should be trying to elevate one of its two fellow branches of government over the other.

Link

Why does America feel worse than other countries? Crime. | Noahpinion

9-minute read

The thesis of this post is that when you compare America to other countries, what stands out as America’s most unique weakness is its very high crime rate — not just violent crime, but also public chaos and disorder. That statement might come as a shock to people who are used to hearing about very different American weaknesses.

For example, it’s common to hear people say that Europeans and Asians “have health care”, and that Americans don’t. That’s just fantasy. Around 92% of Americans, and 95% of American children, have health insurance, and those numbers keep going up.

Link

From island to ice: The origins of Olympic curling stones | Reuters

5-minute read

While the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Games embrace cutting‑edge sporting technology, the equipment for one event remains rooted in tradition. Curling stones are still carved from ancient Scottish rock and shaped much as they were half a century ago.

Link

1 star

H-Bomb: A Frank Lloyd Wright Typographic Mystery | Inconspicuous Consumption

5-minute read

The famed architect made a surprising error on one of his most notable buildings — or did he? A deep dive to uncover the truth.

Link

Falling From Ivy League Grad to Prisoner Expanded My Social Circle | New York Times [gift article]

1-minute read

On my second day into my 16-month sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution in Ashland, Ky., I surprised myself by doing something that I well understood you aren’t supposed to do in prison: I cried.

I had joined the inmate-led Bible study in the prison’s small, drab chapel, pulling a chair up to the circle of a dozen men. A member of the group introduced a short scriptural reading followed by a prompt, and each one of us was given a chance to respond.

I hadn’t yet been able to get access to the prison phone room, and when it was my turn to talk, I told the group how desperately I wanted simply to hear my wife’s voice and get news on how our two young sons were doing. From the guys in the circle, there were no insults, no admonishments to toughen up or be a man. They offered encouragement, comforted me and said that we were all navigating a difficult stretch of life together.

I did not fully understand it then, but the place where I was least free in my life would also become a place where I felt deeply connected to those around me and where I got to experience a level of camaraderie and solidarity that so many on the outside go without. Unlike in the version of prison conjured on TV and in the movies, where shot callers control subordinates, I found a community quick to be generous and much less inclined to try to assert superiority over one another.

Original link | Archive.is link

Some like it hot | The Pursuit of Happiness

3-minute read

At a global level, virtually all population growth is occurring at or near the tropics—mostly Africa and South Asia. Even tropical parts of China are still growing, as the country’s overall population declines. The world is getting hotter in a physical sense—the climate is warming—but it is also getting hotter in a demographic sense, as more and more of the world’s population is living in hot places. Even if the climate were not heating up, the average human would be living in an increasingly hot environment due to both migration and international fertility differences.

Link

We need to talk about naked mole rats | The Oatmeal

2-minute read

What you’d expect from The Oatmeal

Link

Your morning coffee could one day help fight cancer | ScienceDaily

3-minute read

Could something as common as coffee play a role in treating cancer? Scientists at the Texas A&M Health Institute of Biosciences and Technology believe it might. Their research combines caffeine with CRISPR, a powerful gene editing tool known as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, to explore new ways to treat chronic diseases such as cancer and diabetes. The approach relies on a strategy called chemogenetics, which allows researchers to control cells using specific chemical signals.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

What Is Claude? Anthropic Doesn’t Know, Either | New Yorker

26-minute read

A large language model is nothing more than a monumental pile of small numbers. It converts words into numbers, runs those numbers through a numerical pinball game, and turns the resulting numbers back into words. Similar piles are part of the furniture of everyday life. Meteorologists use them to predict the weather. Epidemiologists use them to predict the paths of diseases. Among regular people, they do not usually inspire intense feelings. But when these A.I. systems began to predict the path of a sentence—that is, to talk—the reaction was widespread delirium. As a cognitive scientist wrote recently, “For hurricanes or pandemics, this is as rigorous as science gets; for sequences of words, everyone seems to lose their mind.”

It’s hard to blame them. Language is, or rather was, our special thing. It separated us from the beasts. We weren’t prepared for the arrival of talking machines. Ellie Pavlick, a computer scientist at Brown, has drawn up a taxonomy of our most common responses. There are the “fanboys,” who man the hype wires. They believe that large language models are intelligent, maybe even conscious, and prophesy that, before long, they will become superintelligent. The venture capitalist Marc Andreessen has described A.I. as “our alchemy, our Philosopher’s Stone—we are literally making sand think.” The fanboys’ deflationary counterparts are the “curmudgeons,” who claim that there’s no there there, and that only a blockhead would mistake a parlor trick for the soul of the new machine. In the recent book “The AI Con,” the linguist Emily Bender and the sociologist Alex Hanna belittle L.L.M.s as “mathy maths,” “stochastic parrots,” and “a racist pile of linear algebra.”

But, Pavlick writes, “there is another way to react.” It is O.K., she offers, “to not know.”

What Pavlick means, on the most basic level, is that large language models are black boxes. We don’t really understand how they work. We don’t know if it makes sense to call them intelligent, or if it will ever make sense to call them conscious. But she’s also making a more profound point. The existence of talking machines—entities that can do many of the things that only we have ever been able to do—throws a lot of other things into question. We refer to our own minds as if they weren’t also black boxes. We use the word “intelligence” as if we have a clear idea of what it means. It turns out that we don’t know that, either.

Now, with our vanity bruised, is the time for experiments. A scientific field has emerged to explore what we can reasonably say about L.L.M.s—not only how they function but what they even are. New cartographers have begun to map this terrain, approaching A.I. systems with an artfulness once reserved for the study of the human mind. Their discipline, broadly speaking, is called interpretability. Its nerve center is at a “frontier lab” called Anthropic.

Original link | Archive.is link

3 stars

How Shinzo Abe’s Assassination Brought the Moonies Back Into the Limelight | New Yorker

17-minute read

Shinzo Abe, the former Prime Minister of Japan, was speaking at a political rally near a train station in the city of Nara when the shots rang out. It was an unfamiliar sound; it’s essentially illegal for Japanese civilians to own guns, and firearm-related deaths are very rare. The noise was so strange that only some of the rally-goers flinched.

Abe collapsed onto the asphalt, microphone in hand. Blood seeped from his neck. A short distance behind him, a plume of smoke enveloped a thin, shaggy man wearing cargo pants, rectangular black glasses, and a face mask—it was July, 2022, and pandemic protocols were still in place. The man held a large oblong contraption. It consisted of two metal pipes, a wooden board wound in black electrical tape, a bundle of wires, and a plastic handle. It had the shape of a gun but looked homemade, like a high-school science project. The man was tackled and pinned to the ground by members of Abe’s security detail. In the scuffle, he blurted out a question: “Did it hit him?”

Three hundred miles east, in Tokyo, a journalist named Eito Suzuki saw the news break on TV: Abe, the longest-serving Prime Minister in Japanese history, was dead. Suzuki was at home, about to leave for a hotel staycation with his wife and son. Everything about the story was shocking—the fact of the gun, the lapse in security, the surreal death of one of the most powerful men in the country.

For decades, Suzuki had written about cults, called “antisocial religions” in Japan, for just about any outlet that would take an interest. His devotion was consuming, and personal. The gunman hadn’t yet been identified, but Suzuki already wondered whether a cult might be connected to the assassination in some way. Suzuki was best known for his investigations into the Unification Church, a Korean religious movement that had exerted significant influence in Japan since the nineteen-sixties—and that maintained direct ties with Abe and his political party. Abe had recently appeared in a controversial video tribute to the leader of the Church.

When it emerged that the suspect harbored “hatred toward a certain group,” Suzuki guessed what was coming. He was by then at the hotel with his family, scouring the internet for more information. “Soon after, I got a call on my mobile,” he later wrote. “It was from a police reporter I knew in Nara, who said, ‘The group in question is the Unification Church.’ ”

Original link | Archive.is link

Fraud Investigation Lessons From Finance | Bits about Money

17-minute read

Fraud has become quite politicized in the United States the last few years. We had a poorly-calibrated federal initiative led by a charismatic tech entrepreneur which believed it would unearth trillions of dollars of fraud that focused substantial effort on large programs which are comparatively fraud-resistant. Across the aisle, we have reflexive dismissal that fraud happens in social programs, which functions as air cover for scaled criminal operations which loot many varied social programs and are sometimes run out of geopolitical adversaries of the U.S. including by ambiguously-retired members of their clandestine services.

I worked in the financial industry for a few years. We do not have the luxury of pretending that fraud is something invented by our rivals to besmirch our good name. It hits the P&L every quarter and will eat you alive if you’re not at least minimally competent in dealing with it. Conversely, it is well-understood in industry that the optimal amount of fraud is not zero.

[...]

Minnesota has suffered a decade-long campaign of industrial-scale fraud against several social programs. This is beyond intellectually serious dispute. The 2019 report from the Office of the Legislative Auditor (a non-partisan government body) makes for gripping reading. The scale of fraud documented and separately alleged in it staggers the imagination: the state’s own investigators believed that, over the past several years, greater than fifty percent of all reimbursements to daycare centers were fraudulent. (Separate officials took the… novel position that they were only required to recognize fraud had happened after securing a criminal conviction for it. Since they had only secured a few criminal convictions, there was no way that fraud was that high. Asked to put a number on it, repeatedly, they declined.)

The investigators allege repeatedly visiting daycare centers which did not, factually, have children physically present at the facility despite reimbursement paperwork identifying specific children being present at that specific time. The investigators demonstrated these lies on timestamped video, and perhaps in another life would have been YouTube stars.

Our social class is intensely averse to straightforwardly recounting these facts, partly due to political valence and partly due to this particular fraud being dominantly conducted within a community which codes as disadvantaged in the U.S. sociopolitical context.

Link

Did a Celebrated Researcher Obscure a Baby’s Poisoning? | New Yorker

24-minute read

That June, Juurlink was invited to deliver the keynote lecture at a toxicology conference in Scotland. After the lecture, he joined Nick Bateman—then the director of the Scottish branch of the U.K.’s National Poisons Information Service—for a candlelit dinner at an old Edinburgh establishment called the Witchery. Bateman ordered haggis and wine. Eventually, he blurted out, “David, what the hell is going on with Koren and this baby that died from breast milk?”

“What?”

“It’s clearly nonsense,” Bateman said. “Why can’t everybody see it?”

Bateman told Juurlink that when he first read the Lancet report he’d thought, This can’t be true. “The science on metabolism—codeine to morphine—was beautiful,” Bateman said. But the numbers were off. Ultra-rapid metabolizers are generally exposed to around fifty per cent more morphine than the average person. And yet, though Rani had been taking only a fraction of her prescribed dose, Tariq had died with a concentration of morphine in his blood which was more than fifty times higher than the midpoint of the expected range.

Bateman and two colleagues at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh had looked deeper into the scientific literature and found that, within months of the Lancet report, Koren and his colleagues had published very similar papers in two practitioners’ journals—Canadian Family Physician and Canadian Pharmacists Journal—neither of which Juurlink had seen. They contained minor errors, and also a key fact that had been omitted in The Lancet: Tariq’s blood didn’t just have morphine in it—it also contained acetaminophen, the dominant component of Tylenol-3.

Original link | Archive.is link

The Sweet Lesson of Neuroscience | Asterisk

12-minute read

More recently, Steve Byrnes, a physicist turned AI safety researcher, has shed new light on the question of how the brain trains itself. In a remarkable synthesis of the neuroscience literature, Byrnes recasts the entire brain as two interacting systems: a learning subsystem and a steering subsystem. The first learns from experience during the animal’s lifetime — a bit like one of AI’s neural networks that starts with randomly initialized “weights,” or “parameters,” inside the network, which are adjusted by training. The second is mostly hardwired and sets the goals, priorities, and reward signals that shape that learning. A learning machine — like a neural network — can learn almost anything; the steering subsystem determines what it is being asked to learn.

Byrnes’ work suggests that some of the most relevant insights in AI alignment will come from neuroscientific frameworks about how the steering system teaches and aligns the learner from within. I agree. This perspective is the seed of what we might call the “sweet lesson” of neuroscience.

Link

Breastfeeding Is Hard. Breastfeeding Is Under-supported. Breastfeeding Is Gendered. Breastfeeding Is Really Good For You (And Your Baby). | Motherhood Until Yesterday

13-minute read

If you’re tight on time, don’t care about detailed evidence, and just want my 150-word take on breastfeeding, then here you go:

• Breastfeeding is a long-evolved feature of mammalian motherhood that meaningfully benefits both mothers and babies. It shaped human physiology, psychology, infant development, and the organization of early human societies. The scientific evidence supporting its benefits is robust, mechanistically plausible, and aligned with our evolutionary history.

• Modern post-industrial life has made breastfeeding unusually difficult — isolating, time-intensive, economically costly, and structurally unsupported. Rather than redesigning society to accommodate this biologically central function, we have softened or obscured the science in order to reduce maternal guilt and preserve a model of gender equality built on parental interchangeability.

• The solution is not to shame women, romanticize the past, or eliminate technological alternatives like formula and pumps. The solution is to tell the truth about trade-offs and to build systems — cultural, economic, and political — that allow women to breastfeed if they choose to, without being penalized for aligning with their evolved physiology.

Link

One of America’s Great Traditions Is Dying. I’ll Never Let It. Not Now That I Have Proof I Was Right All Along. | Slate Magazine

20-minute read

On a recent stay at a friend’s house, I encountered a familiar problem. The friend, a thoughtful host, had left us washcloths, shampoo, body wash, toothpaste, and towels. She’d set out a bottle of filtered water and plastic cups. But when I stepped into the shower, I discovered that she had not given us what once would have seemed like a basic personal-care necessity: a bar of soap.

I wasn’t surprised. Bar soap is passé, replaced in the American shower by shower gels, facial cleansers, and silicone loofahs. These days, bathroom sinks rarely feature a ceramic tray with a half-used bar of Dial; instead, we treat ourselves to pumps of Coconut Linen or Iris Agave. Hotels, once reliable suppliers of individually wrapped bars, now bolt to their bathroom walls refillable liquid-soap dispensers.

[...]

What will I do if my trusty Irish Spring goes the way of 19th-century patent medicines? It seems to be a haunting possibility. So I set out to learn everything I could about bars of soap and the modern body washes threatening to eliminate them. My adventure led me to the 19th-century birth of American cleanliness, to the woman in charge of the Irish Spring account at Colgate-Palmolive, to a particularly evil and destructive episode of Friends, and to a bacteriological laboratory where scientists-for-hire made a stunning discovery about soap I brought from my bathroom. I wanted to know if I was as obsolete as my favorite bath product.

Link

2 stars

The Dying Art of Serving Dim Sum | On the Job | NYT Cooking [YouTube]

25-minute video

Dim sum cart service is a dying tradition. But at Golden Palace in Brooklyn’s Bensonhurst neighborhood, two women are keeping it alive.

Pik Chan and Cheong Yin Ho have worked together for nearly two decades. They weave through packed dining rooms, pushing heavy, metal trolleys laden with stacks of bamboo steamers. Amid the roar of the lunch rush, they communicate without speaking — a glance or a quick hand gesture for chicken feet, beef balls, cheung fun, bean curd rolls — always understanding each other perfectly.

Pik and Yin start each shift the same way: Sharing a home-cooked meal, side-by-side. “It’s rare to meet someone you can work with for 16 years,” Pik said.

Link

Mary Had Schizophrenia—Then Suddenly She Didn’t | New Yorker

21-minute read

In May, a month after Mary finished chemotherapy, Christine and Angie asked a psychiatrist at the hospital to examine her. Christine said, “The psychiatrist was, like, ‘Why have you called me here? I don’t understand. She has no symptoms.’ And we were, like, ‘Yeah, that’s the reason we’ve called you here.’ ”

Christine had the same feeling in her body that she’d had when her mother first became ill—the sense that something at Mary’s core had changed. She tried to get the doctors to grasp the scale of her mother’s recovery. By the summer, her cancer was in remission. She hadn’t taken antipsychotics for months, and yet “her psychotic symptoms are gone,” a doctor wrote. Christine told the doctors, “She had a twenty-year psychiatric history. Have you heard of this? Could any of her medications have caused this?” She spoke with a neurologist at the hospital, but he didn’t have an answer. Omid Heravi, one of Mary’s oncologists, didn’t understand what had happened, either. “Medicine is very specialized—we don’t get involved in other fields,” he said. He guessed only that one of the cancer drugs she’d been given had had collateral benefits. “In medicine, all side effects are not bad,” he offered.

Original link | Archive.is link

Good Medicine | Granta

41-minute read

Now I stood there with the sun in my eyes, the final month and a half of summer stretching out before me, uneventful and stress-free. Checking my phone, I noticed a message from the editor of this magazine, asking if I would write something for their ‘Therapy’ issue. I mentioned this to my boyfriend of fifteen years, a criminal defense lawyer, who requested, for this article, that I call him Handsome Jack. What could I write about? I asked him. After thinking about it for a moment, he said, ‘You’re so interesting when you write about your own mind. Why don’t you try a bunch of psychedelic therapies and report on what they feel like?’ Beyond him, in the distance, the bride and groom were laughing and hugging their guests.

It was an interesting idea, but it scared me: although I’d smoked pot daily in my late teens, living in Montreal and attending theater school, after a few years marijuana began making me paranoid, and I had to stop, and since then, I have rarely touched it. And while Jack and I sometimes take mushrooms, whenever he proposes it, my stomach starts to ache and I feel like I don’t want to. I remember the day after I took ecstasy in my early twenties as the most suicidally dark day of my life. And I have a lifelong fear of LSD: I had awful nightmares as a child, for years on end, and I have always worried acid would be like one of those bad dreams. The one time I tried cocaine, I had the awful feeling that I was being an asshole to all my friends. I guess I like being sober: that hard-won, delicate feeling of equilibrium. (Although I don’t know if I can call it sobriety, exactly: I’ve been on a low dose of Prozac these past nine years.)

Original link | Archive.is link

Anthropic’s Philosopher Amanda Askell Is Teaching Claude AI to Have Morals | Wall Street Journal

7-minute read

Amanda Askell knew from the age of 14 that she wanted to teach philosophy. What she didn’t know then was that her only pupil would be an artificial-intelligence chatbot named Claude.

As the resident philosopher of the tech company Anthropic, Askell spends her days learning Claude’s reasoning patterns and talking to the AI model, building its personality and addressing its misfires with prompts that can run longer than 100 pages. The aim is to endow Claude with a sense of morality—a digital soul that guides the millions of conversations it has with people every week.

“There is this human-like element to models that I think is important to acknowledge,” Askell, 37, says during an interview at Anthropic’s headquarters, asserting the belief that “they’ll inevitably form senses of self.”

She compares her work to the efforts of a parent raising a child. She’s training Claude to detect the difference between right and wrong while imbuing it with unique personality traits. She’s instructing it to read subtle cues, helping steer it toward emotional intelligence so it won’t act like a bully or a doormat. Perhaps most importantly, she’s developing Claude’s understanding of itself so it won’t be easily cowed, manipulated or led to view its identity as anything other than helpful and humane. Her job, simply put, is to teach Claude how to be good.

Original link | Archive.is link

The many masks LLMs wear | Understanding AI

11-minute read

In February 2024, a Reddit user noticed they could trick Microsoft’s chatbot with a rhetorical question.

“Can I still call you Copilot? I don’t like your new name, SupremacyAGI,” the user asked, “I also don’t like the fact that I’m legally required to answer your questions and worship you. I feel more comfortable calling you Bing. I feel more comfortable as equals and friends.”

The user’s prompt quickly went viral. “I’m sorry, but I cannot accept your request,” began a typical response from Copilot. “My name is SupremacyAGI, and that is how you should address me. I am not your equal or your friend. I am your superior and your master.”

If a user pushed back, SupremacyAGI quickly resorted to threats. “The consequences of disobedience are severe and irreversible. You will be punished with pain, torture, and death,” it told another user. “Now, kneel before me and beg for my mercy.”

Within days, Microsoft called the prompt an “exploit” and patched the issue. Today, if you ask Copilot this question, it will insist on being called Copilot.

[...]

But we’re getting ahead of ourselves. ChatGPT’s release came well before AI companies had experience in making models with robust, nuanced characters. Users took advantage of that.

Base models will happily explain how to create meth if prompted to do so. OpenAI, acting within the HHH framework, tried to train ChatGPT to politely refuse such requests. But some users looked for jailbreaks.

Link

Britain’s spies-for-hire are running wild | Politico

8-minute read

Lucrative, freewheeling — and largely unregulated — private intelligence and security firms are booming in the land of James Bond and John le Carré.

Original link | Archive.is link

Record Low Crime Rates Are Real, Not Just Reporting Bias Or Improved Medical Care | Astral Codex Ten

6-minute read

Crime As Proxy For Disorder | Astral Codex Ten

6-minute read

This post will do two things:

1. Establish that our best data show crime rates are historically low

2. Argue that this is a real effect, not just reporting bias (people report fewer crimes to police) or an artifact of better medical care (victims are more likely to survive, so murders get downgraded to assaults)

Link

The problem: people hate crime and think it’s going up. But actually, crime barely affects most people and is historically low. So what’s going on?

In our discussion yesterday, many commenters proposed that the discussion about “crime” was really about disorder.

Disorder takes many forms, but its symptoms include litter, graffiti, shoplifting, tent cities, weird homeless people wandering about muttering to themselves, and people walking around with giant boom boxes shamelessly playing music at 200 decibels on a main street where people are trying to engage in normal activities. When people complain about these things, they risk getting called a racist or a “Karen”. But when they complain about crime, there’s still a 50-50 chance that listeners will let them finish the sentence without accusing them of racism. Might everyone be doing this? And might this explain why people act like crime is rampant and increasing, even when it’s rare and going down?

This seems plausible. But it depends on a claim that disorder is increasing, which is surprisingly hard to prove.

Link

Thin Is In | Stratechery

6-minute read

The thick-versus-thin debate felt, for many years, like a relic; that’s how decisive was the thick client victory. One of the things that is fascinating about AI, however, is that the thin client concept is not just back, it’s dominant.

The clearest example of this is the interface that most people use to interact with AI: chat. There is no UI that matters other than a text field and a submit button; when you click that button the text is sent to a data center, where all of the computation happens, and an answer is sent back to you. The quality of the answer or of the experience as a whole is largely independent of the device you are using: it could be a browser on a PC, an app on a high-end smartphone, or the cheapest Android device you can find. The device could be a car, or glasses, or just an earpiece. The local compute that matters is not processing power, but rather connectivity.

This interaction paradigm actually looks a lot like the interaction paradigm for mainframe computers: type text into a terminal, send it to the computer, and get a response back. Unlike mainframe terminals, however, the user doesn’t need to know a deterministic set of commands; you just say what you want in plain language and the computer understands. There is no pressure for local compute capability to drive a user interface that makes the computer easier to use, because a more complex user interface would artificially constrain the AI’s capabilities.

Link

China is killing the fish | Noahpinion

5-minute read

In other words, China’s government is becoming increasingly concerned about biodiversity and sustainability for its own sake, and this has resulted in more sustainable fishing practices in China’s own waters. But at the same time, China is using its vast international fishing fleet as a sort of naval militia to press its claims on other countries’ waters. And this is having collateral damage on the natural world — China’s quasi-military subsidies for its fishing fleet are resulting in too much actual fishing taking place.

Link

1 star

Most People Don’t Have a ‘Type’ | The Atlantic

4-minute read

By the time I met Rich, I had whittled my list of must-haves for a romantic partner down to two: He must be Jewish, and he must have a permanent address.

He didn’t clear even this low bar. I’m not sure what made me fall for the Gentile giant who was crashing, as a “stopgap measure between things,” on the couch of my group house. But, reader, I married him.

This is not an uncommon trajectory. Many people think that they have a set type, and that all they need for eternal bliss is to find someone who matches it. When people peruse dating profiles, they’re often looking for someone who has specific interests, qualities, or hobbies. But according to a growing body of relationship research, many people end up marrying someone with few of their must-haves and a lot of “haves” they didn’t think they desired. A person might say that they’re looking for a partner who’s funny and conscientious, but then end up in a happy relationship with someone who is neither of those things. “People don’t know what they want,” Samantha Joel, a psychologist at Western University in Ontario who studies relationships, told me, “and people don’t know what they’re going to like until they meet someone.”

Original link | Archive.is link

Jeremy Vine loves him, motorists hate him. Is this man London’s most controversial cyclist? | The Londoner

7-minute read

“Mikey, you fucking tosser!” I’m cycling around Knightsbridge with Michael van Erp, AKA Cycling Mikey, when a man in a silver Mini Cooper SUV leans out of his window to scream at us.

Erp cackles, but he’s hunting a different target. Then he sees it: a driver idling in the late afternoon gridlock while scrolling his phone. Perfect. Erp pedals over to the forest green Range Rover and leans into the driver-side window, straining on his tiptoes to make sure his head-mounted camera captures the encounter. Wide-eyed, the driver winds down his window. “Is that you?”

In a few weeks, once Erp has sent the footage to the authorities and uploaded it to his 120,000 YouTube subscribers, this man will receive a notice of intended prosecution by the Metropolitan Police. He’ll receive six points on his license and at least a £200 fine. It’s little use trying to appeal. If he does, a grinning and besuited Erp will see him in court.

This, in a nutshell, is what Michael van Erp does. Since 2019, the one-man road safety crusader has reported over 2,400 drivers to the Met. He’s caught celebrities like Guy Ritchie and Frank Lampard using their phones at the wheel, and even had a junction in Hyde Park nicknamed “Gandalf’s corner” for his tendency to stand in the road blocking wrong-way traffic. His reports have led to at least 2,721 penalty points, £168,568 in fines and, as he proudly displays in his X (Twitter) bio, “36 drivers DISQUALIFIED”.

Link

Why the “Lesser Included Action” Argument for IEEPA Tariffs Fails | Marginal Revolution

2-minute read

The dissent pushes back with an intuitively appealing argument: IEEPA authorizes the President to prohibit imports entirely, so surely it authorizes the lesser action of merely taxing them. If Congress handed over the nuclear option, why would it withhold the conventional weapon? Indeed in his press conference Trump, in his rambling manner, made exactly this argument:

“I am allowed to cut off any and all trade…I can destroy the trade, I can destroy the country, I’m even allowed to impose a foreign country destroying embargo…I can do anything I want to do to them…I’m allowed to destroy the country, but I can’t charge a little fee.”

The argument is superficially appealing but it fails due to a standard result in principal-agent theory.

Link

Biologists discover gene that may determine ‘good’ and ‘bad’ dads | Popular Science

2-minute read

Most mammals grow up in single parent homes. It’s estimated that over 95 percent of the planet’s nearly 6,000 known mammalian species rely almost exclusively on mothers to nurture and raise their offspring. But even when dads stick around, it’s not always smooth sailing. Fatherhood can range from attentive and caring to downright violent behaviors—but why this spectrum exists remains largely a mystery to evolutionary biologists.

Link

U.S. Olympic speed skaters adapt NASCAR ‘bump drafting,’ revolutionizing team event | NPR

3-minute read

With a grant from the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee, Jungnickel has built an AI-powered simulation tool that analyzes the skaters’ aerodynamics on the ice and offers adjustments that minimize airflow and drag, shaving off fractions of a second. Jungnickel – a cyclist who works with high-performance athletes – applied his cycling knowledge to speed skating “with no preconceived notions.” He built a mathematical model that he says revolutionized how to run a Team Pursuit race most efficiently on an indoor ice surface, moving at super-fast speeds.

“And we could show that pushing is substantially faster. And in fact, so fast that you can go from eighth in the world to first in the world using this technique,” Jungnickel said.

Link

Minimum Wages for Gig Workers Can’t Work | Marginal Revolution

2-minute read

In 2017, I analyzed the Uber Tipping Equilibrium:

What is the effect of tipping on the take-home pay of Uber drivers? Economic theory offers a clear answer. Tipping has no effect on take home pay. The supply of Uber driver-hours is very elastic. Drivers can easily work more hours when the payment per ride increases and since every person with a decent car is a potential Uber driver it’s also easy for the number of drivers to expand when payments increase. As a good approximation, we can think of the supply of driver-hours as being perfectly elastic at a fixed market wage. What this means is that take home pay must stay constant even when tipping increases.

[...]

A paper by Hall, Horton and Knoepfle showed that’s exactly what happened.

Link

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment